‘Unethical’ and up to 98 Times Worse Than the Disease: Top Scientists Publish Paradigm-Shifting Study About COVID-19 Vaccines

From theepochtimes.com

A team of nine experts from Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and other top universities has published paradigm-shifting research about the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines and why mandating vaccines for college students is unethical.

This 50-page study, which was published on The Social Science Research Network at the end of August, analyzed CDC and industry-sponsored data on vaccine adverse events, and concluded that mandates for COVID-19 boosters for young people may cause 18 to 98 actual serious adverse events for each COVID-19 infection-related hospitalization theoretically prevented.

The paper is co-authored by Dr. Stefan Baral, an epidemiology professor at Johns Hopkins University; surgeon Martin Adel Makary, M.D., a professor at Johns Hopkins known for his books exposing medical malfeasance, including “Unaccountable: What Hospitals Won’t Tell You and How Transparency Can Revolutionize Heath Care”; and Dr. Vinayak Prasad, a hematologist-oncologist, who is a professor in the UCSF Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, as well as the author of over 350 academic and peer-reviewed articles.

But among this team of high-profile international experts who authored this paper, perhaps the most notable is Salmaan Keshavjee, M.D., Ph.D., current Director of the Harvard Medical School Center for Global Health Delivery, and professor of Global Health and Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School. Keshavjee has also worked extensively with Partners In Health, a Boston-based non-profit co-founded by the late Dr. Paul Farmer,on treating drug-resistant tuberculosis, according to his online biography.

Risking Disenrollment

As the study pointed out, students at universities in America, Canada, and Mexico are being told they must have a third dose of the vaccines against COVID-19 or be disenrolled. Unvaccinated high school students who are just starting college are also being told the COVID-19 vaccines are “mandatory” for attendance.

These mandates are widespread. There are currently 15 states which continue to honor philosophical (personal belief) exemptions, and 44 states and Washington, D.C. allow religious exemptions to vaccines. But even in these states, private universities are telling parents they will not accept state-recognized vaccine exemptions.

Based on personal interviews with some half a dozen families, The Epoch Times has learned that administrators at some colleges and universities are informing students that they have their own university-employed medical teams to scrutinize the medical exemptions submitted by students and signed by private doctors. These doctors, families are being told, will decide whether the health reasons given are medically valid.

5 Ethical Arguments Against Mandated Boosters

Though rarely reported on in the mainstream media, COVID-19 vaccine boosters have been generating a lot of controversy.

While some countries are quietly compensating people for devastating vaccine injuries, and other countries are limiting COVID-19 vaccine recommendations, the United States is now recommending children 12 and older get Pfizer-BioNTech’s Omicron-specific booster, and young adults over the age of 18 get Moderna’s updated shot.

At the same time, public health authorities in Canada are suggesting Canadians will need COVID-19 vaccines every 90 days.

Against a backdrop of confusing and often changing public health recommendations and booster fatigue, the authors of this new paper argue that university booster mandates are unethical. They give five specific reasons for this bold claim:

1) Lack of policymaking transparency. The scientists pointed out that no formal and scientifically rigorous risk-benefit analysis of whether boosters are helpful in preventing severe infections and hospitalizations exists for young adults.

2) Expected harm. A look at the currently available data shows that mandates will result in what the authors call a “net expected harm” to young people. This expected harm will exceed the potential benefit from the boosters.

3) Lack of efficacy. The vaccines have not effectively prevented transmission of COVID-19. Given how poorly they work—the authors call this “modest and transient effectiveness”—the expected harms caused by the boosters likely outweigh any benefits to public health.

4) No recourse for vaccine-injured young adults. Forcing vaccination as a prerequisite to attend college is especially problematic because young people injured by these vaccines will likely not be able to receive compensation for these injuries.

5) Harm to society. Mandates, the authors insisted, ostracize unvaccinated young adults, excluding them from education and university employment opportunities. Coerced vaccination entails “major infringements to free choice of occupation and freedom of association,” the scientists wrote, especially when “mandates are not supported by compelling public health justification.”

The consequences of non-compliance include being unenrolled, losing internet privileges, losing access to the gym and other athletic facilities, and being kicked out of campus housing, among other things. These punitive approaches, according to the authors, have resulted in unnecessary psychosocial stress, reputation damage, loss of income, and fear of being deported, to name just a few.

22,000 to 30,000 Previously Unaffected Young Adults Must be Vaccinated to Prevent Just 1 Hospitalization

The lack of effectiveness of the vaccines is a major concern to these researchers. Based on their analysis of the public data provided to the CDC, they estimated that between 22,000 and 30,000 previously uninfected young adults would need to be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent just a single hospitalization.

However, this estimate does not take into account the protection conferred by a previous infection. So, the authors insisted, “this should be considered a conservative and optimistic assessment of benefit.”

In other words, the mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 are essentially useless.

Mandated Booster Shots Cause More Harm Than Good

But the documented lack of efficacy is only part of the problem. The researchers further found that per every one COVID-19 hospitalization prevented in young adults who had not previously been infected with COVID-19, the data show that 18 to 98 “serious adverse events” will be caused by the vaccinations themselves.

These events include up to three times as many booster-associated myocarditis in young men than hospitalizations prevented, and as many as 3,234 cases of other side effects so serious that they interfere with normal daily activities.

At a regional hospital in South Carolina, the desk clerk sported a button that read: “I’m Vaccinated Against COVID-19” with a big black check mark on it.

“What about the boosters?” a hospital visitor asked. “It’s starting to seem like we need too many shots.”

“It does seem like a lot,” the clerk agreed. “It’s hard to know what to do.” But she did have some advice for the visitor: “Just keep reading and educating yourself, so you can make an informed decision.”

This new paper is essential reading for anyone trying to decide if they need more vaccines. The authors concluded their study with a call to action. Policymakers must stop mandates for young adults immediately, be sure that those who have already been injured by these vaccines are compensated for the suffering caused by mandates, and openly conduct and share the results of risk-benefit analyses of the vaccines for various age groups.

These measures are necessary, the authors argued, to “begin what will be a long process of rebuilding trust in public health.”

Brave Scientists

The two co-first authors, Dr. Kevin Bardosh and Dr. Allison Krug, both thanked their families for supporting them to “publicly debate Covid-19 vaccine mandates” in the acknowledgments section of the paper.

As we wrote in May, an increasing number of scientists and medical doctors are speaking out about the dubious efficacy and disturbing safety issues surrounding theses fast-tracked COVID-19 vaccines. They do so fully aware of the personal and professional risks involved. They deserve our encouragement and support. SOURCE



Biden Admin Puts Drug Supply Vending Machines in Addiction Epicenter of the Country – Rural Kentucky

From westernjournal.com

The Biden administration will spend $3.6 million to deploy drug supply vending machines in rural areas of Kentucky in an effort aimed at “reducing stigma around drug use to support treatment and recovery.”

In doing so, The Washington Free Beacon said it appears that President Joe Biden and his team are still moving forward with the highly controversial concept of “harm reduction policies.”

In an Aug. 31 news release, the White House wrote, “The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), launched four complementary education campaigns that provide information about the prevalence and dangers of fentanyl, the risks and consequences of mixing drugs, the life-saving power of naloxone, and the importance of reducing stigma around drug use to support treatment and recovery.”

The Free Beacon reported that a new study from the University of Kentucky will be the first effort to deploy harm-reduction vending machines.

These machines have already been deployed in other nations, such as CanadaAustralia and Germany where, “The distribution of sterile needles, syringes and other equipment via syringe vending machines in public areas and prisons is done in Germany in about 120 cities.”

The grant text from the National Institutes of Health said the vending machine or “KyOSK (KY Outreach Service Kiosk), will be supplied with injection equipment, naloxone, fentanyl test strips, hygiene kits, condoms, and other supplies.”

The grant is particularly targeted at two counties where “epidemics of injection drug use, overdoses, hepatitis C, … and … imminent HIV outbreaks” are a major concern, “in rural Appalachian Kentucky which has long been an epicenter of these intertwined crises.”

Patrick Hauf of the Free Beacon said the University of Kentucky declined to comment.
This move comes almost six months after multiple outlets reported on the administration’s plans through the Department of Health and Human Services to distribute crack pipes in a $30 million “harm reduction program.” Massive public blowback threatened to derail that initiative, according to The New York Times.

Numerous liberal news outlets published “fact-check” reports in February, insisting the administration was not distributing crack pipes, and the White House flat-out denied it.

“They were never a part of the kit, it was inaccurate reporting,” then-Press Secretary Jen Psaki said when questioned regarding the kits in February.

“A safe smoking kit may contain alcohol swabs, lip balm, other materials to promote hygiene and reduce the transmission of diseases,” she added.

Investigative reporting by the Free Beacon in May discovered that in the cities of New York, Boston, Baltimore, Washington and Richmond, crack pipes were included in “safe-smoking kits,” despite the White House claiming that they were not.

The report found that “[a] survey of more than two dozen harm reduction organizations found that not all harm reduction organizations distribute safe smoking kits, but those that do almost always provide crack pipes. The few that don’t include crack pipes in their kits say they are willing to, but unable to.”

“I would if I knew how,”  Tyrone Pinkney, who distributes clean needles in Washington, told the Free Beacon. Source



TUCKER CARLSON: Dems’ Vision for a Cleaner Future is Really Part of a Global Suicide Pact (VIDEO)

From msn.com

Tucker Carlson Originals

New ‘Tucker Carlson Originals’ two-part special sees ‘detransitioners’ speak out against trans ‘movement’

In an illuminating new episode of “Tucker Carlson Originals,” Tucker and his Fox Nation documentary team dive deep into the psychology and science of transgender people, highlighting the possible consequences of gender affirmation surgery in sit down conversations with “detransitioners” speaking out against radical transgender activists.

From hormone blockers to irreversible surgeries and sociopolitical pressures, the two-part “Transgressive: The Cult of Confusion” special follows the stories of several former transgender men and women attempting to educate the youth, while also presenting expert analysis from doctors and scientists.

“There were a lot of messages that said, ‘if you feel bad about your body, that means your trans,’” Helena Kerschner told the Fox Nation crew. 

Kerschner, a biological woman who lived as a trans man for a short time, recalled receiving Tumblr messages while struggling with an eating disorder, pointing to social media as having, in part, diagnosed her as a trans man living in a woman’s body.

For a long time, Kerschner said she experienced a sense of hopelessness and regret over her decision to listen to the online voices, and make the transition. 


Walt Heyer, a biological man who lived as a trans woman, told the Fox Nation crew in the special that he now channels his experience into helping others. He is the author of the book “Trans Life Survivors,” and runs a website called Sex Change Regret. Heyer revealed that his research found that over 60% of the group he works with was sexually abused as a child. 

As host Tucker Carlson noted, researcher Lisa Littman’s data pointed in a similar direction, with nearly two-thirds of trans youth and young adults diagnosed with at least one mental health disorder prior to the onset of gender dysphoria. 

“Nearly half of these young people had experienced a traumatic or stressful event just prior to the onset of gender dysphoria,” said Carlson.


In investigating the movement, Carlson and crew sought out analysis from medical experts.

According to Dr. J. Michael Bailey, who was interviewed for the special, there are at least three kinds of gender dysphoria detailed within the scientific community; child onset gender dysphoria, autogynelphilia, and rapid onset gender dysphoria. 

Child onset gender dysphoria is when children at a young age express the desire to grow up and become the other sex. According to Dr. Bailey, these children are the group most likely inclined to eventually reverse, or grow out of, such a belief. 

The second form of gender dysphoria, Autogynelphilia, only relates to biological males. These individuals have a strong urge to dress as women, and the desire is typically sexually motivated. While those experiencing this form of gender dysphoria typically begin by wearing women’s clothes, they later fantasize about having female body parts. This can act as a strong motivator for surgery down the line, according to Dr. Bailey. 

Rapid onset gender dysphoria, by contrast, usually only relates to biological females, and is determined by a sudden acknowledgment they may be trans with little to no prior signals.

Abigail Shrier, author of “Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters” told the documentary crew that, historically, gender dysphoria affected .01%, or roughly one in ten-thousand, males. The numbers were much smaller for females, affecting one in thirty thousand individuals. 

Today, those numbers have risen enormously, with 1 in 20 college-aged women now identifying as trans. 

“In the UK where they have centralized medical care, and they can see the numbers more easily, there have been reports of a 4000% spike in the referrals of young biological women to the national gender service for hormones, followed by surgical intervention,” Shrier revealed. 


Duncan herself has noticed this rapid increase, and hopes that she and others may act as a guiding light for young Americans, often pushed by educators and other social influences, to believe that they are, indeed, transgender. 

“I’m two generations now away from this new culture that’s coming up and if we don’t have people who have gone down the path before them and fight for them, I’m not sure what’s going to happen,” she said. SOURCE

I really have no words to add to Tucker’s. When I read and watch the insanity which the Left want us to embrace as ‘normal’ – my mind immediately goes to the Word of God.

We are witnessing events which must happen in the last days. We were warned by Jesus that the world would be just as it is right now.


Here is what is important: