HUGE!! AUSSIE COURT RULES MANDATORY JABS VIOLATE FREE & INFORMED CONSENT & THEREFORE BREAK THE LAW (AMENDED)

Further research into the video posted by this Australian MP indicates she seems to have incorrectly interpreted the Commission’s ruling that she cites. Upon my reading the document outlining this decision and further reflection, her optimism, in my opinion, does not seem warranted. Please take what she says with that appropriate grain of salt.

***A special thanks to my co-writer, Gary Ritter, for helping me with this post. You are such a great brother in Christ!

Australian Member of Parliament, Tanya Davis, is reading from a ruling that was just handed down from Fair Work Commission’s decision that declares mandatory jabs as a condition of employment to be against the law. The ruling states that politicians pushing for mandatory “vaccinations” are not doing so to protect public health.

This ruling can effectively have the effect of ending Covid-Tyranny in Australia, and hopefully be the first legal victory that’ll initiate a domino effect that will bring this nightmare to an end around the world.

This is HUGE, Patriots.
Let’s make it go VIRAL
o7
We Are The News Now, so let’s do our duty

[2021] FWCFB 6015 FAIR WORK COMMISSION DECISION
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/html/2021fwcfb6015.htm

A small victory, but a victory nonetheless!

Hallelujah and MARANATHA!!

41 thoughts on “HUGE!! AUSSIE COURT RULES MANDATORY JABS VIOLATE FREE & INFORMED CONSENT & THEREFORE BREAK THE LAW (AMENDED)

    1. Lynda

      Bravo!!! I was really scared for my grandchildren in Australia. Finally,
      some good news and common sense!! I hope this will help save my job in Canada in Healthcare. Thank you so much!-

      1. Blair

        They sure help if only the bad guys have guns!! Look around the world to see. More knives are used to kill than guns. Are you going to ban knives? Use your common sense. You don’t want only the bad guys to have guns.

      2. go

        I plead with you all NOT to be overwhelmed! Get out to the garden for a few minutes, hours, turn everything off! I know the BIG World Seems to be up- heaving.. but you “dont have to” make it your world..!!! Your world is your house, garden , kids, partner, food, relaxing, love, hugs, laughter.. keep it simple. That “pure Energy you emit “outward will do more good for all in your circle” than Anger and fear. Focus in..read a book..pull some weeds.. lay down on the grass, have a bath, whatever it takes, cmon guys ..you and i and all are fkn worth it as we are LOVE, COMPASSION, EMPATHY, HOPE , FREEDOM and we will get through this. As a Pygmy eats an Elephant..little bits at a time. xxx

      3. Marais

        You know Jack about history and total mass murder by several governments in history. Do your homework before opening your trap. Fair dinkum mate

    2. Shane Stuart

      Now I see from the day our weapons were taken this agenda has been in background. Australia’s people need to unite vaxxed or unvaxed let’s not let this untrustworthy leaders be voted back in. Australia stop trusting the government PLEASE OR WE ARE DOOMED.
      From an Veteran who loved his country… not anymore I served, now I’m protestor for our freedoms.

  1. Jeff Menard

    Good news. Instead of using a flawed PCR test , what about an anti-body test to establish natural immunity for the unvaxxed who had recovered from the CV infection?

      1. Joséphine

        I have always believed they were wrong Ignorant and are after CONTROL not the safety of our beautiful Australia thank you for opening their eyes if they chose to be open to the truth,

    1. Gayle Zurak

      The antibody test will only show antibodies for maybe 3-4 months after covid whereas the T cell detect test will show your immunity most likely for the rest of your life.

  2. Pingback: HUGE!! AUSSIE COURT RULES MANDATORY JABS VIOLATE FREE & INFORMED CONSENT & THEREFORE BREAK THE LAW | ajmarciniak

  3. mb

    It’s not a political decision, you have to right to decide on what happens to yr body. Especially as it’s about a weak virus (mutated), and a injection in testing.

  4. Pingback: What if the current #flu_demic is just a test-run : #Frankenstein may release MORE deadly bioweapons | (On)sensitiewe Woord

  5. Ruth Freeland

    Unfortunately, it was only one of three decisions in the Fair Work Commission – the other two went against the complainant. Hopefully, a court case will decide in line with the Deputy Commissioner’s finding. There are some such cases in the Supreme Court at this time.

  6. Pingback: ROOTS OF SUFFERING, AUSSIE COURT RULES MANDATORY JABS VIOLATE FREE & INFORMED CONSENT AND MORE – Inspiration

  7. Please note this is NOT A RULING. It is a dissenting opinion offered by one commissioner on this case. The other 2 commissioners did not uphold the appeal and the implication is that vaccine mandates can be applied legally in the workplace. This document is effectively meaningless. MP Davies has got it wrong promoting it as a ruling and as having any significance.

    1. As I’ve said before to others saying the same thing – this was sent to me by a sister in Christ in Australia; and the prayer of my heart is that the Lord will use this to show the world what is happening in that country. I would appreciate it if you would send me updates with sources and links. God bless you…..

      1. Lucky

        If you going to have a blog that claims absolute truth start with accurate posts that are not misinformation like a number of people have already advised.

      2. Well, Lucky……you could help me a lot with fixing this. Would you please write up a piece which spells out the TRUTH and provide sources and links? I will place this on an edited version of this article. I do want absolute truth, and I thought that the person who sent this to me from Australia gave me the whole truth. I will even give you attribution. What do you say? I would really appreciated the help. Thank you.

        This is from co-writer Gary Ritter:

        As some of you are aware, I’ve begun posting my Bible commentary writings on the Absolute Truth from the Word of God blog. Geri asked me to take a look at this video and the Australian Fair Work Commission’s ruling because of the controversy that seems to have erupted. So, here is my layman’s interpretation of what’s going on.

        After having watched Member of Parliament Tanya Davis discuss this ruling by the Australian Fair Work Commission, it seems to me that she was overly optimistic in communicating the implications of this case concerning the employee who refused to take the flu vaccine as a condition of employment.

        The Commission by a 2 -1 vote ruled against employee Jennifer Kimber. The two-person majority effectively labeled her an anti-vaxxer. She refused the flu vaccine, and by implication in their thinking, she would also have refused the COVID shot. Her employer was justified in firing her.

        What Tanya Davis quoted was the minority dissent in the Commission vote by Deputy President Dean. Her opposition to the ruling would be similar in effect to a Supreme Court decision in America. If the court majority voted 5-4 against something, and Justice Clarence Thomas was among the minority and also issued a dissenting opinion, that’s all it would be, i.e. an opinion. The majority decided and that ruling would stand regardless what Justice Thomas might think.

        It seems to me that the dissenting vote here will become simply an afterthought. As I see it – and I could certainly be wrong – the excitement that Tanya Davis displayed wasn’t warranted. The minority opinion will likely be soon forgotten in Australia’s zeal to continue being the testbed and model for tyrannical policies in preparation for the New World Order, a.k.a. the Great Reset.

        I’m not really sure why Ms. Davis was so upbeat about this ruling being a first strike against Australia’s mandate requiring the COVID “vaccine” as a condition of employment. As I read it from my non-lawyerly perspective, there’s no there, there.

        Given how Tanya Davis presents this information, it’s easy to initially believe all that she says. However, it does require perusing the entire Fair Work Commission document to get the whole story. For those of you harshly judging Geri for posting this and being hopeful; chill out. There isn’t much good news in the world these days, and this appeared like it might be. It doesn’t seem that way to me, but don’t kill the messenger.

        Our only real hope is in Jesus Christ. Do you know Him? Salvation in His Name is the best Good News there can possibly be. Why? Because all this evil will come to pass, but God is the ultimate judge. Only if you look to the One who can deliver your soul from death will you escape the horrors to come. Don’t delay until it’s too late!

    1. I am desperately trying to figure out if this is true or only partly true. As soon as I find out, I will amend this post and certainly apologize for any erroneous information

      1. Gary Ritter
        As some of you are aware, I’ve begun posting my Bible commentary writings on the Absolute Truth from the Word of God blog. Geri asked me to take a look at this video and the Australian Fair Work Commission’s ruling because of the controversy that seems to have erupted. So, here is my layman’s interpretation of what’s going on.

        After having watched Member of Parliament Tanya Davis discuss this ruling by the Australian Fair Work Commission, it seems to me that she was overly optimistic in communicating the implications of this case concerning the employee who refused to take the flu vaccine as a condition of employment.

        The Commission by a 2 -1 vote ruled against employee Jennifer Kimber. The two-person majority effectively labeled her an anti-vaxxer. She refused the flu vaccine, and by implication in their thinking, she would also have refused the COVID shot. Her employer was justified in firing her.

        What Tanya Davis quoted was the minority dissent in the Commission vote by Deputy President Dean. Her opposition to the ruling would be similar in effect to a Supreme Court decision in America. If the court majority voted 5-4 against something, and Justice Clarence Thomas was among the minority and also issued a dissenting opinion, that’s all it would be, i.e. an opinion. The majority decided and that ruling would stand regardless what Justice Thomas might think.

        It seems to me that the dissenting vote here will become simply an afterthought. As I see it – and I could certainly be wrong – the excitement that Tanya Davis displayed wasn’t warranted. The minority opinion will likely be soon forgotten in Australia’s zeal to continue being the testbed and model for tyrannical policies in preparation for the New World Order, a.k.a. the Great Reset.

        I’m not really sure why Ms. Davis was so upbeat about this ruling being a first strike against Australia’s mandate requiring the COVID “vaccine” as a condition of employment. As I read it from my non-lawyerly perspective, there’s no there, there.

        Given how Tanya Davis presents this information, it’s easy to initially believe all that she says. However, it does require perusing the entire Fair Work Commission document to get the whole story. For those of you harshly judging Geri for posting this and being hopeful; chill out. There isn’t much good news in the world these days, and this appeared like it might be. It doesn’t seem that way to me, but don’t kill the messenger.

        Our only real hope is in Jesus Christ. Do you know Him? Salvation in His Name is the best Good News there can possibly be. Why? Because all this evil will come to pass, but God is the ultimate judge. Only if you look to the One who can deliver your soul from death will you escape the horrors to come. Don’t delay until it’s too late!

      2. The last name you have given yourself on this forum speaks volumes to the readers. It is disgusting and hence the reason why you are forever banned from my site.

  8. Gary Ritter

    As some of you are aware, I’ve begun posting my Bible commentary writings on the Absolute Truth from the Word of God blog. Geri asked me to take a look at this video and the Australian Fair Work Commission’s ruling because of the controversy that seems to have erupted. So, here is my layman’s interpretation of what’s going on.

    After having watched Member of Parliament Tanya Davis discuss this ruling by the Australian Fair Work Commission, it seems to me that she was overly optimistic in communicating the implications of this case concerning the employee who refused to take the flu vaccine as a condition of employment.

    The Commission by a 2 -1 vote ruled against employee Jennifer Kimber. The two-person majority effectively labeled her an anti-vaxxer. She refused the flu vaccine, and by implication in their thinking, she would also have refused the COVID shot. Her employer was justified in firing her.

    What Tanya Davis quoted was the minority dissent in the Commission vote by Deputy President Dean. Her opposition to the ruling would be similar in effect to a Supreme Court decision in America. If the court majority voted 5-4 against something, and Justice Clarence Thomas was among the minority and also issued a dissenting opinion, that’s all it would be, i.e. an opinion. The majority decided and that ruling would stand regardless what Justice Thomas might think.

    It seems to me that the dissenting vote here will become simply an afterthought. As I see it – and I could certainly be wrong – the excitement that Tanya Davis displayed wasn’t warranted. The minority opinion will likely be soon forgotten in Australia’s zeal to continue being the testbed and model for tyrannical policies in preparation for the New World Order, a.k.a. the Great Reset.

    I’m not really sure why Ms. Davis was so upbeat about this ruling being a first strike against Australia’s mandate requiring the COVID “vaccine” as a condition of employment. As I read it from my non-lawyerly perspective, there’s no there, there.

    Given how Tanya Davis presents this information, it’s easy to initially believe all that she says. However, it does require perusing the entire Fair Work Commission document to get the whole story. For those of you harshly judging Geri for posting this and being hopeful; chill out. There isn’t much good news in the world these days, and this appeared like it might be. It doesn’t seem that way to me, but don’t kill the messenger.

    Our only real hope is in Jesus Christ. Do you know Him? Salvation in His Name is the best Good News there can possibly be. Why? Because all this evil will come to pass, but God is the ultimate judge. Only if you look to the One who can deliver your soul from death will you escape the horrors to come. Don’t delay until it’s too late!

  9. Terri

    Hope this filters across the world.
    About time the law stood for what it is intended rather then letting politicians and business owners run around claiming the they are medical experts.

  10. Tom Grimshaw

    This is a complete misconstruing of the decision. Item [43] On the basis of these reasons, the Commissioner was not satisfied that Ms Kimber’s dismissal was harsh, unjust or unreasonable, and dismissed her application.

    1. From Gary Ritter – a co-writer on this blog site

      As some of you are aware, I’ve begun posting my Bible commentary writings on the Absolute Truth from the Word of God blog. Geri asked me to take a look at this video and the Australian Fair Work Commission’s ruling because of the controversy that seems to have erupted. So, here is my layman’s interpretation of what’s going on.

      After having watched Member of Parliament Tanya Davis discuss this ruling by the Australian Fair Work Commission, it seems to me that she was overly optimistic in communicating the implications of this case concerning the employee who refused to take the flu vaccine as a condition of employment.

      The Commission by a 2 -1 vote ruled against employee Jennifer Kimber. The two-person majority effectively labeled her an anti-vaxxer. She refused the flu vaccine, and by implication in their thinking, she would also have refused the COVID shot. Her employer was justified in firing her.

      What Tanya Davis quoted was the minority dissent in the Commission vote by Deputy President Dean. Her opposition to the ruling would be similar in effect to a Supreme Court decision in America. If the court majority voted 5-4 against something, and Justice Clarence Thomas was among the minority and also issued a dissenting opinion, that’s all it would be, i.e. an opinion. The majority decided and that ruling would stand regardless what Justice Thomas might think.

      It seems to me that the dissenting vote here will become simply an afterthought. As I see it – and I could certainly be wrong – the excitement that Tanya Davis displayed wasn’t warranted. The minority opinion will likely be soon forgotten in Australia’s zeal to continue being the testbed and model for tyrannical policies in preparation for the New World Order, a.k.a. the Great Reset.

      I’m not really sure why Ms. Davis was so upbeat about this ruling being a first strike against Australia’s mandate requiring the COVID “vaccine” as a condition of employment. As I read it from my non-lawyerly perspective, there’s no there, there.

      Given how Tanya Davis presents this information, it’s easy to initially believe all that she says. However, it does require perusing the entire Fair Work Commission document to get the whole story. For those of you harshly judging Geri for posting this and being hopeful; chill out. There isn’t much good news in the world these days, and this appeared like it might be. It doesn’t seem that way to me, but don’t kill the messenger.

      Our only real hope is in Jesus Christ. Do you know Him? Salvation in His Name is the best Good News there can possibly be. Why? Because all this evil will come to pass, but God is the ultimate judge. Only if you look to the One who can deliver your soul from death will you escape the horrors to come. Don’t delay until it’s too late!

  11. Pingback: AUSSIE COURT RULES MANDATORY JABS VIOLATE FREE & INFORMED CONSENT – Covid19: Alternative Perspectives

Leave a Reply