I wrote a piece back in June about having to go to Urgent Care (per my doctor) for a chest x-ray and Blood Work, but there was a hitch. He told me that I must get the PCR test done first. I had never had one of those tests done. Thankfully, they had stopped pushing the swab up into the blood/brain barrier so it was not very painful.
But this article will show you what I found out about the PCR swabs:
Ethylene Oxide, FDA PCR Swab Recall, & Strange Black Fibers That Move
Did you hear that the FDA just said Innova PCR Tests Are Dangerous & Inaccurate? Millions have been used and now they say that they can cause serious adverse health consequences or death?
At minute 10:30, see the hundreds of testing companies that the FDA is recalling. And learn WHY!
And at 20:30, hear Sir John Bell of Oxford University say, “These vaccines are unlikely to sterilize an entire population.”
Millions of people have been tested, some workers are tested regularly, and now they’re forcing these swab tests upon children for school or other reasons. Just like the PCR test,they cannot detect infection, so this places you or your loved one at risk.
The Nasopharyngeal swab sample is being taken from an extremely delicate area right at the blood/brain barrier. This medical procedure is a violent and invasive exploitation of your basic rights to choose what’s delivered into your body.
**For the FULL PROTOCOL (including NAC) to protect from transmission from the “V” and to help those who took the “V”, go here.
Harmful Effects of Ethylene Oxide
In the industry, it is widely known that exposure to Ethylene Oxide causes lymphoma, 7 cancers, neurotoxicity, and an increase in numbers of miscarriages. (source)
And how interesting is that— that those last symptoms stated are the exact same symptoms of Covid-19 itself!
Most hospitals and testing facilities buy from China which use EO sterilization for masks and test swabs: here, here, here, here, and I could list more ad infinitum!
Please understand that you are sticking a carcinogenic ethylene oxide coated swab up to to the most vulnerable part your skull (the sella turcica) without knowing what it may do to you long term.
Saliva testing is known to perform at the same levels. A study involving 5900 participants shows that saliva-based testing detected positive COVID infections 83% of the time. Nasal swabs detected them 85% of the time.
The same study also revealed that saliva testing shows 99% accuracy in detecting negative cases.
Did we really think that a “Super drug” taken orally for Covid would be safe? Why in the world would we assume that when the Jabs are killing and maiming people?
I imagine that this will appeal to those who are afraid of needles, but unfortunately these people should be more afraid of the nefarious intentions of the Big Pharma Cartel!!
Brethren, this is a different world in which we live. The powers that be (Globalists) are set on depopulation of planet earth. We MUST view those in charge (Globalists) as satanically driven, demon possessed monsters, who are devoid of compassion or ethical behavior. These people belong to the evil one and they do his bidding.
Their plans for the human race are ALWAYS nefarious, so do not be hoodwinked into thinking that they care for our wellbeing.
As it turns out, all the scientists and doctors who insisted that Merck’s “revolutionary” COVID drug molnupiravir is extremely safe weren’t faithfully adhering to “the science” after all. Because according to a report published Thursday by Barron’s, some scientists are worried that the drug – which purportedly cut hospitalizations in half during a study that was cut short – could cause cancer or birth defects.
It’s perfectly understandable why Merck might choose to play down this safety risk: assuming it’s approved, the drug is widely expected to be one of “the most lucrative drugs ever” – which is one reason why Merck’s shares soared into double-digit territory after the announcement.
As we reported earlier this week, Merck and its “partner” Ridgeback Biotherapeutics will profit immensely by charging customers up to 40x what it costs to make the drug, which Ridgeback originally licensed from Emory University for an “undisclosed sum”. The drug was developed with funding from the federal government.
According to Barron’s, some scientists who have studied the drug believe that its method of suppressing the virus could potentially run amok within the body.
Some scientists who have studied the drug warn, however, that the method it uses to kill the virus that causes Covid-19 carries potential dangers that could limit the drug’s usefulness.
Molnupiravir works by incorporating itself into the genetic material of the virus, and then causing a huge number of mutations as the virus replicates, effectively killing it. In some lab tests, the drug has also shown the ability to integrate into the genetic material of mammalian cells, causing mutations as those cells replicate.
If that were to happen in the cells of a patient being treated with molnupiravir, it could theoretically lead to cancer or birth defects.
In particular, Raymond Schinazi, a professor of pediatrics and the director of biochemical pharmacology at Emory who studied the drug while it was being developed, and published a number of papers on NHC, the compound that’s the active ingredient in the drug. He published a paper that showed the drug can produce a reaction like the one described above, and insisted it shouldn’t be given to young people – especially pregnant women – without more data.
Schinazi told Barron’s that he did not believe that molnupiravir should be given to pregnant women, or to young people of reproductive age, until more data is available. Merck’s trials of molnupiravir have excluded pregnant women; the scientists running the trial asked male participants to “abstain from heterosexual intercourse” while taking the drug, according to the federal government website that tracks clinical trials.
Barron’s even shared a paper published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases in May by Schinazi and scientists at the University of North Carolina which reported that NHC can cause mutations in animal cell cultures in a lab test designed to detect such mutations – something Merck claims it has tested for. The paper’s authors concluded that the risks for molnupiravir “may not be zero”.
Merck told Barron’s that it has run “extensive tests” on animals which it says show that this shouldn’t be an issue. “The totality of the data from these studies indicates that molnupiravir is not mutagenic or genotoxic in in-vivo mammalian systems,” a Merck spokesman said.
Still, scientists and doctors who have studied NHC say that Merck needs to “be careful,” and it’s not just Schinazi warning about the drug’s potential risks.
Dr. Shuntai Zhou, a scientist at the Swanstrom Lab at UNC, said “there is a concern that this will cause long-term mutation effects, even cancer.”
Zhou says that he is certain that the drug will integrate itself into the DNA of mammalian hosts. “Biochemistry won’t lie,” he says. “This drug will be incorporated in the DNA.”
Merck hasn’t yet released any data from its animal studies, but the scientists believe that it would take long-term studies to show that the drug is truly totally safe.
“Proceed with caution and at your own peril,” wrote Raymond Schinazi, a professor of pediatrics and the director of the division of biochemical pharmacology at the Emory University School of Medicine, who has studied NHC for decades, in an email to Barron’s.
Analysts are already warning that these questions about the drug’s safety suggest the reaction in Merck’s shares was a little “overblown”, to say the least. Investors apparently were so eager for a new “pandemic panacea” (now that the mRNA jabs have proven to be much less effective than advertised) that they didn’t ask too many questions about safety, or even question the paucity of data. One analyst for SVB Leerink Dr. Geoffrey Porges described investors’ reaction from Friday as “wishful thinking”.
Even once the FDA authorizes the drug, Dr. Porges believes it will come with strict limitations on who can and can’t use it. “I think it is effectively going to be a controlled substance”, Dr. Porges said, adding that the risks to pregnant women, or women who may soon become pregnant, could present thorny problems for the FDA’s advisory committee reviewing the drug.
Given that the safety risks of the drug seem well-documented already, Wall Street’s gushing about the drug’s prospects – “it really is THAT good”,one analyst insisted – seems like an idiotic blunder in retrospect. The product of what one might call “magical thinking”.Source
Brothers and sisters in Christ, I know that there are pastors and Bible teachers out there who are taking the “Let’s trust NIH and our Government” approach. This writer believes that this is foolhardy and reckless. We have enough information about the powers that be to form an educated conclusion: They want us DEAD!
I am very sorry if you feel that this is not a Christian attitude. Personally, I liken this to my people boarding the death trains in Germany after being told that the trains would bring them to a safer place.
I have been writing articles for over 6 years about Bill Gates and his desire to drastically depopulate the earth. His time has come. It gives me chills to think about his “joy” at what is happening at this very moment. His dreams are coming to fruition.
Always remember the first Georgia Guide Stone commandment :
