SECULAR JEWS: Jew Haters Will Not Care That You Are a Leftwing Liberal – Only That You Are a JEW

Recently, President Trump made an executive order to protect Jewish students on campuses nationwide. In the Order, Trump stated that funds will be withheld from campuses which turn a blind eye to rabid Anti Semitism.

Naturally, the Leftwing news sources are speaking out that this is an infringement on free speech.

The NY Slimes had this to say about the executive order:

From  nytimes.com.    (My commentary bolded)

Students across America wondered whether an executive order targeting anti-Semitism would “backfire” on Jewish students.

Backfire??  Think about how this same article, if it was written about Blacks, Hispanics, LGBTQ, Palestinians  or Muslims, would stir the hornet’s nest which is the Leftwing Media!  This is ludicrous!

PIC OF SPENCER

Credit…Desiree Rios for The New York Times

Ambivalent?  Yeah, NY Slimes – way to go with your LIES and false reporting.  SHAME on YOU!  Read on to see what Spencer REALLY said.

CHAPEL HILL, N.C. — Spencer Kaplan, a junior at Duke University, believes Israel has been unfairly targeted on campus, and he felt unsafe as a Jewish student after a swastika was found scrawled on a mural that Duke students had painted to honor the victims of last year’s massacre at a synagogue in Pittsburgh.    (emphasis added)

But Mr. Kaplan said he felt little comfort in President Trump’s executive order last week targeting anti-Semitism on college campuses.

NO NY Slimes – you’re putting words in Spencer’s mouth. He DIDN’T say that he felt “a little comfort.”  He stated that it could backfire on the Jews.  Oh – so the protection availed to Blacks, Muslims etc – that could backfire too??  

“I just fear it’s going to backfire for Jews,” said Mr. Kaplan, 20. “It reframes the debate from ‘is this anti-Semitic’ to ‘is this suppression of free speech.’”

ATTENTION:  The NY SLIMES is stating that people should be allowed to say what they feel under the protection of our First Amendment – Even if it’s about gays, Muslims,Palestinians, Blacks etc etc.  But we know that is NOT TRUE -don’t we brethren?  What they’re REALLY saying is “It’s okay to speak against Jews but not against other religions or LGBTQ groups – or about Palestinians.

While battles over limits on free speech and debates over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have long played out on American college campuses, students across the political spectrum said they worried about how Mr. Trump’s order would affect their daily lives, both in and out of the classroom.

First of all, it’s PRESIDENT TRUMP – not Mr. Trump. Secondly – your publication is such a Leftist rag, I’m surprised that you have not folded. But I’ve read that your fake news site is in troubled waters.

Mr. Trump’s order, which extends civil rights protections to Jews, is likely to bolster the Education Department’s investigations of accusations of anti-Jewish bias at several elite universities. The order last week came amid a rise in anti-Semitic attacks, and was issued the day after a deadly shooting at a kosher supermarket in New Jersey, which the authorities are investigating as an act of domestic terrorism.

Well GOOD!!! I’m GLAD that the Executive Order will bolster investigations into Jew hatred on campuses, especially since the anti Semitism is becoming more and more violent!!

And it came as racial and religious violence on college campuses is growing. According to a survey last year by the Anti-Defamation League, anti-Semitic incidents on college campuses rose to 204 in 2017 from 108 the prior year, an 89 percent increase.

Well DUHHHH……… This makes it crystal clear that PRESIDENT TRUMP’S Executive order came at the perfect time for Jewish students.

While many prominent Jewish and conservative groups, as well as members of the Israeli government, celebrated the executive order, college students were more nuanced in their responses.

Well, of course the college students are more “nuanced.”  They have been trained well by the Leftwing professors who do not hide their disdain of Israel.

Meagan Withers, a Jewish student at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, said she was initially supportive of Mr. Trump’s announcement. “Why wouldn’t you want Jewish students to feel safe?” she said, mentioning an incident last spring when anti-Semitic fliers were found in the university library.

But she worries the order oversimplifies the issue. Ms. Withers, who is active in the Jewish college outreach organization Hillel, said she developed a deeper understanding of her Jewish identity during a trip to Israel organized by Birthright Israel, which is partly funded by the Israeli government. She said Israelis and Palestinians presented both sides of the conflict, a balance that she added could be threatened by the executive order. source

HOG WASH!!  And that is to you, NY Slimes.

From YNETnews.com

Israeli official’s daughter faces threats at Columbia University

Ofir Dayan, daughter of Israel Consul General in New York Dani Dayan, who served in the IDF, tells the New York Post that she informed the university that she was being hectored and harassed by pro-Palestinian groups but that the higher education institution ‘blew us off … I thought the university would protect me.’

The daughter of Israel Consul General in New York Dani Dayan, who is studying at Columbia University says, that she is is worried for her personal safety after being harassed and threatened by the group Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), and that the school is failing to protect her.

Ofir Dayan, 24, who served as an officer in the IDF and had been stationed in the past in Gaza and Lebanon, described in an interview with the New York Post the SJP as being violent.

Majoring in Political Science as an undergraduate, Dayan said that she first discovered the hostile sentiments harbored for Israelis when she was having a conversation in Hebrew on the phone while in the lobby of the Middle East Institute.

Dayan recalled a similar incident in October 2017 when she was leaving an on-campus event for Israeli beauty queen Titi Aynaw with four members of the Students Supporting Israel (SSI)

“The ­moment (members of SJP) saw us, they started screaming their slogans with a microphone to intimidate us. There were at least 50 SJP members blocking the walkway,” she said.

“They were really angry and it was scary. I believed it would escalate to physical violence.”

According to Dayan, the university did nothing to tackle the intimidation and discipline those responsible, despite her filing a complaint about the incident to the Student Governing Board (SGB) in January this year in a letter that ­described, in part, “horrified and terrified Jewish students huddled together while surrounded by a raging mob . . . (exhibiting) physically threatening behavior.”

Pic of Dyan

Footage that she recorded of protesters being “hostile” also failed to move the SGB. After her father gave a speech on campus in February this year, the situation intensified as SJP activists set up checkpoints to intimidate people wishing to attend.

After Dayan revealed that the speaker was her father, she was subjected to vitriol and slurs and branded a “terrorists.”

Dayan’s pro-Israel group was told by the SGB that her complaint should be submitted to the newly formed adjudication board, a group managed by students who are supposed to mediate between parties in a dispute.

However, when the adjudication board got round to dealing with the complaint a month later, Dayan was informed that it could not be taken further because the incident in question occurred the previous semester. The board also told her that it was too complicated for them. The university administrator, who is an adviser to the board then dismissed the complaint in March, prompting the SSI to try and appeal it.

“They were blowing us off,” she said, angered further by the administrator telling her that the university could do nothing unless there was proof of anti-Semitism.

“I thought the university would protect me, but they didn’t do anything when (protesters) called me a terrorist,” Ofir said. “The school stands by as I’m harassed.”

While Professor Suzanne Goldberg, executive vice president for university life, said in a statement that “The safety and well-being of all of our students is fundamentally important” and that “we will always work with students who have concerns about their physical safety, allow debate on contentious questions where our students hold strong views, and provide essential personal and group support,” Dayan said that the lines is always blurred between criticism of Israel and anti-Semitism.

“There’s no difference between being anti-Israel and anti- Semitic (at Columbia),” she said, noting that she support freedom to protest.

SJP insisted in a statement that it “firmly stands against discrimination in all forms, including anti-Semitism” but failed to address Dayan’s complaints.

In a meeting last week between Dayan’s group and Professor Goldberg, the student requested protection from SJP and urged that disciplinary action be handed out against the SJP. However, Dayan said that her request was refused.

“(She) said that unless SJP gets ­violent, they can’t do anything,” said Dayan. “We have to wait until we’re beaten to call you? (The school) can protect me, but they choose not to.” source

So, there you go brethren.  The lies and and totally cavalier attitude of the NY Slimes to the plight of Jewish students on American college campuses being harassed speaks LOUDLY.   THEY JUST DON’T CARE.

But compare that to the account of the Israel student, Ofir Dyan, who is afraid to be on campus because she is ignored even in the midst of harassment by Jew haters. The authorities on campus turn a blind eye to Ofir’s concerns.

These so-called authorities are waiting for blood shed and then they will intervene.  Unbelievable.

Please pray for the Jewish students on our college campuses.  They all need our prayers desperately.

“And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed” (Genesis 12:3).  

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom b’Yeshua

MARANATHA!!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pastor Who Walked Away From His Church, Wife, and Faith in Christ Says TRUMP Has Been Damaging to the Gospel and Church

Can you say HYPOCRITE??

I mean REALLY Joshua Harris – did you really say this?  Unbelievable.

So, the man who wrote “I kissed Dating Goodbye” when he was 21, and pastored a Megachurch in Maryland for many years; but who also left his church, wife and faith in Christ behind – has the audacity to say this:

“SUPPORTING TRUMP HAS BEEN ‘INCREDIBLY DAMAGING TO THE GOSPEL AND CHURCH”

From Newsweek.com.    (My comments bolded)

A former megachurch pastor told Axios in a recent interview that the substantial support President Donald Trump has been receiving from evangelicals across the country has been “incredibly damaging to the Gospel and the church.”

So Joshua, you don’t think that the evils of this world; Abortion, Gay Marriage, Drag Queens (who are sexual predators) reading to small children in libraries across our country;  these things had nothing to do with “True Christians” aligning themselves with President Trump? This is NOT rocket science. Also, Trump’s relationship with Israel and the incredible things he has done for Israel – you don’t understand why Remnant Christians would support him?  Oh wait; you were never a Remnant Christian. 

In July, Joshua Harris, a leader in the Christian purity movement who wrote the book I Kissed Dating Goodbye as a 21-year-old, wrote in an Instagram post that he has “undergone a massive shift in regard to my faith in Jesus.”

So, Joshua, please tell us this:  WHY should we trust anything you say when you walked away from Jesus Christ and told the WORLD that you were no longer a Christian?  Did you feel that you had not done enough damage to the body of Christ?

“The popular phrase for this is ‘deconstruction,’ the biblical phrase is ‘falling away,'” he added. “By all the measurements that I have for defining a Christian, I am not a Christian.”

Well, you said that right.

Speaking to Mike Allen in a recent interview for Axios on HBO, Harris confirmed that he thinks the church made a mistake by becoming so identified with Trump.

Oh, so you want Christians to be aligned with the party of atheists (Dems) who “boo” God at their conventions, right?

“I think it’s incredibly damaging to the Gospel and to the church,” he said. “I don’t think it’s going to end well. And I think you look back at the old testament and the relationship between the prophet and really bad leaders and kings, and oftentimes it’s not something you unwind because it’s actually in the scriptures presented as God’s judgement on the false religion of the day.”

If I sound angry, it’s because I am. This man speaks of damage to the church and to the Gospel and calls the Christians who have supported President Trump a “False Religion.”  Now brethren, keep in mind the damage this man did to his wife, his church and to the Body of Christ!

When asked by Allen whether he thinks “Christians today, who embrace President Trump, are due for a judgement,” Harris responded: “I think that is the judgment.”

No Joshua. I’ll tell you what the Judgment is. You will stand before the Great White Throne Judgment and your name will NOT be found in the Book of Life. That means that the Judgment which will be passed on you will be eternity in Hell.  THAT is the judgment, Joshua.

“To have a leader like Trump, I think is in itself part of the indictment that this is the leader that you want and maybe deserve,” he added. “That represents a lot of who you are.”

Joshua, you continue to shock me and I’m sure other Christians who are reading this are just as shocked.  It is absolutely unbelievable that you have the nerve to speak about President Trump in this manner, when you have done the most abominable things during this past year!!

Harris, the son of Christian homeschooling pioneers Gregg and Sono Harris, served in the Covenant Life Church as a pastor from 2004 to 2015. In his lengthy July Instagram post, he walked back some of his devout views and apologized to communities that his past teachings might have harmed.

“To the LGBTQ+ community, I want to say that I am sorry for the views that I taught in my books and as a pastor regarding sexuality,” he wrote. “I regret standing against marriage equality, for not affirming you and your place in the church, and for any ways that my writing and speaking contributed to a culture of exclusion and bigotry. I hope you can forgive me.⁣⁣”

So, Joshua – you are apologizing to the gay community but you couldn’t care less about the church members who were devastated when you left them and told them you were no longer a Christian?

He also confirmed he divorced his wife, a move that was later criticized by evangelical activist Mike Farris in an op-ed for Christian Post. “You have walked away from your faith in Christ,” he wrote. “That’s even worse.” source

And to Mike Farris I say AMEN and AMEN.

Shalom b’Yeshua
MARANATHA!!

 

Washington Post & New York Times Global Warming Scare from 1922 and 1923!

Sent to me via Email from a fellow Rapture Ready writer:

“The Arctic Ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from the Consulate at Bergen, Norway.

Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard of temperatures in the Arctic zone.

Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes.

Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm.

Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared.

Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic,       while vast shoals of herring and smelts which have never before  ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds.

Within a few years it is predicted that due to the ice melt the sea will rise and make most coast cities uninhabitable.

I must apologize. I neglected to mention that this report was from November 2 1922, as reported by the AP and published in The Washington Post 96 years ago. This must have been caused by the Model T Ford’s emissions or possibly from horse and cattle farts.”  ~end of email.

 At first I thought it was complete nonsense, but curiosity got the best of me and I researched this.

Guess what?   I found this to be true – this was actually published by the AP in the Washington Post on November 2, 1922.

May I repeat that date?  NOVEMBER 2, 1922

From Newsmax.com

Decades of Climate Hysteria Unsupported by Data

Whether it’s about galloping glaciers leading us to the next Ice Age or hyperventilating polar bears drowning in rising tides of fossil-fueled despair, two facts are inescapable. As global temperatures blow hot and cold, chilling overreactions and overheated speculations occur either way.

There’s no reason to waste a perfectly good crisis, even if you have to invent one to make a strong argument for it. As Al Gore told Grist Magazine in May, 2006, “Nobody is interested in solutions if they don’t think there is a problem. Given that starting point, I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening an audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis.”

Perhaps an even better starting point before over-representing any climate crisis and spend many $ billions more to solve it will be to decide which of two opposite “factual presentations” deemed to be most dangerous should be exaggerated. Let’s begin this starting point about a century ago, when the sweaty saga was much like today.

According to a Nov. 2, 1922 Associated Press report published in The Washington Post, “The Arctic Ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer, and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot. Reports from fishermen, seal hunters, and explorers all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone.

“Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Within a few years it is predicted that due to the ice melt the sea will rise and make most coastal cities uninhabitable.” (emphasis added)

This warming apparently began before the Industrial Revolution. A March 27, 1933 headline in The New York Times proclaimed, “America in Longest Warm Spell since 1776; Temperature Tine Records a 25-Year Rise.” Five years later the Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society thought that this was a good thing. They noted that heating the planet with carbon dioxide “is likely to prove beneficial to mankind in several ways, besides the provision of heat and power.”

Those previously beneficial rising temperatures and atmospheric carbon dioxide levels during the 1930s were followed by about three decades of cooling which began in the 1940s. As CO2 levels continued to rise, that cooling, a new crisis, was attributed humans also.

Deforestation was allegedly increasing Earth’s surface reflectivity, causing sunlight to bounce back into space without heating the surface — and smokestack particulate emissions were blocking out light before it got here.

A 1970 Life Magazine article predicted that “by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching Earth by one-half.” The situation was dire. As Science Digest reported in 1973, “At this point we do not have the comfortable distance of tens of thousands of years to prepare for the next Ice Age, and that how carefully we monitor our atmospheric pollution will have direct bearing on the arrival and nature of the weather crisis.” Consequently, the scientists warned “Once the freeze starts, it will be too late.”

A 1974 Time Magazine article, asked (and answered) its big jackpot title question “Another Ice Age?” It concluded, “When meteorologists take an average of temperatures around the globe they find the atmosphere has been gradually colder for the past three decades . . . and the winter aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another Ice Age.”

More dramatically, the 1975 March cover of Science News depicted Manhattan being swallowed by an approaching glacier with a bold headline announcing “The Ice Age Cometh.” The article said that “the transition would include only a small change in global temperature — two or three degrees — but the impact on civilization would be catastrophic.” A National Academy of Sciences report that year confirmed a “finite possibility that a serious worldwide cooling could befall the Earth within the next 100 years.”

And all you “climate change deniers” out there who I keep hearing about but have yet to meet, please note that three-decade-long man-made cooling crisis flipped again about a decade later when a June 30, 1989 Associated Press article headlined “U.N. Official Predicts Disaster : Says Greenhouse Effect Could Wipe Some Nations Off Map.” The director of the U.N.’s Environment Programme’s New York office warned that “coastal flooding and crop failures” would “create an exodus of ‘eco-refuges,’ threatening political chaos” if global warming wasn’t reversed by the year 2000.

Just for the record, apart from major 1998 and 2024-16 ocean El Nino events, satellite instruments, the best measurements available, show no statistically significant mean global warming now for nearly two decades. Meanwhile, let’s remember that while climate really does change, yet also not forget that it’s something next year’s college sophomores will have never experienced during their lifetimes — much less anything we should get hot and bothered about.

Larry Bell is an endowed professor of space architecture at the University of Houston where he founded the Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA) and the graduate program in space architecture. He is the author of “Scared Witless: Prophets and Profits of Climate Doom”(2015) and “Climate of Corruption: Politics and Power Behind the Global Warming Hoax” (2012). Read more of his reports — Click Here Now.  source

From whatsupwiththat.com

The source report of the Washington Post article on changes in the arctic has been found in the Monthly Weather Review for November 1922. It is much more detailed than the Washington Post (Associated Press) article. It seems the AP heaviliy relied on the report from Norway Consulate George Ifft, which is shown below. See the original MWR article below and click the newsprint copy for a complete artice or see the link to the original PDF below:

changing-artic_monthly_wx_review_intro.png

Click the article to see the full article changing-arctic_monthly_wx_review.png.

The PDF of that page exists here from NOAA’s archives. Thanks to Michael Ronayne for locating it and many other resources you can find in the comments section below.

******I’m very sorry, but the Global Warming fanatics had the “NOAA archives” scrubbed from the Internet.

If Yogi Berra were here to comment on the hullabaloo over the changes in the arctic today, I’m pretty sure he’d say. “It’s Deja Vu all over again”. source

I actually broke down and subscribed to the NY Times in order to allow you to see the following:

NY Times article:  The Arctic is Getting Warmer dated February 25, 1923

And to you, Greta Thunberg we shout a collective HOW DARE YOU????

I thought I might bring out my “Climate Change Ruse” article for the reader once more:

Climate Change Used as a Ruse to Control World Economies    <click to read

Any questions?

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom b’Yeshua

MARANATHA!!

 

 

 

Model T Fords and Cattle Farts: What They Have in Common

Sent to me via Email from a fellow Rapture Ready writer:

“The Arctic Ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from the Consulate at Bergen, Norway.

Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard of temperatures in the Arctic zone.

Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes.

Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm.

Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared.

Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic,       while vast shoals of herring and smelts which have never before  ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds.

Within a few years it is predicted that due to the ice melt the sea will rise and make most coast cities uninhabitable.

I must apologize. I neglected to mention that this report was from November 2 1922, as reported by the AP and published in The Washington Post 96 years ago. This must have been caused by the Model    T Ford’s emissions or possibly from horse and cattle farts.”

 At first I thought it was complete nonsense, but curiosity got the best of me and I researched this.

Guess what?   I found this to be true – this was actually published by the AP in the Washington Post on November 2, 1922.

May I repeat that date?  NOVEMBER 2, 1922

From Newsmax.com

Decades of Climate Hysteria Unsupported by Data

Whether it’s about galloping glaciers leading us to the next Ice Age or hyperventilating polar bears drowning in rising tides of fossil-fueled despair, two facts are inescapable. As global temperatures blow hot and cold, chilling overreactions and overheated speculations occur either way.

There’s no reason to waste a perfectly good crisis, even if you have to invent one to make a strong argument for it. As Al Gore told Grist Magazine in May, 2006, “Nobody is interested in solutions if they don’t think there is a problem. Given that starting point, I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening an audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis.”

Perhaps an even better starting point before over-representing any climate crisis and spend many $ billions more to solve it will be to decide which of two opposite “factual presentations” deemed to be most dangerous should be exaggerated. Let’s begin this starting point about a century ago, when the sweaty saga was much like today.

According to a Nov. 2, 1922 Associated Press report published in The Washington Post, “The Arctic Ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer, and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot. Reports from fishermen, seal hunters, and explorers all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone.

“Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Within a few years it is predicted that due to the ice melt the sea will rise and make most coastal cities uninhabitable.” (emphasis added)

This warming apparently began before the Industrial Revolution. A March 27, 1933 headline in The New York Times proclaimed, “America in Longest Warm Spell since 1776; Temperature Tine Records a 25-Year Rise.” Five years later the Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society thought that this was a good thing. They noted that heating the planet with carbon dioxide “is likely to prove beneficial to mankind in several ways, besides the provision of heat and power.”

Those previously beneficial rising temperatures and atmospheric carbon dioxide levels during the 1930s were followed by about three decades of cooling which began in the 1940s. As CO2 levels continued to rise, that cooling, a new crisis, was attributed humans also.

Deforestation was allegedly increasing Earth’s surface reflectivity, causing sunlight to bounce back into space without heating the surface — and smokestack particulate emissions were blocking out light before it got here.

A 1970 Life Magazine article predicted that “by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching Earth by one-half.” The situation was dire. As Science Digest reported in 1973, “At this point we do not have the comfortable distance of tens of thousands of years to prepare for the next Ice Age, and that how carefully we monitor our atmospheric pollution will have direct bearing on the arrival and nature of the weather crisis.” Consequently, the scientists warned “Once the freeze starts, it will be too late.”

A 1974 Time Magazine article, asked (and answered) its big jackpot title question “Another Ice Age?” It concluded, “When meteorologists take an average of temperatures around the globe they find the atmosphere has been gradually colder for the past three decades . . . and the winter aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another Ice Age.”

More dramatically, the 1975 March cover of Science News depicted Manhattan being swallowed by an approaching glacier with a bold headline announcing “The Ice Age Cometh.” The article said that “the transition would include only a small change in global temperature — two or three degrees — but the impact on civilization would be catastrophic.” A National Academy of Sciences report that year confirmed a “finite possibility that a serious worldwide cooling could befall the Earth within the next 100 years.”

And all you “climate change deniers” out there who I keep hearing about but have yet to meet, please note that three-decade-long man-made cooling crisis flipped again about a decade later when a June 30, 1989 Associated Press article headlined “U.N. Official Predicts Disaster : Says Greenhouse Effect Could Wipe Some Nations Off Map.” The director of the U.N.’s Environment Programme’s New York office warned that “coastal flooding and crop failures” would “create an exodus of ‘eco-refuges,’ threatening political chaos” if global warming wasn’t reversed by the year 2000.

Just for the record, apart from major 1998 and 2024-16 ocean El Nino events, satellite instruments, the best measurements available, show no statistically significant mean global warming now for nearly two decades. Meanwhile, let’s remember that while climate really does change, yet also not forget that it’s something next year’s college sophomores will have never experienced during their lifetimes — much less anything we should get hot and bothered about.

Larry Bell is an endowed professor of space architecture at the University of Houston where he founded the Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA) and the graduate program in space architecture. He is the author of “Scared Witless: Prophets and Profits of Climate Doom”(2015) and “Climate of Corruption: Politics and Power Behind the Global Warming Hoax” (2012). Read more of his reports — Click Here Now.  source

From whatsupwiththat.com

The source report of the Washington Post article on changes in the arctic has been found in the Monthly Weather Review for November 1922. It is much more detailed than the Washington Post (Associated Press) article. It seems the AP heaviliy relied on the report from Norway Consulate George Ifft, which is shown below. See the original MWR article below and click the newsprint copy for a complete artice or see the link to the original PDF below:

changing-artic_monthly_wx_review_intro.png

Click the article to see the full article changing-arctic_monthly_wx_review.png.

The PDF of that page exists here from NOAA’s archives. Thanks to Michael Ronayne for locating it and many other resources you can find in the comments section below.

******I’m very sorry, but the Global Warming fanatics had the “NOAA archives” scrubbed from the Internet.

If Yogi Berra were here to comment on the hullabaloo over the changes in the arctic today, I’m pretty sure he’d say. “It’s Deja Vu all over again”. source

I actually broke down and subscribed to the NY Times in order to allow you to see the following:

NY Times article:  The Arctic is Getting Warmer dated February 25, 1923

And to you, Greta Thunberg we shout a collective HOW DARE YOU????

I thought I might bring out my “Climate Change Ruse” article for the reader once more:

Climate Change Used as a Ruse to Control World Economies    <click to read

Any questions?

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom b’Yeshua

MARANATHA!!