OPEN LETTER TO ‘JANE’S REVENGE’ Your Violent Extremist Group Should Find Another Name Because ‘JANE ROE’ Became A PRO-LIFE ADVOCATE For the UNBORN!


Jane’s Revenge Plans Roe v. Wade Reveal ‘Night of Rage,’ ‘Carrying that Anger Out into the World Expressing it Physically’


The radical pro-abortion group, Jane’s Revenge, is planning more acts of domestic terrorism when the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on Roe v. Wade is revealed, dubbed a “Night of Rage: An Autonomous Call to Action Against Patriarchal Supremacy.”

The group posted its plans on the Anarchists Library website at the end of May in expectation of the ruling, expected sometime in June.

Here are some excerpts from the manifesto:

This is an event that should inspire rage in millions of people who can get pregnant…and yet, the response thus far has been tepid.

We have agonized over this apparent absence of indignation. Why is it that we are so afraid to unleash hell upon those who are destroying us? Fear of state repression is valid, but this goes deeper than that.

Whatever form your fury takes, the first step is feeling it.

The next step is carrying that anger out into the world and expressing it physically.

Consider this your call to action.

On the night the final ruling is issued——a specific date we cannot yet predict, but we know is arriving imminently——we are asking for courageous hearts to come out after dark.

Whoever you are and wherever you are, we are asking for you to do what you can to make your anger known.

We have selected a time of 8 pm for actions nationwide to begin, but know that this is a general guideline. There may be other considerations involved in planning time and place. We do not claim to speak for every community or crew. We are simply calling out to you. And we hope you answer our cries.

The manifesto says that if there are any “cis males allies” who want to take part, okay, “but Do not police us. Do not tell us what is and isn’t appropriate.”

The manifesto concludes, “To those who work to oppress us: If abortion isn’t safe, you aren’t either. We are everywhere.”

More than 100 Republicans have signed a letter asking Attorney General Merrick Garland to instruct the Department of Justice to investigate this group in relation to attacks on pro-life pregnancy centers across the country as domestic terrorists. Source

As Paul Harvey would say: “Now here’s the rest of the story” and so will the readers of this article know the true story about “Jane Roe” whose real name was Norma McCorvey. from 2003

JUNE 18, 2003

“Jane Roe” Requests Roe Case Be Overturned

Washington, DC —Norma McCorvey, the former “Roe” of Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court case that legalized abortion, is filing an historic motion today to re-open her case and request that it be overturned. The filing is based on changes in law and factual conditions since the high court handed down its decision 30 years ago.

As a party to the original litigation, Norma McCorvey has the right to petition the court to re-open the original case based on changes in factual conditions or changes in law that make the prior decision “no longer just,” said Allan E. Parker, Jr., lead attorney for the Texas-based Justice Foundation.

The motion was filed at a news conference Tuesday. The motion asks for a reversal of the judgment that was first entered 33 years ago yesterday by the Dallas Federal Court. McCorvey is asking that the judgment in the original Roecase be set aside.

“I long for the day that justice will be done and the burden from all of these deaths will be removed from my shoulders,” McCorvey said. “I want to do everything in my power to help women and their children. The issue is justice for women, justice for the unborn, and justice for what is right.”

The U.S. Supreme Court has overturned its own precedents using Rule 60(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Rule 60), most recently in the 1997 decision of Agostini v. Felton. In that case, the high court used a post-judgment motion by a party to overturn two of its own 12-year-old precedents.

Norma McCorvey was joined at the press conference by her lead attorney, Mr. Parker, by co-counsel Harold Cassidy of New Jersey, and by post-abortive women, who will provide testimony about how abortion has harmed them. These women, many of whom are witnesses in the Rule 60 Motion, want others to know how abortion has negatively impacted women’s lives, including their physical and emotional health.

Read rest of article HERE


Overturning Roe v. Wade Will Be a Victory for ‘Roe’ and ‘Doe’ Alike

Read article HERE from 2020

Jane Roe of Roe v. Wade Never Had An Abortion, She Gave Birth to a Daughter

There is a woman, born in Texas decades ago, who could still be alive right now. In fact, she should have never been born. In 1973, the Supreme Court decided that the Texas law that prevented Jane Roe from ending the life of her unborn daughter was unconstitutional. But by the time the Supreme Court issued its decision in 1973, she had already been born and adopted by a family—likely not knowing that all that ink spilled in Roe v. Wade was about her.

Norma McCorvey was “Jane Roe.”

She claimed then that her pregnancy was the result of a rape, although she became outspokenly pro-life and publicly admitted that this, and virtually every fact on which her case was built, was a lie. Both McCorvey and Sandra Cano, the Doe of Doe v. Bolton—Roe’s companion case from Georgia decided the same day—became outspoken pro-life advocates who swore that their cases were built on lies.

Read rest of article HERE

Norma McCorvey died in 2017. I think that she was a very brave woman to plead with the SCOTUS to overturn the Roe V Wade decision of 1973.

She was so aware that the women who had abortions suffered emotionally. Many of them committed suicide or lived their life on drugs.

Here is an article which I have posted numerous times about how abortion personally affected me: Silent No More

How Can I Be Saved?