Trump Informs Abbas and Jordan’s Abdullah That Embassy Will be Moved to Jerusalem!


This is a MOST historic day!!!

Brethren, can you believe that we are alive to see Bible prophecy unfolding right before our eyes?   I’m SO excited!

But don’t for a minute think that Satan’s world of Jew haters are going to take this lying down.  Brace yourselves, my brothers and sisters. There WILL be rage. We may be on the doorstep of seeing Psalm 83 or even perhaps Ezekiel 38 come to pass.


Trump Tells Arab Leaders U.S. Will Move Embassy to Jerusalem

President Donald Trump told Arab leaders in phone calls on Tuesday that he intends to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, Arab officials said, a move that could upend the U.S. leader’s plans to launch an Israeli-Palestinian peace plan and risks sparking violence across the Middle East.

Mr. Trump is expected to delay the embassy move. But he will make a speech on Wednesday announcing the relocation and is also expected to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, U.S. officials said. State Department officials have warned embassies around the world to brace for potential protests.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and Jordan’s King Abdullah II received phone calls from Mr. Trump on Tuesday outlining his intention to move the embassy, according to statements from both their offices. The U.S. leader also informed Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Al Sisi, a spokesman for the Arab leader said.

Mr. Abbas’s office said he would “continue his contacts with…world leaders to prevent such unacceptable action.”

Israel has administered East Jerusalem since 1967, when it won control of that half of the city in the Six Day War. Nearly all Israeli government buildings are based in Jerusalem.

Palestinians consider East Jerusalem the capital of a future state. The international community doesn’t recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, conducting diplomacy from 87 embassies in Tel Aviv, about 45 miles away.

Mr. Trump is moving ahead with the announcement despite a barrage of diplomatic pressure from Arab, Palestinian and European leaders who have argued that decisions over the highly sensitive issue of the status of Jerusalem should be made in negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians.

Because of Jerusalem’s disputed status, Mr. Trump now risks derailing a Middle East peace effort that the White House had been working on and could damage strong ties his U.S. administration has nurtured with Arab states, foreign officials say.

Mr. Trump also phoned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday to discuss the matter with him, according to U.S. officials. A spokesman in Mr. Netanyahu’s office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. Israeli officials have said they would welcome the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem and acknowledgment of the city as Israel’s capital.

Under a U.S. law passed in 1995, the president must sign a waiver every six months postponing the embassy move or else trigger steep funding cuts for State Department facilities.

Since the law was passed in 1995, Democratic and Republican presidents have repeatedly opted not to move the embassy, citing national security concerns.

Diplomats and analysts expressed concern that moving the embassy could endanger prospects for a peace accord because of Jerusalem’s disputed status.

After promising to move the embassy on the campaign trail, Mr. Trump signed the waiver in June but this week hasn’t communicated whether he again signed the document, allowing the six-month deadline to pass.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan joined a chorus of opposition on Tuesday, warning that his government would sever ties with Israel if the U.S. went ahead with the potential embassy move.

Saudi Arabia also warned that the U.S. move would be “a significant breach of the principle of non-influence on the final solution negotiations.”

Jews declared an Israeli state on part of the land known before as British Mandate of Palestine in 1948, and Israel and Arabs from Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Jordan and Palestine then fought a war over the land. At the end of the fighting in 1949, the armistice carved Jerusalem into two halves, with Israelis in the west and Arabs in the east. – source

Hallelujah Lord God!  Your Word is Truth and You have told Your children in advance what will happen!!





Gay Wedding Cake Goes To Supreme Court: Why Are Muslim Bakers Exempt From Law Suits? (Video)

In light of the news about the gay couple taking their case to the Supreme Court over being denied a wedding cake from a Christian owned bakery, I thought it was a perfect time to bring out a video which proves that this is not about wedding cakes or even same sex couples.  It’s about HATRED of Christianity.

Two years ago, Christian satirist, Steven Crowder, and another undercover wedding cake shopper went into a MUSLIM bakery asking for a same sex wedding cake.  The answer from the Muslim owner was “No – you have to go somewhere else.”

Is it just me or are others wondering why Muslim owned bakeries are not under attack for discrimination against gays?  Maybe gays would not even consider going into a Muslim bakery for a wedding cake.  Why, you ask?  Perhaps they would be afraid of the repercusions  of even asking. After all, Christians are not known for blowing up, stabbing or mowing down people in the street.

Gays also should know that the “Religion of Peace” is well known for throwing gays off of tall buildings. After all, Muslims believe that death is the just punishment for being gay.


Gay wedding cake controversy heads to Supreme Court

The encounter between a same-sex couple and a Colorado baker lasted just a few seconds — but the legal, political and social impact could extend for decades after the Supreme Court takes up their case on Tuesday.

The justices will hear oral arguments in perhaps the most closely watched appeal so far this term, pitting religious conviction against anti-discrimination laws.

At issue is the July 2012 encounter, when Charlie Craig and David Mullins of Denver visited Masterpiece Cakeshop to buy a custom-made wedding cake. Owner Jack Phillips refused his services when told it was for a same-sex couple. A state civil rights commission sanctioned Phillips after a formal complaint from the gay couple.

But the Trump administration backs Phillips, who is represented in court by the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian nonprofit. He has lost at every step in the legal appeals process.

“I serve everybody that comes in: gay, straight, Catholic, Muslim, atheist. I welcome everybody into my shop,” Phillips told Fox News recently. “I just don’t create cakes for every event that’s presented to me.”

Phillips says he has lost business and had to let employees go because of the controversy.

Baker Jack Phillips is at the center of Tuesday’s Supreme Court hearing.  (Alliance Defending Freedom)

The court on Tuesday will examine whether applying Colorado’s public accommodations law to compel the local baker to create commercial “expression” violates his constitutionally protected Christian beliefs about marriage.

By wading again into the culture wars, the justices will have to confront recent decisions on both gay rights and religious liberty: a 2015 landmark opinion legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide and a separate 2014 decision affirming the right of some companies to act on their owner’s faith by refusing to provide contraception to its workers.

‘My bakery, my family, my life, the work I get to do, is a gift from God and I want to honor Him in everything I do.’

Chief Justice John Roberts predicted the current legal dilemma in his gay marriage dissent: “Hard questions arise when people of faith exercise religion in ways that may be seen to conflict with the new right to same-sex marriage.”


Craig and Mullins met on a blind date in late 2010, and decided to get married a couple of years later. Since Colorado did not permit it at the time, they tied the knot in Massachusetts. While planning for a hometown reception with friends and family, the two decided to visit Phillips’ small shop in a Denver suburb.

Along with Craig’s mother and a book of ideas, they met with Phillips for just 20 seconds by the owner’s account, when he said he told them, “Guys, I don’t make cakes for same-sex weddings.”

“What followed was a horrible pregnant pause during which what was happening really sunk in and we were mortified and embarrassed,” recalled Mullins. “We teared up. It was a very painful and emotional moment for us.”

“It made us feel helpless,” added Craig. “To this day I feel like Dave and I are sort of on guard when we go into public accommodations, whether we can talk about our relationship openly for the fear of being discriminated against again.”

In this Nov. 28, 2017, photo, Charlie Craig and David Mullins are shown in their home in Denver.  (AP)

Phillips was behind the counter at his shop when Fox News visited him last week. Using a palette of colored icing, he sculpted sugary designs that included red birds and the Denver Broncos football logo.

“It’s not about turning away these customers, it’s about doing a cake for an event — a religious sacred event — that conflicts with my conscience,” he said earlier. “My bakery, my family, my life, the work I get to do, is a gift from God and I want to honor Him in everything I do.”

The soft-spoken Phillips adds that like other artists, he has turned away cake requests for a variety of reasons: baked goods with profanity or obscene images, racial stereotypes, even those that he says would disparage homosexuals.


The Trump administration agrees with Phillips’ legal claims to a large extent. Attorney General Jeff Sessions in October issued broad guidance to executive branch agencies, reiterating the government should respect religious freedom, which in the Justice Department’s eyes extends to people, businesses and organizations.

“Faith is deeply embedded into the history of our country,” President Trump said in May, adding his administration “will not allow people of faith to be targeted, bullied or silenced anymore.”

But civil rights groups worry the conservative majority on the court may be ready to peel back protections for groups with a history of enduring discrimination.

“A ruling in this case to give businesses the right to refuse service to customers would shatter longstanding non-discrimination laws and have wide impacts on religious and racial minorities, single mothers, people with disabilities, and others,” James Esseks, director of the ACLU’s LGBT and HIV Project, said.

The case raises tough moral and legal questions that courts are increasingly being asked to navigate:

  • When certain businesses open their doors, do they in essence get to choose their customer base, by creating exceptions for whom they will serve?
  • Do artists and others who provide subjective, personalized content have any discretion to refuse or tailor their creations — based on religious or moral beliefs?
  • Couldn’t Mullins and Craig have found another bakery to accommodate them, a practical solution in the eyes of many that would avoid further conflict between customer and owner?
  • Does the LGBT community deserve a higher level of protection from civil rights discrimination — in the same class as race, sex, and disability — when it comes to states passing and enforcing statutes involving sexual orientation?


Sitting in their comfortable home, the couple at the center of the case said they are anxious to put their half-decade legal odyssey behind them.

“Five years is a long time to continue talk about a situation that has happened,” Mullins said. “But it has forced us to really come together as couple and support each other. I think we have been stronger for it.”

Mullins, an office manager and part-time musician and photographer, and Craig, who is an interior designer, express hope their case sends a clear social message.

“We were doing this initially for ourselves. But, along the way we have heard thousands of people that have been discriminated against,” Craig said. “So, now I feel like we are also standing for them too.”

The case is Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (16-111).

A ruling is expected by June 2018. source

As I said in the beginning of this article – this is NOT about gays being discriminated against.  It’s just another way to bring Christians closer to the day when we will be incarcerated.

The Left are enjoying the show. They consider us domestic terrorists. When was the last time that you read about Christians pushing gays to their death from the roof of a building?