After Fauci Lies to Congress Under Oath About ‘Gain of Function’ Research: The TRUTH Comes Out

This man truly IS The Godfather of GOFR (Gain of Function Research) and all of his lies will come back to bite him. Documented proof exists of the actions of this madman. Run as he may, and lie to our government; he will eventually be caught, and hopefully be tried under the Nuremberg Code for experiments done on the human race.

If Fauci is not caught in this life and he does not repent, he will stand before the Great White Throne of Judgment.


Fauci Reportedly Relaunched NIH Gain-of-Function Research without Consulting White House

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, addresses the daily coronavirus task force briefing at the White House, April 17, 2020. (Leah Millis/Reuters)

Washington Post columnist Josh Rogin, who has done invaluable work in calling attention to the possibility that COVID-19 originated in a Wuhan lab, broke some news during his appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience on Tuesday.

After laying out the circumstantial evidence that COVID originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), Rogin explained why Dr. Anthony Fauci, like many in the world of virology research, has a vested professional interest in downplaying the likelihood that so-called gain-of-function research — of the kind performed at the Wuhan lab — not only failed to prevent the ongoing global pandemic but actually may have played a hand in unleashing it.

“The Godfather of [gain-of-function virology research], the head of the pyramid, is a guy you may have heard of called Anthony Fauci,” Rogin said. “So, Anthony Fauci, the hero of the pandemic, is the most important person in the world of gain-of-function research there is . . . Basically, he is the one disbursing all the grants for this, he is the one who pushed to turn it back on after Obama turned it off, that’s another crazy story, he turned it back on without really consulting the White House.”

“He consulted the Office of Science and Technology Policy, which is part of the White House, but the White House put a pause on it and he undid the pause,” Rogin continued. “The details are a little sketchy. I’m not saying he did anything necessarily wrong or illegal, but I’m saying that a lot of people that I know inside the Trump administration had no idea that he had turned this back on. He found a way to turn it back on in the mess of the Trump administration because the Trump administration is full of a bunch of clowns, so you could get things done if you knew how to work the system.”

As Rogin himself admits, “the details are a little sketchy,” and we’ll have to take a look at the sourcing included in whatever article this piece of news appears in before alleging any wrongdoing. But Rogin has banked significant credibility by questioning the mainstream COVID-origin consensus. He dealt a significant blow to the media’s near-religious faith in the natural-transmission theory by reporting on the existence of 2018 State Department cables that raised concerns about the lack of safety protocols at the Wuhan lab, which was performing gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses at the time.

The Obama administration suspended gain-of-function research in 2014 after a series of lab accidents involving pathogens at CDC headquarters in Georgia.

Nature article from October 2014 lays out the rationale for the suspension:

Critics of such work argue that it is unnecessarily dangerous and risks accidentally releasing viruses with pandemic potential — such as an engineered H5N1 influenza virus that easily spreads between ferrets breathing the same air12. In 2012, such concerns prompted a global group of flu researchers to halt gain-of-function experiments for a year (see Nature; 2012). The debate reignited in July, after a series of lab accidents involving mishandled pathogens at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia.

The White House’s abrupt move seems to be a response to renewed lobbying by gain-of-function critics who wanted such work suspended and others who sought to evaluate its risks and benefits without disrupting existing research.

According to Rogin, much of the gain-of-function research that was being conducted in the U.S. prior to the moratorium subsequently migrated to China — and EcoHealth Alliance, the U.S. research nonprofit, secured its grant to funnel NIH money to the WIV in 2015, less than a year after the moratorium was put in place. If Fauci did indeed use bureaucratic maneuvering to resume gain-of-function research on U.S. soil, as Rogin alleges, he has some explaining to do — even if domestic research isn’t to blame for our current pandemic. Source

Brethren, we cannot trust these bad actors in the Covid debacle. Deception abounds just as our Lord Jesus told us it would. Although the jab is not the Mark of the Beast, it certainly is a precursor to it. We see how easily the world can be influenced and brainwashed.

Satan knows that his days are numbered. He is truly the puppet master.

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom B’Yeshua


4 thoughts on “After Fauci Lies to Congress Under Oath About ‘Gain of Function’ Research: The TRUTH Comes Out

  1. Rae L

    Thank you.for all your Truth Filled Articles.Time us running short. Maranatha 🌺📖✝️

  2. Mark V

    His jesuit training is evident in his desire to lie in order to promote his societal gain of power and control. Furthermore, his association with the jesuit pope gives him absolution both by association and his belief in indulgences. Fauci is no different than Dr. Faustus. Both dealt in “magic” or sorcery which involves change of natural to an unatural. Demonic deception. He would have to depart from his cult before any true repentance would be possible. Having family that fail to admit the apostasy of catholicism, I find it even more difficult for the trained jesuit to amend his ways. “If the righteous are scarcely saved, what about the ungodly and sinner?” I will continue to pray knowing that God desires this.

  3. Moira Wood

    According to Professor of Immunology Dolores Cahill: The molecular structure of the Covid 19 virus shows that it has been man made. She says:
    “In general these viruses have 30,000 nucleotides, but in this SARS Cov 2 – there’s actually a stretch of 12 nucleotides that are not present in the other viruses, and this would not happen naturally.”

    “This is published……in peer-reviewed papers, and in Nature Medicine Magazine: ‘The proximal origin of SARS Cov 2’…… that this was actually inserted into the original SARS viruses back in 2006…….

    “It is well known that this has happened ……. There have been several publications about this, but what’s most important here is that in Beijing, from the lab in Wuhan there was a publication in October 2019 that discusses this particular modification: in October 2019.”

    Regarding these 12 nucleotides: “ there is no homology to the other similar coronaviruses in this region. And so it’s been publicized that this was actually inserted into the original SARS viruses back in 2006.”

    Research, related to this virus, was originally done in America, in the North Carolina labs, and there was a moratorium on this type of research… it’s called ‘gain-of-function’ research

    “The US Government under Obama and with approval from Dr Fauci, moved the Research from the North Carolina lab in the USA to China. Obama authorized $3.7 million U.S. tax dollars to be used at the Wuhan Institute of Virology to utilize corona viruses in bats in 2015.” (Kevin McCullough)

    “……..the same researcher that was doing this research in America, in North Carolina, moved to the Wuhan lab, published about this insertion, and then they were able to identify it in patients and it was published in Nature Medicine. And what this symptom does……it’s called a furin – it makes it easier for the virus to get into the body.

    Without this little extra 12 nucleotides, the spike would engaged with the ACE receptor, but when it has this additional furin receptor, it has another way of getting into it.” “…..that region has no homology to all of the normal corona viruses, so it would be expected that something that did not occur naturally.”

    “And we now know, first of all, there were no bats for sale ever in this seafood market, and also a PhD student from this lab died…… seems in Wuhan, that people started to get the initial symptoms, after her funeral……….”
    “It looks like that it was actually circulating…..sometime between October, November, December in China; there was already a publication, about forty people who were tested, that was published in China on the 2nd of January.

    To have people already tested and in a publication by the second of January 2020, it would have meant that…. these started probably in November.
    So this is just to say that there is an issue with this virus.”

    (Prof Dolores Cahill: Debunking the Narrative)

Comments are closed.