GUESS WHO’S COMING TO DINNER? The Middle East’s ‘Kumbaya’ Moment Won’t Last

The photo of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan reminded me of Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia years ago.

As I looked at the expression on Erdogan’s face, I could not help but wonder if he was thinking:

I hope he is not planning a Sword Dance!

And perhaps Crown Prince MBS was thinking:

You’re a dead man!

Onto the FP Article….


In a photo supplied by the Saudi Royal Court, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman meets Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan upon his arrival in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, on April 28.  BANDAR ALGALOUD/COURTESY OF SAUDI ROYAL COURT VIA REUTERS

Last week, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan visited Saudi Arabia, where he met with King Salman and Crown Prince Mohamed bin Salman. In late April, Iranian media confirmed that senior security officials from Saudi Arabia and Iran had met for a fifth round of normalization talks held under the auspices of the Iraqi and Omani governments. In March, Israel’s president, Isaac Herzog, visited Turkey—the first visit of a senior Israeli official to that country in 14 years. The same month, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad dropped in on Dubai’s Expo 2020 and met with Emirati leaders. Erdogan paid a visit to the United Arab Emirates in February after Abu Dhabi’s crown prince traveled to Turkey last November. And over the winter, the Emiratis and Iranians exchanged trade and investment delegations.

All this diplomatic activity has certain corners of Washington buzzing about regional “de-escalation” and “realignment.” It is a data point for advocates of U.S. retrenchment from the Middle East, the logic being that if regional actors are behaving responsibly and settling their differences, then the United States can draw down and only return in the event of a crisis.

That sounds great, but I don’t buy it. Not the arguments in favor of retrenchment and offshore balancing; those make sense (though mostly only in journal articles—when the United States tried this in the 1970s, it didn’t work, resulting in a long-term U.S. commitment to Gulf security). What I don’t buy is that this recent flurry of diplomacy heralds some new era of peace, love, and understanding in the Middle East. Rather, the various resets and outreach underway in the region are merely another means by which its leaders can pursue the same competition and conflicts of the past decade.

Even for someone as deeply cynical as myself, it is good news that regional powers are talking to each other. The conventional wisdom is that money is driving a new regional atmosphere that puts a premium on investments and economic cooperation instead of proxy wars and troll armies.

Since Ankara is pushing much of the regional reset, that makes a lot of sense. Erdogan’s economic mismanagement has contributed to a yearslong lira crisis, and with inflation running at about 70 percent, the Turkish leader has vowed to grow the economy out of the calamity of his own making. Thus, he has dropped the bellicose rhetoric about the Emiratis being—among other nasty things—piratesignorant, and incompetent. Erdogan also transferred the trial (in absentia) of the individuals charged in the murder of Jamal Khashoggi to Saudi Arabia, ending any possibility that they will be held accountable. This is the geopolitical version of going hat in hand hoping for some investment from enormous Gulf sovereign wealth funds, trade deals, currency swaps, and perhaps drone sales.

In fairness, the Turkish government’s rapprochement with Israel is less about money—or even about Israel—than many might believe. Officials in Ankara reason that if they come to terms with the Israeli government, it will relieve pressure on them in Washington. There is something to this, of course. After all, a trilateral logic underpins Egypt’s relations with the United States in which Israel plays a role. The Turks seem to believe that pro-Israel and Jewish organizations in the United States will advocate on their behalf if Erdogan welcomes his Israeli counterpart and the two exchange phone calls.

Setting aside the crude view concerning the influence of these groups, there is little evidence advocacy groups representing American Jews or Israel’s supporters want to help Erdogan, whether to get Turkey out from under U.S. sanctions over Ankara’s purchase of the Russian-made S-400 missile defense system or to make the U.S. Justice Department’s investigation into alleged sanctions-busting and other chicanery by the Turkish government-controlled Halkbank go away.

When it comes to de-escalation with Iran, the Emiratis have reportedly expressed interest in investment opportunities there, in particular a renewable energy project. The Saudis and Iranians have not come that far. The best one can say about those meetings is that they continue to happen.

Still, even with all the smiles and talk of cooperation, it is hard not to believe something else is going on. After a decade of calling each other terrorists, accusing each other of being sources of regional instability, and arming each other’s opponents, the current declarations of a new era in brotherly relations are too neat and pat.

Having proved unable to impose their wills on their antagonists by force, regional leaders are now trying a different tack. The Emiratis, for example, have hardly fallen in love with Erdogan, and the smug grin on the Saudi crown prince’s face in one of the photographs 

taken during the Turkish president’s recent visit suggests that the Saudis, like the Emiratis, are well aware of Erdogan’s desperation over a failing economy and soft poll numbers.

Read rest of article HERE



5 thoughts on “GUESS WHO’S COMING TO DINNER? The Middle East’s ‘Kumbaya’ Moment Won’t Last

  1. Hi, Geri — Thought you might be interested in this article by Paul Dohse of the TANC (Truth About New Calvinism) website:
    He used to be protestant/reformed, but for the past decade or two, he has been exposing corruption & false doctrine — a similar ministry to yours! This post in particular outlines how protestantism has largely abandoned Israel. After reading some of your recent posts (& re-posts) about Israel, Luther, Hitler, etc, I thought you’d like to read another likeminded soul’s insights. [He has many posts, and you can subscribe to the TANC email updates if you’d like to read more]. Blessings!

  2. saintsnotaints

    Ponder one item written on georgia guidestones that gets scant attention; we are not talking about the peoples but the elites that rule over them.
    There will be 7 official languages of the nwo great reset world. English, spanish, russian, chinese, hindi, hebrew & arabic. Thus, people speaking these 7 languages are planned to be alive in reduced numbers.
    Omission also means french, germans, japanese etc may not have many survivors left.
    Just another look at their playbook. Its explains trumps abraham accords, not for peace but merging arab and israeli elites for nwo nightmare dictatorship.

  3. …and more from TANC speaker/author John Immel — I realized that they have an entire 6-part series entitled: “From the Reformation to the Third Reich: Protestantism’s Impact on Western Culture”. Immel is part of Paul Dohse’s team, an excellent researcher & presenter. Here is the link for Part 6 (and the links to the other parts are also on this page at the top):

Comments are closed.