The Leftwing Media Continue Their Talk of Murder When It Comes To President Trump

During the Obama reign, when news casters from Fox News would speak about the outrageous actions of BHO, they would do it with dignity; not resorting to name calling or talk of murder.  But if Leftist news casters abided by this “professionalism” they would quickly be out of business. I have an idea…..why don’t they just report on the “news?”  Oh wait: that is not their purpose. They are simply outlets for propaganda for the Left.

They are no better than Pravda in Russia!

With President Trump tweeting to the America people on a daily basis, the Left are resorting to accusations of insanity, brutality and now they claim  that Trump is a sociopath.  Perhaps Chris Matthews and his ilk should take a long look in the mirror. But even then I believe that their blindness would not allow them to see themselves as they truly are.

One would think that after 6 months, the Left would be resigned to the fact that their “darling” Hillary Clinton lost the last election – fair and square.  Oh,  and the Russians were not involved in getting Trump elected.  The people spoke loudly, and clearly we did not vote for another 4 years of Obama!


Matthews Suggests Trump Channel Mussolini, Murder Kushner; Compares Him to Ethiopian Dictator

Go ahead and criticize President Trump’s Mika tweet, but there’s no denying this was disturbing. On Thursday’sHardball, MSNBC pundit Chris Matthews compared the President to not only communist Ethiopian dictator Mengistu Haile Mariam and a modern-day Romanov but also channel Benito Mussolini having son-in-law Jared Kushner murdered.

 As he’s previously done(documented here, here, and here), Matthews reiterated his belief that Kushner and wife Ivanka Trump are akin to the murderous sons of Saddam Hussein, Uday and Qusay.

Let’s first start with Matthews invoking Mengistu. During a tease about reported disarray in the Trump administration with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson being stonewalled from doing his job, Matthews gloated about the “meltdown.”

“It’s a far cry from that love feast we watched a few weeks ago, which is right out of Mengistu’s government in Ethiopia with all the people bowing to the president. Apparently all is not well in paradise,” Matthews quipped.

Later, Matthews told The Washington Post’s Ashley Parker that he’s “allowed to have opinions” (unlike print reporters, supposedly) “and one of my opinions was that nepotism is a bad thing in government” as evidenced by the supposed American incarnations of the Husseins:

You put Uday and Qusay in your government and you’re going to have a problem with everybody else in the government because nobody can fight with them. Nobody can challenge them and, in the end, the son-in-law is always right because he can always to go his father-in-law or his wife and say they were mean to me.

Instead of Tillerson overseeing foreign policy, Matthews observed how “[t]he power seems to have gone to the son-in-law” and thus the Trump’s are “the Romanovs.” He then nudged Parker to agree (which she didn’t): “Is it a royal family instead of a Democratic or a Republican form of government? Or is it a family running the government? Is it Ivanka and Jared and the President sitting around in the White House upstairs ruling the world?”

Once Parker finished her thoughts on how the Trump’s perceive what they’re doing as simply running government like a business, Matthews told New York Times columnist Frank Bruni that it might behoove Trump to take a page out of Mussolini’s playbook, which was murder your son-in-law.

“So the son-in-law — you know, one good thing Mussolini did was execute his son-in-law. I mean, I’m talking about Ciano,” he clownishly argued.

Bruni awkwardly stepped in to play the role that Keith Olbermann did when Matthews had a thrill up his leg, telling him that he should “be careful here.”

“That was an extreme measure. But this was — this is a strange situation,” Matthews concluded before giving way to Bruni.

Matthews’s joke about Trump murdering his son-in-law was brought to you by Cascade, Johnson’s baby lotion, and Lincoln Financial. – source

Chris Matthews’ “Thrill going up his leg” at the election of Obama is now replaced by slanderous and downright murderous comments about our president.  WHY is nothing being done about people who say such things?  These Left wing liberal broadcasters are viewed by millions of Left wing loonies.  You don’t think that some of them are taking these words to heart?  I do, and it’s quite unnerving.

Pray for the Lord to protect  President Trump and his entire administration. God forbid it, but if anything happens to our president or anyone in his administration, the blood will be on the hands of the Leftwing media.

Pray for the peace of Jerusalem!

Shalom b’Yeshua







10 Month Old Baby Sentenced To Die: This Is Socialized Medicine

Globalists love Socialized medicine. Why?  Because they can make decisions about who lives and who dies – that’s great for population control;  not so great for a 10 month old child who has been sentenced to die.


Matt Walsh: Courts in Europe have sentenced a baby to death. This is socialized medicine.

There’s a horrific case over in the U.K. that hasn’t gotten a ton of attention here, but it should. If we look closely, we may see our future — and our present.

Charlie Gard is a 10-month-old baby who suffers from a rare genetic disorder called mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome. It’s a horrendous condition that leads to organ malfunction, brain damage, and other symptoms. The hospital that had been treating the boy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children in London, made the determination that nothing more can be done for him and he must be taken off of life support. He should “die with dignity,” they said. The parents, Chris Gard and Connie Yates, disagreed.

This is the very crucial thing to understand: they are not insisting that GOSH be forced to keep Charlie on life support. Rather, they want to take him out of the hospital and to America to undergo a form of experimental therapy that a doctor here had already agreed to administer. Chris and Connie raised over $1.6 million to fund this last ditch effort to save their child’s life. All they needed the British hospital to do was release their child into their care, which doesn’t seem like a terribly burdensome request. They would then leave the country and try their luck with treatment here. However slim the chance of success may have been, it was better than just sitting by and watching their baby die.

Here’s where things get truly insane and barbaric. The hospital refused to give Charlie back to his parents. The matter ended up in the courts, and, finally, in the last several hours, the European Court of “Human Rights” ruled that the parents should be barred from taking their son to the United States for treatment. According to the “human rights” court, it is Charlie’s human right that he expire in his hospital bed in London. The parents are not allowed to try and save his life. It is “in his best interest” to simply die, they ruled.

In Europe, “Death with dignity” supersedes all other rights.

In Europe, a mother may kill her baby but she is not allowed to keep him alive.

Again: barbaric.

I have heard many people rationalize this demented decision by saying “the doctors know best.” That may well be relevant and true in situations where family members are trying to force doctors to administer treatments that they, the medical professionals, know will not work. But that is not what’s happening here. The only thing these parents are trying to “force” the doctors to do is relax their grip so the child can be taken to different doctors in a different country. The doctors may be the final authority on what kinds of medical measures they personally should take, but they are not the final authority over life itself. It is one thing for them to say, “I will not do this treatment.” It’s quite another for them to say, “You are not allowed to have this treatment done by anyone. You must die.” The former is reasonable. The latter is euthanasia. This baby is being euthanized. By barbarians.

I’ve seen some on social media calling this case “unimaginable” and “mind boggling.” It is certainly awful, but unfortunately it does not boggle my mind or exceed the limits of my imagination. These sorts of cases are inevitable in Europe, and, unless we make a drastic change of course, they will soon become commonplace here. The stage is already set. Just consider these three factors:

(1) This is what happens with socialized medicine. 

If the State runs the health care system, ultimately they will be the ones who decide whose life is worth saving and whose isn’t. That’s not just a byproduct of socialized medicine — it’s the point. And it is especially risky to cede this sort of power to the government when you live in a culture that doesn’t fundamentally value parental rights or human life, which brings us to the last two points.

(2) This is what happens when parental rights are subordinate to the State. 

This case came down to the question of who should have the final say over a child. Should it be the parents, or should it be a collection of doctors, judges, and bureaucrats? And if the parents don’t take precedence in a life or death situation, can it really be said that they have rights at all? If I have no say when my child’s very life is at stake, when do I have a say?

The way things are headed in Europe, a parent may have some jurisdiction over the minor minutia of daily life, but when it comes to the major issues — how a child is to be educated, how he is to live, what he is to believe, when he is to die — it is increasingly up to the State to determine. As a “medical ethics” expert at Oxford put it, parental rights are “at the heart” of most big medical decisions, however “there are limits.” Chris and Connie apparently reached the “limits” of their parental authority and now must sit back obediently while their son dies in agony. “Limits,” you see. You’re only a parent up to a certain point, and then your relationship to your child doesn’t count for anything anymore. That’s how things are in the U.K. — and the U.S., as always, is close behind.

(3) This is what happens when human life is not considered sacred. 

But what really is the downside of taking the child to the U.S. for treatment? It may not work, OK, but why not try? They raised enough money to pay for everything, including an air ambulance to get the baby to the treatment facility. Nobody is being burdened here. Nobody is being forced to do something they don’t want to do. What is there to lose?

Well, the court answers, it’s just not worth the trouble. They’ve weighed all the variables using their various formulations, and they’ve decided that it makes no sense to go through all this trouble on the slim hope of saving this one measly life. Yes, they’ve used the excuse that the baby is “suffering,” and I’m sure he is suffering, but that doesn’t explain why the parents should be prevented from pursuing every option to ease that suffering. Death is not a treatment plan for suffering. Death is death. Death is the destruction of life. We all must experience it some day, but the inevitability of death does not negate the value and dignity of life.

What this really comes down to is that the Powers That Be don’t see the fundamental value in life. That’s why you’ll hear these people speak more often of the “dignity” of death than the dignity of life. They preach about the “right” to die but not the right to live. And the laws in Europe reflect this emphasis on death instead of life. Over there, they kill children in the womb and euthanize them when they come out. They even euthanize alcoholics and depressives and other people who are by no means terminally ill. Once the right to die has been placed over the right to life, death will continue claiming new ground and eating into life more and more. Death is a destructive force. What else can it do but consume?

It’s not quite as bad here yet, but we’re getting there. We already kill hundreds of thousands of children in the womb, and we often speak with admiration of people who make the “brave” decision to commit suicide. And we already, in many instances, place the authority of the State over the rights of parents. Our education system is built around that philosophy.

So, as I said, the stage is set. Prepare yourself for what’s to come.

And pray for Chris and Connie tonight.- source 

Twenty years ago, if you read this story, you would be sure that it was fictional; kind of like the book “1984.”  Unfortunately, this is very real. No life is sacred to most people.  Animals are considered more “sacred” than humans.  Ask any Leftist liberal – they’ll tell you.

 I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvellous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well.  (Psalm 139:14).

Charlie Gard was fearfully and wonderfully made!  And he has parents who adore him and want to do anything to save him.

What a wicked place is this world.  Come Lord Jesus!






From Russia With LIES: The Saga Of CNN Continues

How long did CNN think they could continue their false narratives, and not be found out?  

Whining like babies over President Trump’s tweets, I’m sick to death of their immoral tactics!  Freedom of the press does not mean freedom to mislead the masses.

To fully appreciate and understand why these people continue on this path, one must know that these “journalists”  (I use that term lightly) are morally bankrupt and void of any standards or professionalism in their work.


O’Keefe Strikes Again: Second Video Exposes CNN on Russia

James O’Keefe and Project Veritas are quickly becoming the most hated operation in America among the halls of the left media this week.

After a sting video earlier this week revealed a CNN producer admitting the Russia story is total BS, the network was caught on their heels.

The only defense they could muster was that the producer wasn’t responsible for news content.

And that’s when Veritas dropped the second bomb yesterday with a sting video of famed lefty, former Obama czar and CNN contributor Van Jones admitting Russia is a ‘nothing-burger’.

CNN is officially now in a tailspin with no credible answer for their attempt to take down Trump.

Here’s more from Redstate…

After the initial shock that left CNN with that stunned-mullet look, there was some pushback:

According to Brian Stelter on Twitter, CNN released a statement stating that Bonifield is just a “Health Producer” and “isn’t involved in Russia or Trump coverage.”

Paul Fahri of the Washington Post also weighed in on the Veritas video and Bonifield’s position at CNN:

“[I]t never mentions that Bonifield is a producer of health and medical stories, raising questions about how relevant his views are, and how informed he is, about CNN’s political coverage.”

O’Keefe had anticipated that line of attack and today the other shoe dropped:

The featured talent is former Obama White House commie-in-residence, Van Jones. Van Jones is a “CNN contributor,” not a mere producer for health programming. He regularly holds forth on Trump’s “Russia problem.” The action starts at 1:26 when Van Jones is approached by someone who claims he has previously been introduced to him. A conversation starts. This is the key part:

VERITAS: What do you think is going to happen this week with the whole Russia thing?

JONES: The Russia thing is just a big nothingburger.Indeed. A big destructive nothingburger that has accomplished Vladimir Putin’s goal of undercutting public confidence in the US electoral system. And yet, knowing it is a “nothingburger,” Van Jones is happy to go on CNN and talk about it and CNN, with the same knowledge, is happy to host the discussion.

So, Van Jones is happy to continue the lies. Hmmmmm…..why should the Left change their style? It’s worked for them – until now.

“Lying lips are abomination to the Lord: but they that deal truly are his delight” (Proverbs 12:22).

My mother always told us “Your lies will find you out.”

I guess the Left were never taught this.

But they sure are being school on it at the present time!

Shalom b’Yeshua


As We Wait For Our Bridegroom – Let Us Not Neglect the Study Of His Word

Those of us who have discernment and can clearly see that the end of this age is rapidly approaching, know these things by the reading of God’s Word. All one needs to do is to read news reports regarding the Middle East and search the Scriptures. God’s Word jumps off the page for those of us who are truly watching and waiting.

But brethren, as we wait for our Blessed Redeemer, we must continue to be edified and strengthened by the reading of His Word. We also will be admonished to share Salvation with others who are lost and cannot find their way.


I use gotquestions a lot in my articles. I have found them to be sound and grounded in Scripture.  I will be outlining their answer to the following question:

Question: “Why should we read the Bible / study the Bible?”

  • We should read and study the Bible because it is God’s Word to us. The Bible is literally “God-breathed” (2 Timothy 3:16). In other words, it is God’s very words to us.
  • We should read and study the Bible because it is totally reliable and without error. The Bible is unique among so-called “holy” books in that it does not merely give moral teaching and say, “Trust me.” Rather, we have the ability to test it by checking the hundreds of detailed prophecies that it makes, by checking the historical accounts it records, and by checking the scientific facts it relates.
  • We should read and study the Bible because God does not change and because mankind’s nature does not change; it is as relevant for us as it was when it was written.
  • We should read and study the Bible because there is so much false teaching. The Bible gives us the measuring stick by which we can distinguish truth from error.
  • The Bible equips us to serve God (2 Timothy 3:17; Ephesians 6:17; Hebrews 4:12). It helps us know how to be saved from our sin and its ultimate consequence (2 Timothy 3:15).
  • Reading and studying the Bible helps us see beyond the attractive “bait” to the painful “hook” in sinful temptations, so that we can learn from others’ mistakes rather than making them ourselves.
  • The Bible is a book that is not merely for reading. It is a book for studying so that it can be applied. Otherwise, it is like swallowing food without chewing and then spitting it back out again—no nutritional value is gained by it.

Read entire Gotquestions article here

I will add another reason we need to be in the Word of God as we wait for our Blessed Hope:

God cares so much for us, that He left us His Word – a Letter of Love to us. He knows that in these bodies we will have so many trials and troubles. He knows that we will be tempted to sin, and sometimes we will stumble and fall.

 “For he knoweth our frame; he remembereth that we are dust”  (Psalm 103:14).

He cares and loves us so much, that He made a way to be reconciled to Himself. He cannot be in the presence of sin.  He sent His only Son, Jesus, to make a way for us to be reconciled to Him.  When God looks at those who are saved, He sees Jesus.

In reading His Word, we can see from Genesis to Revelation,  His plan of redemption for mankind. We are edified when we read and study God’s Word.  He equips us to share His Amazing Agape Love with others, so that their eyes may be opened to His Truth and be saved.

So as we wait for Jesus, let us be nourished and edified by reading and studying His Word.

Shalom b’Yeshua