Globalist Henry Kissinger: “Coronavirus Will Forever Alter the World Order”

WOW. Is Kissinger like 110 years old?  These globalists and Illuminati characters must take some really potent life extension vitamins!

I’m going to publish what Kissinger said, and then in between, I will insert my commentary in “blue.” When the brilliant writer from newamerican speaks – there will be no need for my words.


The establishment insider called for vaccines, world government, and big government socialism in response to the coronavirus outbreak.

The global elites have spoken.

Henry Kissinger (shown), the globalist-minded diplomat who played a pivotal role shaping U.S. foreign policy under the administrations of Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford, has solemnly declared that the global order must and will change dramatically in response to the worldwide COVID-19 outbreak.

In a Wall Street Journal op-ed entitled “The Coronavirus Pandemic Will Forever Alter the World Order,” Kissinger, calls for greater international cooperation in preventing and addressing future pandemics, arguing that the individual efforts of individual nations are insufficient to deal with crises of this magnitude.

“When the Covid-19 pandemic is over, many countries’ institutions will be perceived as having failed,” Kissinger writes, insinuating that this will prime the public into not only accepting, but demanding, radical political change better able to protect them from infectious disease.

Oh, you think so, Henry? I’m thinking that when the civilized nations (that of course excludes China) look back at the Covid-19 pandemic, they will be astonished and outraged at “The Who” and their mismanagement of this crisis!

In the “post-coronavirus order,” Kissinger asserts:

Leaders are dealing with the crisis on a largely national basis, but the virus’s society-dissolving effects do not recognize borders. While the assault on human health will — hopefully — be temporary, the political and economic upheaval it has unleashed could last for generations. No country, not even the U.S., can in a purely national effort overcome the virus. Addressing the necessities of the moment must ultimately be coupled with a global collaborative vision and program. If we cannot do both in tandem, we will face the worst of each.

“No country…..NOT EVEN the U.S. can overcome the virus.” Well, Henry – If China, WHO and the U.N. had not thrown so many curve balls at the U.S. AND if the Globalist/Communist Democrats had not politicized the pandemic – blaming our president for most everything -I believe that the U.S. would have been the model nation for fighting Covid 19. Global Warming didn’t work out for you, huh? This is plan B. 

And if President Trump had not immediately banned travel to and from China when he did, we would be looking at almost 2 million more deaths. But of course, the Communist Democrats labeled him racist and xenophobic for saving all of those lives. 

Describing the effort needed as akin in scope to the Marshall Plan and the Manhattan Project, Kissinger, who famously said “power is the ultimate aphrodisiac,” proposes honing-in on three “domains” in building the post-virus world.

First, the German-born political scientist says, America must “shore up global resilience to infectious disease.” How? By developing new “technologies for infection control and commensurate vaccines across large populations.”

It should be noted that Bill Gates, the world’s richest man in the years he isn’t edged out by Jeff Bezos, plans to spend billions of dollars (and has already spent hundreds of millions) to develop a coronavirus vaccine.

Gates is a longtime insider of the globalist-socialist elite, perhaps one of its chief members, considering his vast wealth. He has called the free market “inept” at solving climate change (believing a global big government regime would do better) and was even inducted into Communist China’s elite Chinese Academy of Engineering.

The Gates are known proponents of population control, and Bill had a cozy relationship with establishment-connected sex trafficker Jeff Epstein, giving $2 million to MIT at the deceased money man’s request.

Are Bill Gates’ projects what Kissinger has in mind when he says we need “commensurate vaccines across large populations”?

It wouldn’t be surprising, considering the two men run in the same globalist circles. Gates works with the world-government-promoting Council on Foreign Relations, of which Kissinger is a member (as was Epstein).

And curiously, in October of last year, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation partnered with the World Economic Forum and the John Hopkins Center for Health Security in an “exercise” called Event 201, which calculated how the world would respond  to a coronavirus pandemic.    (Yep, you read that right -Emphasis mine)

Kissinger goes on to say that Step Two should be to “heal the wounds of the world economy.” Hearkening back to the 2008 financial crisis, Kissinger calls for programs to ameliorate chaos, suggesting the big government bailouts and government interventionism we witnessed in response to the Great Recession.

But Kissinger, ever the globalist, wants to make sure we don’t let coronavirus push us toward nationalism rather than internationalism. In his third “domain,” the 96-year-old says the pandemic “has prompted an anachronism, a revival of the walled city in an age when prosperity depends on global trade and movement of people.”

Kissinger wants the nations of the world to resist this urge, the urge of closed borders and national autonomy, and instead “safeguard the principles of the liberal world order,” i.e. a politically and economically integrated world in which nations submit to the authority of regional and international bodies such as the European Union and the United Nations.

Calling for restraint from all sides in this “epochal period,” Kissinger asserts that failure to preserve the liberal order “could set the world on fire.”

But perhaps the “world” that members of the elite like Henry Kissinger and Bill Gates want so badly to protect isn’t the one everyday citizens like us live in. source

***And George Soros lurks in the shadows to see if Kissinger’s words will frighten the world into DEMANDING Global Governance.

Brethren, we who study Bible Prophecy understand that the scenario of which these bad actors speak, WILL one day come to fruition. In order for the man of sin (Antichrist) to fool and rule the whole world, there must be a One World Government in place.

But as Christians – followers of Jesus Christ-we are to speak out against these demonically inspired men. I won’t stop speaking against them until there is no breath left in my body!

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom b’Yeshua




France Gifts Hezbollah With Four Deadly Battle Ships

I have never liked Emmanuel Macron.  He is arrogant and narcissistic. 

But now the Lord has shown me that he is not just full of himself – but full of Satan. When I read that he “donated” these powerful battleships to Hezbollah in Lebanon, Macron is now added to the list of leaders who want Israel wiped off the map.


France Donates Four Deadly Battle-Ships to Hezbollah – Report

Four French frigates entered Lebanese docks on Tuesday, March 24th.

According to a report by Al-Joumhouria, the ‘sophisticated’ French frigates are being ‘gifted’ to the Lebanese Military and will be joining the navy.

The Lebanese government, and hence its military are fully controlled by Hezbollah and the terror organization’s allies.

French ambassador to Beirut, Bruno Fouche, ‘personally supervised the operation’. Fouche even boarded one of the battleships that were delivered to Lebanon from the Toulon Naval Base in southern France. source

I have been reading that many are saying that “frigates” (type of ship) is not a battleship. My husband who served in the Marines and Army said that this type of ship can be used as a war ship. 

These ships can be equipped to launch missiles and destroy submarines.

Here is how wikipedia describes “frigates”


A frigate (/ˈfrɪɡət/) is a type of warship, having various sizes and roles over time.

In the 17th century, a frigate was any warship built for speed and maneuverability, the description often used being “frigate-built”. These could be warships carrying their principal batteries of carriage-mounted guns on a single deck or on two decks (with further smaller carriage-mounted guns usually carried on the forecastle and quarterdeck of the vessel). The term was generally used for ships too small to stand in the line of battle, although early line-of-battle ships were frequently referred to as frigates when they were built for speed.

In the 18th century, frigates were full-rigged ships, that is square-rigged on all three masts, they were built for speed and handiness, had a lighter armament than a ship of the line, and were used for patrolling and escort. In the definition adopted by the British Admiralty, they were rated ships of at least 28 guns, carrying their principal armaments upon a single continuous deck – the upper deck – while ships of the line possessed two or more continuous decks bearing batteries of guns.

In the late 19th century (beginning about 1858 with the construction of prototypes by the British and French navies), the armoured frigate was a type of ironclad warship that for a time was the most powerful type of vessel afloat. The term “frigate” was used because such ships still mounted their principal armaments on a single continuous upper deck.

In modern navies, frigates are used to protect other warships and merchant-marine ships, especially as anti-submarine warfare(ASW) combatants for amphibious expeditionary forces, underway replenishment groups, and merchant convoys. Ship classes dubbed “frigates” have also more closely resembled corvettes, destroyers, cruisers and even battleships. Some European navies such as the Dutch, French, German or Spanish ones use the term “frigate” for both their destroyers and frigates. The rank “frigate captain” derives from the name of this type of ship. source

I was reading the comments under the breakingisraelnews piece.  

I liked this one:

“What does Lebanon needs warships for except to pose a threat to Israel.”

Another commenter responded:

“At least they’ll be an easy target for Israeli missiles!”

How Can I Be Saved 

Shalom b’Yeshua