Month: February 2019

The Blatant Hypocrisy of Liberals – Read About Female Genital Mutilation in Muslim Countries

On By Geri UngureanIn Female Genital Mutilation4 Comments

An Iranian woman, symbolically dressed up as a victim of death by stoning, takes part in a protest of the National Council of Resistance of Iran outside a European Union foreign ministers meeting in Brussels November 7, 2005. About 4,000 supporters of the Iranian opposition were protesting as the European Union is studying a call by Iran to resume negotiations over the country's nuclear programme. REUTERS/Thierry Roge

Back in the 1960’s, Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan, amongst others, called for the burning of bras and the liberating of women everywhere. They wrote books and editorials on the subject of women being second class citizens. Women didn’t need men, according to these uber liberal and oft times crazy women. They sounded like men haters to me.

Liberals Love Jihadists

Strong statement? I think not. Just one look at “The View” (if you can stand it) will show you that these liberal minded women will stand up for Muslims to their last breath.

Look at the “Women’s March” which has been spear-headed year after year by Linda Sarsour, who is a radical Muslim. She is fooling her sheeple.  It is truly herd mentality and it’s scary to watch!

Do these people know how women are treated in fundamentalist Islamic countries?  They will belittle Christians and with the next breath get on their soapbox about Islam, and how unfair we are to these people. After all, the jihadists are only trying to kill us.  What’s the problem with that?  Oh, wait……the liberals blame us for these people beheading thousands.  Is this absolutely crazy or what?

Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) in Fundamentalist Muslim Countries:

Female Genital Mutilation  (Warning – Graphic)

Stoning of Woman in Sharia Law in Iran (GRAPHIC)

What is the Liberal’s Excuse?

I have watched interviews of liberals about the inhumane treatment of women in sharia countries.  They invariably change the subject or insinuated that this is their “culture.”

Liberals are Hypocrites in the purest sense of the word:

James 1:8 says this:

“A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.” 

As always, the Bible speaks truth.

Abortion

These same liberal women who fight for the right to kill unborn babies in their mother’s wombs, right up to the day of delivery, will turn a blind eye to the slaughter and mutilation of women in the Middle East; and their treatment as if they are cattle and not human beings.

And now the laws concerning Abortion in NY and soon to be in Virginia, Vermont and New Mexico are actually INFANTICIDE, and they make no excuses.  They are proud of these laws.  SICK.

Satan has deceived so many and he continues to deceive.  Speak truth to even the most liberal person you may know. God is bigger than the evil deception of  Satan. Pray for these people because they really do not know what they do.

But perhaps some of them do know what they are doing, and are consciously following Satan.

God is able to do that which He wants to do.

We are to pray and to share the Gospel of Christ with this sin sick world.

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom b’Yeshua

MARANATHA!

 

The “CHRISLAM” Pope: Our World is Being Set Up for the ONE WORLD RELIGION

On By Geri UngureanIn Francis the Chrislam Pope, Uncategorized6 Comments

Think  about this, brethren:

  • Francis wants all Protestant Christians to “come home” to the Catholic Church
  •  Francis is unapologetically SOCIALIST
  •  Francis sides with the Palestinians
  • Francis is now on his mission to Muslim countries

It seems that Francis is including the Muslim World in his ecumenical madness!

Can you say ONE WORLD RELIGION?

From arabnews.com

VATICAN CITY: When Francis becomes the first pope to visit the Arabian peninsula on Sunday, he takes another important step in his efforts to build bridges with Islam and confirms inter-religious dialogue as a keystone of his papacy.
In the long, complicated and often bloody history of papal relations with the Muslim world, Argentine pontiff Jorge Bergoglio stands out for his fraternal language and broader desire to reach out across religious divides.
“Pope Francis is different from his predecessor Benedict XVI because he prefers interpersonal encounters to theological subtleties,” said Valentino Cottini who teaches Islamic-Christian relations at the Pontifical Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies (PISAI) in Rome.

Retired German pope Benedict XVI, a theologian, spoke the most about Islam, giving 188 speeches on the subject. But years of glacial relations followed his decision to quote a XIVth century Byzantine emperor who spoke of against Islam.

He insisted the comment during a 2006 speech at Regensburg in Germany did not reflect his own views but the damage was done and street protests erupted in the Muslim world.   (emphasis added)

Dialogue

Pope Francis, however, avoids analyzing the Qur’an.
His constant appeals for refugees to be welcomed, many of whom are Muslim, have helped win him support from the community, just as when he brought three Muslim families back on the papal plane from the Greek island of Lesbos.
In 2016 and 2017 the spiritual leader of the world’s 1.3 billion Catholics met with the imam of Cairo’s Al-Azhar University, Sunni Islam’s highest body, Sheikh Ahmed Al-Tayeb. (emphasis added)

Tayeb, an Islamic philosophy lecturer critical of jihadists who draw inspiration from hard-line salafism, will again meet with the pope on Monday in the United Arab Emirates for an international inter-religious meeting.

To read the rest of the arabnews article click here

What We Were NOT Told

Years ago, after Pope Benedict XVI “stepped down” from his papal role in the Vatican, many were shocked.  It had not been since 1400 that a pope resigned.

Pope Benedict was a very conservative minded man. There are two separate issues which came into play for this man to step down.

Personally, I do not believe that he voluntarily stepped down. I believe that he was forced out and was given the option to tell the world that he was merely stepping down from his position.

I am republishing two separate articles I wrote to help the reader to understand what truly happened.

First article from 2017:

Why Pope Benedict XVI Really Stepped Down: the Insidious Relationship Between the Vatican and Islam

Remember when Pope Benedict resigned and how the world was so shocked? No pope had resigned since 1400. It certainly was a hush hush matter at the Vatican. Not much was said nor explained except that this was the choice of Pope Benedict.

I think not.

I think that this was the choice of the powers that be inside the Vatican – they made the decision that this man should step down; and the reason will shock you.

I was aware of what Pope Benedict had done before his resignation, but I did not know the impact it would have, nor how the Vatican’s relationship with the Muslim world would be a key factor in the changes which came to fruition when Pope Francis took the papal throne.

At a commencement at a University in Regensburg, Bavaria,  Pope Benedict spoke words which, although very true, Muslim clerics found to be offensive and disparaging to Islam.

From Benedict’s Speech:

“Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.”

The Muslim Response to Pope Benedict’s words:

From Arabnews.com (March 3, 2013)

Pope Benedict’s Resignation and Interfaith Dialogues   (remember this is from arabnews.com)

WHEN Pope Benedict XVI formally resigned last Thursday (Feb. 28), it was a dramatic moment. No pope had resigned since 1400, historians said. However, what I would like to address here is how Benedict’s papacy tried to reverse advances made in Catholic dialogue with other religions, especially Muslims, and what to expect from the new pope.

Early in his tenure, Pope Benedict XVI set the tone in his relationship with Islam and Muslims. In a speech he gave in Regensburg, Germany, in September 2006, he demonstrated poor understanding of Islam’s history and teachings.

The pope cited a 14th-century Byzantine emperor’s offensive remarks about Islam and the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). He then went on to accuse Muslims of spreading their faith by the sword, of intolerance toward those who differed with them, and that those attitudes were deeply rooted in their faith. None of these claims were true, of course, as many historians have since taken the pope to task for being so cavalier about the facts of history.

Muslims were deeply offended. There were uproar and widespread public protests throughout the Muslim world, as well as condemnations by scores of heads of state and religious leaders.

Many took the pope’s 2006 remarks not as an academic faux pas, but as an expression of deep hostility toward Muslims and their faith, calculated to reverse decades of Muslim-Christian dialogue that had led to significant achievements in improving their relationship.

It was especially ironic that the head of the Catholic church was critical of what he claimed to be Muslims’ intolerance toward non-Muslims, and their hostility to science and reason during their history. He could not have been unaware of the church’s bloody wars against non-Catholics, Muslims included, the Spanish Inquisition, the Crusades, burning at the stake of scientists and heretics. All of those events took place during a time when Muslims encouraged scientific innovation and tolerated heretics and non-Muslims, including many Christian churches that have survived until today, while they were made extinct in regions under the papacy’s influence.

Although Pope Benedict has since apologized for the Regensburg offensive remarks, the Vatican under his leadership continued to undo the work undertaken by his predecessors to improve dialogue within the Catholic Church and with other faiths.

It turned out that undermining dialogue with Muslims was just a small part of a greater project to unravel reforms undertaken under the Second Vatican Council 1962-1965 (Vatican II, for short), the most significant conclave in the Church’s modern history that has in many ways changed its character, direction and relations with the modern world. –source  

Read rest of article from Arabnews.com

The Second Vatican Council and Changes Towards Islam

Number 841 in the book of Catechism was added during the Second Vatican Council. It reads:

841 “The Church’s relationship with the Muslims. “The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.” -source

The God of the Bible and Allah

The Real Jesus is NOT Isa from the Qur’an

I do hope that this article has brought clarity to why Pope Benedict had to step down from his position. I do not believe that this was a decision he made on his own.  The globalists are pressuring many within the Vatican, and Pope Francis is quite obviously a Leftist/Marxist Globalist himself!  The globalists were successful in getting “their man” into the highest position in the Vatican.

Now we see Pope Francis bringing Muslim clerics to pray with him into the Vatican. This pope seems to be striving for a One World Religion. According to Francis – even atheists can go to heaven!

Second Reason Benedict Stepped Down

Because of Benedict’s conservative views, he was also very tough on priests who were caught after many years of molesting children in the church. He never made excuses for them. He demanded swift action by the Vatican to relieve these men of their positions and to bring charges against them.

St. Sebastian’s Angels    (A website for Gay priests to gather)

I wrote an article not long ago about a large group of gay priests. They call themselves  “St. Sebastian’s Angels.” They actually have their own website.  It was a very difficult piece for me to write; I felt physically sick when I read the words of these men. One of the main points about this group of men is that they detested Pope Benedict.

I will post the link to the article here:

St. Sebastian’s Angels: A Network of Gay Priests     <click to read

In the dialogue between these gay priests on their website, you will see how they talked about Pope Benedict.  They HATED him because he was not putting up with homosexuality in the priesthood.  They would laugh at him and disparage him because he was from Germany. Sometimes during the chat they called him Hitler.

Brethren, if we look at the years that Pope Francis has been in power, we see an ultra-liberal man, who now is trying to coverup and even exonerate priests who are pedophiles and have ruined the lives of untold number of children through the years.

Francis has been calling for Protestants to “Return to Rome.”  He is a pope who is striving for a One World Religion – his Ecumenism is proof of that.

So, here we have two men – one very conservative who fought for the damaged children of abusers in the Catholic Church. A conservative who would not put up with homosexual priests. And a man who spoke truth to the world about Islam. He was in no way politically correct.

And then there is Francis who is the polar opposite of Benedict. He attempted to cover up the problem of pedophile priests, and now is wanting to pardon them; along with his liberal Marxist/Socialist ways, this has prompted many in the Vatican to ask for his resignation.  It will be so interesting to see how this plays out.

Now there is a theologian wanting to investigate the so-called resignation of Pope Benedict. Pope Francis has spoken more about “Global warming” and redistribution of wealth, than he has about Jesus Christ and his Gospel!

But after all, we are talking about the Catholic Church which is a cult.

False Prophet?

Many of us wonder if Francis might be the False Prophet spoken of in God’s Word.  If he is not – he is certainly a “type” and foreshadowing of that False Prophet.

I am hoping that this article has brought some clarity to many about Benedict and Francis as the events in the Vatican continue to unfold.

Brethren, these are such wicked times,  and they are such as we’ve not seen in our lifetimes. I pray right along with all of you that our Lord Jesus is coming soon to rapture His own!

This place is certainly not our home!

How Can I be Saved?

Shalom b’Yeshua

MARANATHA!

 

 

Joyce Meyer: “My Faith Will Raise the Dead and Yoga is Fine for Christians”

On By Geri UngureanIn Joyce Meyer31 Comments

I remember when I first watched Joyce Meyer after some women at church recommended her.  It’s hard to put into words, but I felt that something was wrong. I had no desire to watch or listen to her again.

Then I began to research Ms. Meyer for an article.

I wrote an article called “Joyce Meyer – Apostate Millionaire”   in 2015

Here is that article:

Some will no doubt be angry at this article. That has never stopped me from telling the truth.  If you are a Joyce Meyer fan, I would suggest that you take a step back, and look at all of the evidence against this woman. Then ask the Lord if this is a person He would want you to follow.

First of all, I want to say that I do not believe that the Bible supports women being pastors.  When the attributes of church leaders are described in the Word, it is always referring to men.  So, with that out of the way, I will continue about Ms. Meyer.

I was in Family Christian Bookstore today, waiting in line. The lady in front of me asked the cashier (manager) where the Joyce Meyer materials were. They struck up a conversation about their adoration of Meyer. Then I noticed that the manager lowered her voice while telling this customer a story about Meyer.  I was still able to hear her as she spoke in a way that showed she was trying to keep the information somewhat private.

The manager said to the customer, “I know Joyce Meyer personally.”  Then she put her hand beside her mouth, as one does when telling a secret, and said “Joyce Meyer took us all on vacation.” The customer was so impressed. I was so disgusted, and it was only God who held me back from saying what I thought of this whole discussion about Ms. Meyer.

I can only think that when she said “Took us all on vacation” it meant the managers of all of the Family Christian Bookstores – nationwide. This only served to confirm to me that Joyce Meyer is a business woman, with an empire worth many millions of dollars.

If you take the time to research Joyce Meyer, you will see that she is worth over $25 million. She lives in a house worth $2 million, and bought homes worth $2 million for each of her children. She owns a corporate jet worth $10 million. She recently purchased a $500,000 vacation home. She says that God made her rich.  I say hogwash. She got rich off of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, which is wrong on so many levels.

On top of that, she teaches heresy. And THAT is what the rest of this article will be focused upon.

FROM CARM.ORG

Following is a list of quotes from Joyce Meyer, along with responses.

Jesus stopped being the Son of God:  “He could have helped himself up until the point where he said I commend my spirit into your hands, at that point he could  do nothing for himself anymore. He had become sin, he was no longer the Son of God. He was sin.”

Response:  This is heresy.  Jesus did not ever stop becoming the son of God.  Essentially what she is saying is that Jesus stopped being divine, the eternal son, second person of the Trinity. This is an attack on the very nature of Christ and it is a dangerous false teaching.  Joyce Meyer needs to repent and retract this statement.  There is no place in Scripture that says Jesus stopped being the son of God.  She’s adding to the word of God and placing in the hearts and minds of listeners false doctrine.

Jesus was born again:  “The minute that blood sacrifice was accepted Jesus was the first human being that was ever born again,”

Response:  This is just plain wrong.  Being born again means to be saved from the wrath of God for a person’s sins (Eph. 2:1-3), to have a new birth (John 3:3), and to be regenerated (2 Cor. 5:17).  Mrs. Meyer is simply wrong biblically.  Why does she teach this?  It can only be because she has bought into many of the errors of the Positive Confession movement where it is sometimes said that Jesus lost his divine nature, went to hell, finished the atonement in hell, and was born again!  This is a serious error since it implies that Jesus needed to be changed…

Jesus paid for our sins in hell:  “He became our sacrifice and died on the cross. He did not stay dead. He was in the grave three days. During that time he entered hell, where you and I deserve to go (legally) because of our sin. He paid the price there.” (The most important decision you’ll ever make, by Joyce Meyer, second printing, may 1993, page 35)

Response:  This is blatantly wrong.  Jesus did not pay the price of our redemption in hell.  He paid the price on the cross.  It was finished on the cross when he said, “It is finished” (John 19:30).  Also, consider the following verses:

  • Col. 1:20, “and through Him to reconcile all things to Himself, having made peace through the blood of His cross; through Him, I say, whether things on earth or things in heaven.”
  • Col. 2:14, “having canceled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us and which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way,having nailed it to the cross.”
  • 1 Pet. 2:24, “and He Himself bore our sins in His body on the cross, that we might die to sin and live to righteousness; for by His wounds you were healed.”

Jesus went to hell in our place and was tormented:  “Jesus paid on the cross and went to hell in my place. Then as God had promised, on the third day Jesus rose from the dead. The scene in the spirit realm went something like this: God rose up from his throne and said to demon powers tormenting the sinless son of God, ‘let him go.’ Then the resurrection power of Almighty God went through hell and filled Jesus. On earth his grave where they had buried him was filled with light as the power of God filled his body. He was resurrected from the dead — the first born again man.” (The most important decision you’ll ever make, by Joyce Meyer, second printing, may 1993, page 36)

Response:  Where does she get this completely fictitious dialogue between God and the demon powers?  It is made up, not founded in scripture, and mistakenly assumes that Jesus went to hell, the place of torment and suffering after he died on the cross.  The Bible does not teach any such thing.  However, it does say that Jesus descended into the lower parts of the earth (Eph. 4:9).  This can mean that Jesus was physically buried, or that Jesus went to Hades to inform those who had already died about who he was and what he did on the cross, or it can be referring to his incarnation as is contrasted with his ascending into heaven (Eph. 4:10).  But there is simply no reason to believe that Jesus suffered in hell and finished the atonement there.  See response to Quote 1.

If you don’t believe Jesus went to hell, you cannot be saved:   “His spirit went to hell because that is where we deserve to go… There is no hope of anyone going to heaven unless they believe this truth.” (The most important decision you’ll ever make, by Joyce Meyer, second printing, may 1993, page 37)

Response:  This is an amazingly bad statement on her part.  She is saying that you cannot be saved from your sins unless you believe that Jesus went to the hell where we deserve to go.  This is a modification of the gospel message that saves, as is found in 1 Cor. 15:1-4 that states it is the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus.  Nowhere in scripture are we told to believe that Jesus suffered for us in hell or that he went there, where we deserve to go.  This is very wrong and is heretical.

We are called little gods:  “I was listening to a set of tapes by one man and he explained it like this..this kind of gets the point across…he said why do people have such a fit about God calling his creation, his creation, his man not his whole creation, but his man, little gods? If he’s God what’s he going to call them but the God kind? I mean if you as a human being have a baby you call it a human kind. If if [sic] cattle has another cattle they call it cattle kind. I mean what is God supposed to call ’em?Doesn’t the Bible say we are created in his image? Now you understand I am not saying you are god with a capital G. That is not the issue here so don’t go trying to stone me or yell blasphemy at me.” “The Bible says right here John 10:34…’and Jesus answered is it not written in your law I say we are gods.’ So men are called god’s by the law…”(Joyce Meyer).

Response:  In this clip she goes on to quote John 10:34 where Jesus says to the Pharisees “you are gods,” which is a quote from Psalm 82:6, which is an imprecatory Psalm of condemnation for the unrighteous judges.  Psalm 82:7says, nevertheless you will die like men.  She then turned to Psalm 82 and went through it.  The video stopped so I do not know what she would have said about the next, all important verse.

Joyce Meyer said she is not a sinner:  “I am not poor. I am not miserable and I am not a sinner. That is a lie from the pit of hell. That is what I were and if I still was then Jesus died in vain. I’m going to tell you something folks. I didn’t stop sinning until I finally got it through my thick head I wasn’t a sinner anymore. And the religious world thinks that’s heresy and they want to hang you for it. But the Bible says that I am righteous and I can’t be righteous and be a sinner at the same time.”

Response:  Mrs. Meyer needs a lesson in basic Bible.  1 John 1:8says, “If we say that we have no sin, we are deceiving ourselves, and the truth is not in us.”  Notice that John the apostle says “we.”  He is including himself with sinners.  Also, Paul said in Rom. 7:19-20,24, “For the good that I wish, I do not do; but I practice the very evil that I do not wish. 20 But if I am doing the very thing I do not wish, I am no longer the one doing it, but sin which dwells in me…24 Wretched man that I am! Who will set me free from the body of this death?”  Is Joyce Meyer better in Christian character than John and Paul?  I think not.  Mrs. Meyer fails to recognize her own sinfulness, and so mistakenly denies her own sinfulness.  I can only conclude that this false teaching comes from pride because it certainly isn’t biblical.

The host of hell were literally on Jesus and were laughing:  “They were having the biggest party that had ever been had. They had my Jesus in the floor and they were standing on his back jumping up and down laughing. And he had become sin. Don’t you think that God was pacing, wanting to put a stop to what was going on? All the host of hell were upon him. Upon him. Up on him. The angels were in agony.  All the creation is groaning. All the host of hell was upon him. Up on him. They got on him. They got him down in the floor and got on him and they were laughing and mocking. Ha ha ha ha. You trusted God and look where you ended up. You thought he’d save you and get you off that cross. He didn’t, ha ha ha.”

Response:  Where did she get this – in the sacred Book of Joycemeyeronomy?  It is certainly not in the Bible, and yet she has no problem teaching it as an authoritative truth.  Does she not know that the Bible says not to exceed what is written (1 Cor. 4:6)?  Yet, she has done exactly this.  She is in grave error and has violated God’s word that says that Jesus bore our sins in his body on the cross (1 Pet. 2:24) and finished the atonement on the cross (John 19:30) – not in hell at the hands of demons!  There is no way demons were literally standing ‘on’ Jesus.  Meyer is in gross error!

Joyce Meyer gets revelation knowledge:  “The Bible can’t even find any way to explain this. Not really that is why you have got to get it by revelation. There are no words to explain what I am telling you. I have got to just trust God that he is putting it into your spirit like he put it into mine.”

Response:  Revelation knowledge?  Is she on par with the apostles who received revelation knowledge from God himself?  Or how about the Old Testament prophets?  Does she, like them, also receive revelation knowledge from God?  If so, how would we know if it were true or not? The answer is simple:  we test what she says against Scripture, and it is obvious that she is getting a lot of things from somewhere else that contradict the word of God.” source

Well, there you have it. If you are truly born again, then after reading the beliefs and teachings of Joyce Meyer, there is really only one thing for you to do. Repent of following this woman, and read the Bible!!  In God’s Word is everything we need to know about Him and ourselves. Be like the people of the church in Berea:

“These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” (Acts 17:11)

And now Ms. Meyer is telling her millions of followers that her Faith will raise the dead!

“How to Walk in the Kind of Faith Which Raises the Dead”

Read article from Charisma News here

Joyce Meyer teaches her followers that meditation and Yoga are perfectly fine for the Christian.

NO, Joyce…….Yoga is NOT okay  for the Christian.

Read my article on the Kundalini Spirit and Yoga:

“Christian Yoga: Bringing the Kundalini Spirit into the Church”

Brethren, pray for Joyce Meyer and her followers. Pray for their eyes to be opened to the TRUTH of God’s Word!

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom b’Yeshua

MARANATHA!

 

 

Aborted Baby Parts Fused with Rodents: Scientists Show Their Hatred of God

On By Geri UngureanIn Abortion and Coming Judgment18 Comments

 

A mouse during the ‘humanisation’ experiments using stem cells

 

When I first read about this, I had so many emotions running through me – I could hardly breathe.

When I calmed down, I began to see a Truth in this unimaginable horror.  That truth was this:

Scientists  and others who say that they do not believe in God are LIARS.  They believe that He is there, but they HATE Him.  Why do they hate Him this much? Because they want to figure everything out, and they know they cannot.

And what better way to demonstrate this hatred of God and his creation than to purchase parts from aborted babies and then fuse these with RATS?

Judgment on America

Another thought I had after reading this story was that God’s FURY against America must be overflowing at this point.  And again, as I stated in a previous article, His fury is just as fierce (maybe more) towards those of us who belong to Him, who are becoming desensitized to abortion and the purchase of parts from aborted babies.

“For the time has come for judgment to begin at the house of God; and if it begins with us first, what will be the end of those who do not obey the gospel of God?” (1 Peter 4:17).

WHERE is the Outrage?? 

Are pastors speaking about the NY “Murder” Law from their pulpits?  I don’t have a number on this, but I think that I can safely say that most pastors wouldn’t touch that with a ten foot pole.  This also goes for the purchase of baby parts and fusing those parts with rats and mice.   Will a lot of pastors speak about this?  I don’t believe they will.

Some pastors are more concerned about keeping their 501C3 status so that Uncle Sam won’t take a portion of their money.  I’d love to see a letter written by our Lord Jesus to that church!

From thesun.co.uk

Mutant Mice: Aborted Babies’ Body Parts Fused with Mice to humanize them for grim “Frankenstein” experiments in U.S. Labs

Abortion clinics have been supplying researchers in the United States with terminated fetuses, parts of which are then fused with rodents as part of a bid to stamp out diseases and save millions of people.

ABORTED babies are being used in macabre experiments in the US that involve grafting dead fetus parts onto mice which are then used to test drugs.

Documents seen by Sun Online outline procedures that involve cutting out glands and livers of unborn children and then fusing them onto lab rodents.

 

The use of aborted baby body parts and stems cells has sparked anger among anti-abortion groups in the United States and it has been dubbed “Frankenstein” science.

And shocking undercover footage has led to the Donald Trump administration to reassess if the practice should be continued at all.

But what is known is that abortion clinics are supplying the fetal body parts, although they are not allowed to sell them.

Phelim McAleer, who has produced the film Gosnell, about a rogue abortionist, told Fox News: “Aborted babies bodies are a very valuable commodity in today’s America.

 

“Research institutions, elite universities, medical centers pay a lot of money for baby parts.”   (emphasis added)

Undercover footage in an abortion clinic run by Planned Parenthood shows dismembered aborted babies, with arms, legs and other parts.

They were being shown to pro-life activists from the Centre for Medical Progress who were posing as buyers.

The Sun Online has chosen not to show the graphic footage because it is too distressing.   ***** Too distressing?  How about the distress of the murdered pre-born child?   **My comment

Planned Parenthood has denied profiteering from the sale of body parts but it did say mums can give permission to donate their unborn fetus, which it said was common practice in such clinics.

Spokesperson Eric Ferrero said in a statement: “At several of our health centers, we help patients who want to donate tissue for scientific research, and we do this just like every other high-quality health care provider does.”

US GOVERNMENT BACKED RESEARCH

The controversial use of body parts is being spearheaded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which is part of the American government which is ploughing $98million (£75m) of taxpayers’ money into using aborted babies in the name of science.

But addressing Congress in December, NIH director Francis Collins defended the practice.

He said: “There is strong evidence that scientific benefits come from fetal tissue research, [which] can be done with an ethical framework.”

 ***Dr. Francis Collins claims to be a Christian.  I wrote him a strong letter about this.

Ross McKinney, chief scientific officer at the Association of American Medical Colleges in Washington, D.C., insisted fetal tissue “an important resource for biomedical research”.

In Science magazine, he said: “Fetal tissue research is already subject to a robust ethical and legal framework and research that continues to meet those standards should be continued.”

But in December the Trump administration halted buying any more fetal material and is currently reviewing the practise.

Government backed research projects are now having to rely on frozen stocks.

The Department of Health and Human Services cites “serious regulatory, moral, and ethical considerations” for the move. source

Brethren, I cannot find anymore words to place in this article. We know that we need to pray.

PRAY that our precious Lord Jesus comes SOON!

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom b’Yeshua

MARANATHA!!