BUSTED: Lockdowns Every Two Years or the Planet Gets It? The Guardian ‘Accidentally’ Suggests Shutdowns Every Two Years to Meet Paris Climate Goals

Someone is in big trouble at the The Guardian

From thelibertybeacon.com

ER Editor: We also recommend this RT piece from Feb. 27 titled World Economic Forum shouted down on Twitter for suggesting Covid-19 lockdowns ‘improved cities all over the world’. Like The Guardian below, the WEF outed themselves. Journalist Helen Buyniski mentions this story below.


The Guardian accidentally confirmed the suspicions of a whole lot of conspiracy theorists with an article suggesting a “global lockdown every two years” was needed to meet Paris climate goals. The title was quickly changed.

Lockdowns or the planet gets it? Guardian ‘accidentally’ suggests Covid-like shutdowns every 2 years to meet Paris climate goals

©  web.archive.org / The Guardian

If carbon dioxide emissions don’t drop by the equivalent of a worldwide lockdown “roughly every two years” for the next decade, the earth will heat to apocalyptic levels, a team of researchers at the University of East Anglia warned in a Nature article published Wednesday.

This apparently so excited a certain strain of climate fanatic on the Guardian staff, that they originally posted the piece under the title “Global lockdown every two years needed to meet Paris CO2 goals – study.” After being dragged mercilessly for such fear porn, the headline was changed to “Equivalent of Covid emissions drop needed every two years – study,” with an explainer that “experts say” that “equivalent falls in emissions over a decade” would be “required to keep safe limits of global heating.”

Despite calling for “completely different methods” to achieve and lock in the emissions drop from the pandemic, lead researcher Corinne Le Quéré nevertheless insisted that climate change couldn’t be a “side issue. It can’t be about one law or policy, it has to be put at the heart of all policy.”

Every strategy and every plan from every government must be consistent with tackling climate change.

While Le Quéré didn’t come out and suggest people be arbitrarily deprived of their liberties every two years in order to please a climate model (ER: which, according to our research, has no credible scientific data to back it up), the other “strategic actions” she mentioned to keep some of the gains of the pandemic were already being implemented – and in many cases had been implemented for years. From city planning to incentivize “active transport” (walking and cycling) and growing public transportation, to promoting remote work where possible, her suggestions were not exactly new – and unlikely to convince anyone they were sufficient enough.

“There is a real contradiction between what governments are saying they are doing to do [to generate a green recovery], and what they are doing,” Le Quéré told the Guardian, calling the phenomenon “very worrisome.”

Her co-researcher Glen Peters was more explicit in what latitude countries should have to move away from fossil fuels on their own time, calling for structural changes” to move economies toward renewable energy.

Some on social media, seeing the “quiet part” said out loud on the first edition of the Guardian article, had an “I told you so” moment. The threat of ‘climate lockdowns’ has been alternately presented and “debunked” by mainstream media for months.

…others at first assumed it had to be satire, because no one would post something that on-the-nose –

…except maybe for the World Economic Forum, which actually posted in praise of what lockdowns had done to cities – presumably turned them into uninhabitable hives of snitches where one can’t even take in a Broadway show anymore – earlier this week, before removing its tweet under public pressure.

The WEF had posted a video praising the “silence” and clearer air – and lack of humans, though they didn’t say that part out loud.

From web.archive.org <for those who would like to view the original piece from The Guardian


Brethren, Climate Change (which used to be called Global Warming) has always been a ruse to control the whole world’s economies. The Globalist powers that be have not forgotten about it. It ties right in very nicely with the Plandemic.

We see now that these bad actors chose to destroy the Nations’ economies with Covid -19. There are many pieces to this puzzle and they are fitting together nicely for Globalists.

But here is what we know:

But, beloved, do not forget this one thing, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance.

2 Peter 3:8-9

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom B’Yeshua


4 thoughts on “BUSTED: Lockdowns Every Two Years or the Planet Gets It? The Guardian ‘Accidentally’ Suggests Shutdowns Every Two Years to Meet Paris Climate Goals

  1. lulie

    SUCH hypocritical and satanic mind controll: First, lockdown havent changed a darn thing, if anything we have worse weather and anomalies Matthew 24 incoming , because of the Super Grand solar Minimum, a recorded phenomenon for 1000’s of years. It just happens its NOW again, but its the SUN cycle, Not co2 , its not anything they claim IF IF You persue science. just like the covid hoax; masks are useless, dangerous and .research proves it, lockdowns are a sham and very bad for humans. Bt these ‘people’ in this worlds kingdom are non human, and have proved it, but…the masses still trust them! Father have mercy…

Comments are closed.