246 Fully Vaccinated People in Michigan Test Positive for COVID-19; 3 Dead

So brethren, if I am processing this correctly – getting the vaccine is actually creating more infectious people, therefore they will spread Covid 19 to others among their families and friends. Is this not right?

Am I not understanding what is happening?

If we are to take the “Depopulation” narrative as truth, then this would make perfect sense. It is absolutely insane that those on the Left cannot see this.

Or maybe they do? Maybe they are so brainwashed, that they get the vaccine in hopes that they may die and therefore help the eugenicists in their goal of decreasing earth’s population to under 500 million.

They want to be martyrs for “Mother Earth.”

That’s just NUTS. But the world has gone crazy, so why should this surprise us?

From epochtimes.com

Michigan data show that 246 residents have tested positive for COVID-19 more than two weeks after being fully vaccinated against the virus that causes it.

The potential so-called vaccine breakthrough cases were recorded between Jan. 1 and March 31.

Eleven of the residents were hospitalized and three died, a spokesperson with the state Department of Health and Human Services (MDDHS) told The Epoch Times via email. The people who died were all 65 years of age or older.

Data about hospitalization status for 129 cases were incomplete, and for the other set, hospitalization status was reported as unknown.

The fully vaccinated cases were identified through weekly reviews of data on all confirmed and probable cases of COVID-19, the disease caused by the CCP virus. State officials compare the data to records of every person who has been fully vaccinated.

Fully vaccinated means two weeks have elapsed since a person has received two doses of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine, or the single-shot Johnson & Johnson vaccine.

“These are individuals who have had a positive test 14 or more days after the last dose in the vaccine series. Some of these individuals may ultimately be excluded from this list due to continuing to test positive from a recent infection prior to being fully vaccinated. These cases are undergoing further review to determine if they meet other CDC criteria for determination of potential breakthrough, including the absence of a positive antigen or PCR test less than 45 days prior to the post-vaccination positive test,” the spokesperson said.

“In general, these persons have been more likely to be asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic compared with vaccinated persons. Please note, to date, more than 1.7 million Michiganders have completed their COVID-19 vaccine. Some of these cases may be ruled out via additional investigation.”

According to the Food and Drug Administration, Pfizer’s vaccine is considered 95 percent effective in preventing severe symptoms of COVID-19. Moderna’s is 94 percent, and Johnson & Johnson’s is approximately 67 percent.


Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer receives a dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine at Ford Field during an event to promote and encourage Michigan residents to get the vaccine, in Detroit, on April 6, 2021. (Matthew Hatcher/Getty Images)

“While the majority of the population develops full immunity within 14 days of completion of their vaccine series, a small proportion appear to take longer to mount a full antibody response,” the MDHHS spokeswoman said. “We expect to see breakthrough cases with any vaccination, including all the COVID-19 vaccines. The number of potential cases identified to date is not in excess of what might be expected with vaccines with 95 percent efficacy. Studies indicate that even if vaccinated people do become ill, they are far less likely to experience severe illness requiring hospitalization or resulting in death.”

Officials say the potential for breakthrough cases is why they still encourage Michiganders to take precautions while out in public, such as wearing masks, washing hands, and social distancing even after they’re fully vaccinated.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is creating a new website to provide additional information about investigating breakthrough cases. The site is expected to launch within the next several weeks. It will include summary data from all states, Michigan officials said.

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer told reporters last week that “zero percent of the people in our hospitals right now have been vaccinated, which tells you the vaccines work.”

Whitmer said during a press conference on April 6 that the efficacy rates mean some people who get the vaccines won’t gain complete protection.

“We’re delving into the numbers” on breakthrough cases, she said. “What we do know, though, is that this vaccine can save your life. This is a virus that none of us knows how our body is going to react to it. For so many, it has been fatal or devastating, or for many, we’re still learning how long are the impacts of this virus going to impact them, afflict them. So this vaccine still is the best way to protect yourself.”

Dr. Joneigh Khaldun, the state’s chief medical executive, said the shots “are some of the best vaccines that we have.”

“We’ve now got vaccines that are over 95 percent effective. And even if you do get COVID-19, and once you’ve had a vaccine, it is highly unlikely that you will be hospitalized or die,” she said.

Other states have also seen breakthrough cases. In Washington state, authorities reported last week that they found evidence of 102 such cases, with eight of the patients requiring hospitalization and two dying.

In a letter published on March 23 in the New England Journal of Medicine, a group of California physicians reported that out of 36,659 health care workers tested after receiving one or two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine, 379 tested positive for COVID-19 at least one day after vaccination. Thirty-seven of them tested positive after getting two shots, mostly within two weeks after the second injection.

“The rarity of positive test results 14 days after administration of the second dose of vaccine is encouraging and suggests that the efficacy of these vaccines is maintained outside the trial setting,” the doctors wrote. Source

I wonder how much money is being paid to the criminal doctors who are touting the vaccines as a great success. Big Pharma has lots of bucks to throw around, so these compliant doctors must be rolling in the dough.

Keep praying. Keep sharing the gospel. Keep telling people to NOT get the vaccine.


How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom B’Yeshua


Biden to Restore Taxpayer Funding to Wuhan Lab, WHO: So When You Read About “Mutations” That is Their Code-Word for More ‘Gain of Function’ Experimentation in Wuhan Lab

The times in which we live are more Satanic than any other time in history. And the EVIL will continue to escalate until our Lord comes to gather us away from this place to be with Him forever.

From washingtontimes.com

“A rising China is a positive, positive development, not only for China but for America and the world writ large,” then-Vice President Joe Biden said in 2011.

Spring forward to 2021, after China unleashed the coronavirus pandemic on the world, lied about its transmission and worked to cover up its origin, it seems President Biden feels the same way about China as he did a decade ago. 

The U.S. is set to reinstate taxpayer funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the lab that may have been the source of the coronavirus outbreak. The National Institutes of Health told the Daily Caller the Chinese virology lab has an active Foreign Assurance file that authorizes it for U.S. funding until 2024.

Last year, the NIH terminated U.S. funding to the lab until it was cleared of its involvement in the coronavirus outbreak. Earlier this month, the World Health Organization issued a report saying the virus more likely jumped to humans from animals than from being leaked by the lab. Voila — U.S. taxpayer money was returned to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

There are a few huge problems with this.

First is the WHO’s investigation into the lab. The Wall Street Journal reported Chinese authorities refused to provide the WHO team with raw, personalized data or early cases that could help them determine how and when the coronavirus began spreading in China. Instead, it gave WHO investigators their analysis on the cases — so, basically, CCP propaganda, which the WHO happily repeated. 

The second issue is the group of WHO investigators who examined the Wuhan lab was filled with CCP cronies. The only American in the delegation was Peter Daszak, the president of EcoHealth Alliance, the nonprofit that the U.S. federal government uses to route its funding to the Wuhan virology lab. Yes, that’s right — the only American was the one whose nonprofit was funded by the U.S. federal government to allocate taxpayer money to the Chinese lab.

Matt Pottinger, former Trump deputy national security adviser, highlighted the issue Sunday on CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

The panel of investigators sent to China by the WHO was “deeply conflicted” and composed of people who were hand-picked by the Chinese government, Mr. Pottinger said.

“You have a situation where it’s like you’re turning to the rabbits to investigate what happened to the lettuce that they were guarding,” Mr. Pottinger said. “And so, it’s not a credible exercise that we’ve seen undertaken to get to the roots of where this thing originated.”

Mr. Pottinger concluded: “If you weigh the circumstantial evidence, the ledger on the side of an explanation that says that this resulted from some kind of human error, it far outweighs the side of the scale that says this was some natural outbreak.”

Yet, the Biden administration has not only resumed U.S. taxpayer funding to the Wuhan lab, but they have also committed to refunding the WHO — without any commitments from the organization on better transparency. This is after the WHO ran cover for China last year, saying the virus didn’t spread human to human or asymptomatically. The WHO that praised the Chinese government for shutting down domestic travel but criticized the U.S. for shutting down international travel. The WHO whose coronavirus investigative team was thoroughly corrupt. 

So, if you’re keeping track of the Biden administration, that’s two wins for China, zero for America. Farewell, America First. Welcome, a rising China.


Brethren, do not believe anything that comes from the LEFT. They are liars because their father is a LIAR and has no truth in him.

Lord, help us to stand firm in Truth. YOU are TRUTH.

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom B’Yeshua


BOMBSHELL: US Grant To Wuhan Lab To Enhance Bat-Based Coronaviruses (Gain of Function Research) Was NEVER SCRUTINIZED By HHS Review Board, NIH Says

Many of my readers will remember when I wrote several articles on the dangerous and risky practice of GOFR (Gain of Function Research) which is experimenting on a virus to enhance its ability to be spread and to infect as many of the earth’s population as possible.

Here is one of my articles from 2020:

Dr. Fauci Backed Controversial Wuhan Lab With Millions of U.S. Dollars For Risky Coronavirus Research

This article will show the reader that the protocol to scrutinize the GOFR of Covid 19 was ignored.

From dailysignal.com

An oversight board created to scrutinize research that would enhance highly dangerous pathogens did not review a National Institutes of Health grant that funded a lab in Wuhan, China, to genetically modify bat-based coronaviruses.

Experts say the NIH grant describes scientists as conducting gain-of-function research, a risky area of study that, in this case, made SARS-like viruses even more contagious. (emphasis added)

Federal funding for gain-of-function research was suspended temporarily in 2014 due to widespread scientific concerns it risked leaking supercharged viruses into the human population.

Federal funding for gain-of-function research was resumed in late 2017 after the Potential Pandemic Pathogens Control and Oversight Framework was formed within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 

The review board is tasked with critically evaluating whether grants that involve enhancing dangerous pathogens, such as coronaviruses, are worth the risks and that proper safeguards are in place.

But the NIH subagency that awarded the grant to the nonprofit group EcoHealth Alliance to study Chinese bat coronaviruses opted against forwarding it to a Potential Pandemic Pathogens Control and Oversight review committee, an NIH spokesperson told The Daily Caller News Foundation, meaning the research received federal funding without an independent review by the HHS board.

“This is a systemic problem,” Rutgers University professor of chemical biology Richard H. Ebright told The Daily Caller News Foundation, referring to the loophole in the review framework.

Ebright said the offices of the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases—the subagency that funded EcoHealth—and the NIH have “systematically thwarted—indeed systematically nullified—the Potential Pandemic Pathogens Control and Oversight Framework by declining to flag and forward proposals for review.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci leads the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Dr. Francis S. Collins heads the NIH.

An NIH spokesperson said its subagency did not flag the EcoHealth grant for independent review by the HHS review committee.

“After careful review of the grant, NIAID [National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases] determined research in the grant was not gain-of-function research because it did not involve the enhancement of the pathogenicity or transmissibility of the viruses studied,” the spokesperson told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

“We would not submit research proposals that did not meet the definition, because otherwise we would need to submit everything,” the spokesperson said.

How Federal Oversight Is Bypassed

The Wuhan Institute of Virology is at the center of widespread speculation that COVID-19 could have accidentally leaked from a lab into the human population. EcoHealth’s grant to study bat-based coronaviruses in China included the transfer of $600,000 to the institute.

Had EcoHealth’s grant been subjected to Potential Pandemic Pathogens Control and Oversight review, an HHS panel would have independently evaluated the grant. If necessary, the HHS panel would have recommended additional biocontainment measures to prevent potential lab leaks—or even recommended that the grant be denied entirely.

The Wuhan Institute of Virology is a biosafety level 4 laboratory, the highest level biocontainment certification, but U.S. Embassy officials issued two diplomatic cables warning about inadequate safety at the lab after a visit in 2018. One of the cables warned that the lab’s work on bat-based coronaviruses represented the risk of a new SARS-like pandemic, according to The Washington Post.

An annex to the World Health Organization’s COVID-19 origin report released last Tuesday describes the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s work using “recombinant viruses” in tests involving bat coronaviruses, which Rutgers’ Ebright said are descriptions of gain-of-function research.

The U.S. government paused funding of gain-of-function research in 2014 after lab workers were exposed accidentally to anthrax by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, according to The New York Times

The incident came on the heels of widespread scientific outcry in 2011 when it was revealed that laboratories in Wisconsin and the Netherlands were intentionally modifying the H5N1 bird flu virus so it could more effectively jump between ferrets.

Federally funded gain-of-function research resumed in 2017 after new oversight procedures were implemented. The review framework split oversight responsibilities between two groups—the funding agency (the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in the case of the EcoHealth grant) and the Potential Pandemic Pathogens Control and Oversight review committee, an interdisciplinary group convened by HHS.

The review committee is responsible for recommending whether a research grant involving gain-of-function needs to include any additional risk mitigation measures, an HHS spokesperson told The Daily Caller News FoundationBut the committee is kept in the dark on any grant until the funding agency flags one for its review.

The so-called P3CO Framework doesn’t require the HHS review committee to take a second look at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ determination following its review that the EcoHealth grant did not involve gain-of-function research.

The NIH spokesperson said it would be “misleading and inaccurate” to suggest that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases was required to notify the HHS review committee of its determination.

An HHS spokesperson confirmed that the department’s P3CO Review Committee reviews only research grants that are flagged for additional review by funding agencies such as the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The spokesperson did not answer when asked if the review committee had knowledge of the EcoHealth grant.

Ecohealth has a history of manipulating bat-based coronaviruses. The group’s president, Peter Daszak, said as much during a podcast interview filmed in Singapore just weeks before the first reported cases of COVID-19 in Wuhan in December 2019.

“You can manipulate them in the lab pretty easily,” Daszak said. “Spike protein drives a lot of what happens with the coronavirus. Zoonotic risk. So you can get the sequence, you can build the protein—and we work with Ralph Baric at [the University of North Carolina] to do this—and insert the backbone of another virus and do some work in the lab.”

Rutgers’ Ebright told The Daily Caller News Foundation that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases was wrong to determine that the EcoHealth grant did not involve enhancing the transmissibility of Chinese bat-based coronaviruses. 

He said the project’s abstract for the 2019 fiscal year, which referenced “in vitro and in vivo infection experiments” on coronaviruses, “unequivocally required risk-benefit review under the HHS P3CO Framework.”

Other scientists have said EcoHealth’s NIH-funded work in China involved gain-of-function research on bat-based coronaviruses.

“It is hard to overemphasize that the central logic of this grant was to test the pandemic potential of SARS-related bat coronaviruses by making ones with pandemic potential, either through genetic engineering or passaging, or both,” Drs. Jonathan Latham and Allison Wilson wrote in June.

The NIH terminated the EcoHealth grant in April 2020. The NIH deputy director for extramural research, Michael Lauer, told the group in a letter that the agency “does not believe that the current project outcomes align with the program goals and agency priorities.”

Fauci said during a hearing before the House Energy and Commerce Committee in June that the EcoHealth grant was canceled “because the NIH was told to cancel it.”

“I don’t know the reason, but we were told to cancel it,” Fauci said.

Fauci told Politico following the hearing that the Trump White House ordered the NIH to cancel the grant.

Government Oversight Flawed

The only known member of the HHS P3CO Review Committee is its chairman, Chris Hassell, the senior science adviser for the HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response. Hassell disclosed his involvement in a January 2020 talk before the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity.

Hassell said during the talk that the current definition for a potential pandemic pathogen is “very narrow … which has resulted in only getting a few influenza-related proposals” for the P3CO committee’s review.

“I’ll just probably be more frank than maybe appropriate—I think that’s too narrow,” said Hassell, who then suggested that the government could be funding gain-of-function research that his committee hasn’t vetted.

“I think that could be revisited, and again there could be some definition issues,” Hassell said.

When gain-of-function funding was paused in 2014, 21 research projects were halted. But the NIH created exceptions for 10 of those, according to The New York Times.

After the funding continued in 2017, only two projects have been approved under the P3CO Framework. Both projects deal with the influenza virus, according to the NIH.

It’s unclear how many research grants have been reviewed under the framework. An NIH spokesperson said the agency doesn’t comment or discuss unfunded grant applications.

It’s also unclear who else serves on the HHS review committee. Hassell said in January 2020 that the committee is comprised only of federal employees, but said it could be detrimental to their work to release their names.

“As much as it would be good to publicize the individual names, which has been suggested, if that chills anyone being willing to serve on that committee, that would be detrimental,” Hassell said.

An HHS spokesperson said Hassell was unavailable for comment. source

Here are sources directly from NIH which speak about GOFR:

From pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

The ethics of biosafety considerations in gain-of-function research resulting in the creation of potential pandemic pathogens

From pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Why Do Exceptionally Dangerous Gain-of-Function Experiments in Influenza?

And here is an informative article on GOFR from a UK news website:

From express.co.uk

Coronavirus study identifies ‘gain of function for efficient spread in humans’

Brethren, we really do have all the information we need to process the events which led up to the Plandemic in 2020. The Leftist media does not touch this information and the Leftist readers are perfectly fine in accepting the narrative from the media.

It pains me when I think of all of the people who have died and will die from the jabs without knowing Jesus Christ as their Savior.

Satan’s fingerprints are all over this.

Share the Gospel of Christ with everyone you know!

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom B’Yeshua