What Needs to Be Said About Women: From the Garden of Eden to the Present Day

I realize that this article will not be one of my most popular.  I have wanted to write it  for a long time, but because of the controversial nature of what I am going to say – I have procrastinated.

This has been on my heart so heavily in the past few days. I believe that the Lord told me that it is time.

The Temptation in the Garden of Eden

 “Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said to the woman, “Has God indeed said, ‘You shall not eat of every tree of the garden’?”

 And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat the fruit of the trees of the garden; but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God has said, ‘You shall not eat it, nor shall you touch it, lest you die.’ ”

 Then the serpent said to the woman, “You will not surely die.  For God knows that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

 So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree desirable to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate. She also gave to her husband with her, and he ate.  Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves coverings.

 And they heard the sound of the Lord God walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the Lord God among the trees of the garden.

 Then the Lord God called to Adam and said to him, “Where are you?”

 So he said, “I heard Your voice in the garden, and I was afraid because I was naked; and I hid myself.”

 And He said, “Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree of which I commanded you that you should not eat?”

 Then the man said, “The woman whom You gave to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I ate.”

 And the Lord God said to the woman, “What is this you have done?”

The woman said, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate.”

 So the Lord God said to the serpent:

“Because you have done this,
You are cursed more than all cattle,
And more than every beast of the field;
On your belly you shall go,
And you shall eat dust
All the days of your life.
 And I will put enmity
Between you and the woman,
And between your seed and her Seed;
He shall bruise your head,
And you shall bruise His heel.”

 To the woman He said:

“I will greatly multiply your sorrow and your conception;
In pain you shall bring forth children;
Your desire shall be for your husband,
And he shall rule over you.”   (emphasis added)

 Then to Adam He said, “Because you have heeded the voice of your wife, and have eaten from the tree of which I commanded you, saying, ‘You shall not eat of it’:

“Cursed is the ground for your sake;
In toil you shall eat of it
All the days of your life.
Both thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you,
And you shall eat the herb of the field.
In the sweat of your face you shall eat bread
Till you return to the ground,
For out of it you were taken;
For dust you are,
And to dust you shall return”  (Genesis 3:1-19).

Brethren, I know that we have read this passage of Scripture so many times. But I believe that there are truths in these words which clearly show the dynamic between men and women; and how this has affected all of history up to these last days.

When God said to Eve “Your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you”  God was not speaking of a physical desire in this instance. He was telling Eve that she would desire to rule over Adam, but that Adam would rule over her.

From gotquestions.org

Question: “How is a woman’s desire for her husband a curse (Genesis 3:16)?

Answer: As God pronounces judgment on Eve for her part of the transgression in Eden, He says, “Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you” (Genesis 3:16). This verse causes some puzzlement. It would seem that a woman desiring her husband would be a good thing, and not a curse.

The Hebrew phrase in question does not include a verb and is literally translated “toward your husband your desire.” Since this judgment is predictive, the future tense verb “will be” is added for clarity: “Your desire will be for your husband.” The most basic and straightforward understanding of this verse is that woman and man would now have ongoing conflict. In contrast to the ideal conditions in the Garden of Eden and the harmony between Adam and Eve, their relationship, from that point on, would include a power struggle. The NLT translation makes it more evident: “You will desire to control your husband, but he will rule over you.”

God is saying that Eve would desire to rule over her husband, but her husband would instead rule over her. Replacing the mutually interdependent relationship the Lord had created was a desire for one spouse to lead the other. Sin had wrought discord. The battle of the sexes had begun. Both man and woman would now seek the upper hand in marriage. The man who was to lovingly care for and nurture his wife would now seek to rule her, and the wife would desire to wrest control from her husband.

It is important to note that this judgment only states what will take place. God says that man and woman will live in conflict and their relationship will become problematic. The statement “he shall rule over you” is not a biblical command for men to dominate women.

In the New Testament, God affirms His ideal relationship between man and woman in marriage. Christ-like qualities are emphasized. What the curse of sin created, believers in Christ are called to correct by living according to God’s Spirit. Ephesians 5 says that the wife should willingly submit to her husband’s authority in the home, in essence, refusing to scratch the curse-fueled itch to seize control (verses 22-24). Husbands are to love their wives unconditionally and sacrificially, just as Christ loves the Church (verses 25-30). The whole passage begins with an emphasis on mutual submission to one another: “Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ” (verse 21).

From the beginning, God’s focus has been love and respect between husband and wife. Though sin has tainted the original beauty of this relationship, God commands believers in Christ to pursue this ideal relationship between husband and wife, an ideal perfectly illustrated in Christ’s relationship with the Church. -source

This Sinful World 

When God pronounced the curses which would now come upon men and women, this was certainly not his Perfect Will.  Adam and Eve had perfection in the Garden until Eve was deceived by the devil and disobeyed God. Eve confessed that she was deceived.

Adam sinned willfully and ate from the tree when Eve offered it to him. I always wonder if the love he had for the woman God had given him became a stumbling block for Adam. The Word does not say that Adam was deceived. It only says that he ate.

Jezebel

King Ahab and Queen Jezebel served as leaders of the northern kingdom of Israel during a time of much evil in the land. King Ahab was an Israelite king who married a Sidonian woman named Jezebel and became involved in worshiping Baal, the god of her people. Ahab built a house to Baal in the capital city of Samaria and made an Asherah pole as a tool of pagan worship. We are told, “Ahab did more to provoke the LORD, the God of Israel, to anger than all the kings of Israel who were before him” (1 Kings 16:33).

Jezebel was likewise known for her evil actions. She was the daughter of Ethbaal, king of the Sidonians. After her marriage to Ahab, her first recorded action was cutting off the prophets of the Lord (1 Kings 18:4). Obadiah, a God-fearing officer in Ahab’s court, noted that Jezebel killed many prophets, despite Obadiah’s efforts to save them: “Has it not been told my lord what I did when Jezebel killed the prophets of the LORD, how I hid a hundred men of the LORD’s prophets by fifties in a cave and fed them with bread and water?” (1 Kings 18:13–14).   (emphasis add).

Certainly, Jezebel from the Bible was an extreme case of a woman wanting to rule and reign.  I have heard many use the expression “Jezebel spirit” as they speak of a woman who asserts her authority over men, over women – over everyone.

.In Revelation 2:20 Jezebel’s reputation lives on as Jesus speaks against the church at Thyatira: “But I have this against you, that you tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess and is teaching and seducing my servants to practice sexual immorality and to eat food sacrificed to idols.” The woman’s name in Thyatira was probably not literally “Jezebel,” but her immorality and idolatry in preying upon God’s people was very Jezebel-like.

Both Ahab and Jezebel were leaders of God’s people who forsook the Lord and served other gods. The royal couple earned a reputation for sin and violence, and they both suffered violent deaths as part of God’s judgment on their actions. source

Fast forward to present times

Do you remember in the 1960’s when the Feminist movement really took off?  Gloria Steinem and Bella Abzug along with many other feminists burned their bras and told women that they didn’t need men any longer.

These women encouraged mothers to get out of their kitchens  – let someone else care for their children, because they should be in boardrooms across the nation. They told women that being a homemaker was demeaning and things were going to change.

I remember when this was happening. Men didn’t even know how to act anymore. They were unsure of their role in the home. They were afraid to open a door for women, fearing the they would be read the riot act!   My husband always holds doors for me and opens the car door.  I love it!

Margaret Sanger

Do you remember Margaret Sanger?  The Leftist liberals worship her memory and even give a “Margaret Sanger” award each year. Hillary Clinton received it.  What did Margaret Sanger do?  She started Planned Parenthood – she was a eugenicist. She organized what was known as the “Negro Protect.”  She recruited Black ministers to come on board with her. Her plan was to place Planned Parenthood clinics on many street corners of predominantly Black neighborhoods.

Sanger brought the Black ministers along with her to make everything look “kosher.” After all, she didn’t want the Black communities to actually understand that she wanted to bring the Black population down substantially. She was a RACIST.  She was an evil woman.

Madalyn Murray O’Hair

Do you remember Madalyn Murray O’Hair? Back in the 1960’s, she was successful in getting all prayer taken out of schools. She and one of her children died a grisly death and were found years later.

I remember reciting the Lord’s prayer in school. There I was, a Jewish kid, but I must say that saying that prayer in the morning in school was the highlight of my day!

Abortion

Are you as sickened as I am when you see thousands of women marching for the right to kill their unborn babies? The leaders of the Pro-Death movement are telling women to be proud  of their abortions – to “shout” about them. This is so satanic, it is almost beyond belief.   These women are so deceived – they follow a person like Linda Sarsour, a Muslim who would NEVER consider aborting her child.   But she became the Pied Piper for the “Women’s” movement.

The Pro-Death leaders also speak for the women who follow them, and say that women do not regret their abortions. This is just not true. Look at Silent No More Awareness website and you will see many women who grieve over their abortions.

Women pastors

Brethren, have you noticed that in the mainline denominations, there are actually more women pastors than men? Look up the Methodist church and the Presbyterian Church USA – you will see.

And what do the mainline churches (dead churches) believe in?  They HATE Israel. They affirm abortion and gay marriage and transgenderism. Can you say “Deceived?”

Even the Evangelical churches have famous (infamous) women pastors.  Think about Beth Moore and Joyce Meyer’s errant and often heretical teachings!

I wrote an article a couple of years ago about a time then hubby and I visited a Baptist church. We found out the the head pastor ordained women as pastors in that church.

That morning they were have baby dedications.  There was a woman pastor blessing the babies. Then they presented to the parents – NOT a Bible, but the book “Jesus Calling!”   We never went back.

The Bible is Clear about Pastors Being Men

The Word says that women should not have authority over men in the church. But you say to me “Jesus said that we are all equal.”  Yes – we are equal in His eyes but we have different roles.

the older women likewise, that they be reverent in behavior, not slanderers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things—  that they admonish the young women to love their husbands, to love their children,  to be discreet, chaste, homemakers, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be blasphemed”  (Titus 2:3-5).

In marriage the covering of the woman is her husband. His covering is Jesus. I will tell you right now that I have fought those feelings of desiring to be in control in my marriage.  But then my husband and I will go back to the Word, and I will realize that this is my sinful flesh trying to gain control.  Am I saying that husbands should be mean-spirited towards their wives. Of course not!

When my husband and I go back to the Word, we both realize that the Lord wants us to be kind and respectful to one other. But I immediately remember that my husband is my covering. Sometimes  as we talk things over, he will see points which I have made and take them into consideration.  Anyway, we go before the Lord and invariable I will see wisdom in my husband and I will submit to him.

 “Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her”  (Ephesians 5:25).

“I desire therefore that the men pray everywhere, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting;  in like manner also, that the women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with propriety and moderation, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or costly clothing,  but, which is proper for women professing godliness, with good works.  Let a woman learn in silence with all submission.  And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence.  For Adam was formed first, then Eve.  And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression.  Nevertheless she will be saved in childbearing if they continue in faith, love, and holiness, with self-control” (1 Timothy 2:8-15).

As I said in the beginning of this piece, I know that there will be readers who are not enthralled with the content of this article.

I consider myself a writer of truth.  The ONLY place where I look for absolute Truth is from the Word of God.

If you feel that I have been somehow “unfair” to women, please go before the Lord and ask Him to show you Truth from His Holy Word.

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom b’Yeshua

MARANATHA!

 

 

 

 

Snopes Says That Abortion is Not the Leading Cause of Death Because Babies Don’t Die in Abortions

Sometimes I feel like my head will explode………..you too?

I have written about Snopes in the past, and was quickly put in FB jail. Evidently, FB hired Snopes as their fact checker.   OY.

There are still Christians using these Leftists to fact check for them.  You may as well write to the NY Times and ask them if something is true or not!  Seriously – it’s the same thing.

Abortion was the leading cause of death in 2018.  Most of us read this and it is true.

Lifenews.com came out with an article about Snopes and how they said that abortion was NOT the leading cause of death last year.  Wait till you see their rationale.

From lifenews.com

Snopes Claims Abortion Isn’t the Leading Cause of Death Because Babies Don’t Die in Abortions

Snopes has become more of a left-wing ideology proponent than a fact checker.

The site recently ran a piece attacking the assertion that abortion is the leading cause of death in the world, a statistic reported by LifeNews.com, Breitbart and other conservative outlets.

The statistic came by comparing data from Worldometers, an independent site that collects and reports data from governments and other reputable organizations. Breitbart contrasted the abortion numbers to other causes of death, including cancer, HIV/AIDS, traffic accidents and suicide, and found that abortions far outnumbered every other cause.

The site estimated there were 41.9 million abortions in the world in 2018.

But Snopes argued that abortions are a “medical procedure,” not a cause of death.

According to its report:

“Stating that abortion is the “leading cause of death” worldwide (as opposed to a medical procedure) is a problematic pronouncement, because that stance takes a political position, one which is at odds with the scientific/medical world. The medical community does not confer personhood upon fetuses that are not viable outside the womb, so counting abortion as a “cause of death” does not align with the practices of health organizations such as WHO and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) …”

This is when I was sure my head would explode!  

The “Life” or “Death” of a baby is NOT a political issue!!  It is a moral issue – but the Left have no morals, and they have NO regard for human life (unless of course it’s their own).

It’s a “medical procedure?” I wonder how the baby likes the medical procedure which burns him/her……tears them apart; and if they are born alive, they are left in a cold dark room to scream themselves to death. I wonder how the baby feels about the “medical procedure” when they feel that sharp object crushing their skulls right before they are pulled from their mother?   They  take the dead child to the lab to see which “parts” of the child will bring in the most money.

ABSOLUTELY SATANIC.

Now that we’ve established that Snopes are heartless Leftwing idiots, I will show the reader an article I did on them months ago….actually years ago, but I’ve reposted it a few times.

Still Using Snopes to Fact Check? PLEASE Just say NOPE to SNOPES

****This is a reprint of an article I wrote over a year ago.  I will probably be put in FB jail again – the first time I shared this I was in jail after just 3 shares!  

It horrifies me when Conservative Christians come to me and say “I fact checked this on SNOPES and they said it’s not true.”

Just say NOPE to SNOPES!

This left leaning outfit, run by an ultra liberal couple is definitely not the place for Conservatives to go for verification of facts. May I just say that if you want to be lied to, then Snopes is for you!  Talk about Fake News – Snopes is the place where left wing fake news is verified and news stories from Conservative sites are vilified.

Where is the discernment?

Actually, it is just as shocking to me when Conservatives are duped by rag websites like Snopes.  Many years ago, before I knew what this outfit was about, it only took me a few times before it was clear to me that I was dealing with lefties.  At that point I began to research Snopes. My suspicions were confirmed when I read that the couple who ran this cesspool of misinformation were died in the wool Liberal Democrats.

From dailycaller.com

Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger

Popular myth-busting website Snopes originally gained recognition for being the go-to site for disproving outlandish urban legends -such as the presence of UFOs in Haiti or the existence of human-animal hybrids in the Amazon jungle.

Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”

Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxesas much as anything else.

While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship (RELATED: Snopes Caught Lying About Lack Of American Flags At Democratic Convention)

She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of voting to sex because they “fear female agency.”

She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)

Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)

Her columns apparently failed to impress her readership, oftentimes failing to get more than 10-20 shares.

After blogging the Inquisitr, Lacapria joined Snopes, where she regularly plays defense for her fellow liberals.

She wrote a “fact check” article about Jimmy Carter’s unilateral ban of Iranian nationals from entering the country that looks more like an opinion column arguing against Donald Trump’s proposed Muslim ban.

Similarly, Lacapria — in another “fact check” article — argued Hillary Clinton hadn’t included Benghazi at all in her infamous “we didn’t lose a single person in Libya” gaffe. Lacapria claimed Clinton only meant to refer to the 2011 invasion of Libya (but not the 2012 Benghazi attack) but offered little fact-based evidence to support her claim.

After the Orlando terror attack, Lacapria claimed that just because Omar Mateen was a registered Democrat with an active voter registration status didn’t mean he was actually a Democrat. Her “fact check” argued that he might “have chosen a random political affiliation when he initially registered.”

Lacapria even tried to contradict the former Facebook workers who admitted that Facebook regularly censors conservative news, dismissing the news as “rumors.”

In that “fact check” article, Lacapria argued that “Facebook Trending’s blacklisting of ‘junk topics’ was not only not a scandalous development, but to be expected following the social network’s crackdown on fake news sites.” The opinion-heavy article was mockingly titled: The Algorithm Is Gonna Get You.

Lacapria again played defense for Clinton in a fact check article when she claimed: “Outrage over an expensive Armani jacket worn by Hillary Clinton was peppered with inaccurate details.”

One of the “inaccurate details” cited by Lacapria was that, “The cost of men’s suits worn by fellow politicians didn’t appear in the article for contrast.” She also argued the speech Clinton gave while wearing the $12,495 jacket, which discussed “raising wages and reducing inequality,” wasn’t actually about income inequality. source

Research to Vet Stories

As a writer, I must vet any major story before I publish it on my Word Press.  It’s not that difficult. You find credible Conservative websites and do a word search using your search engine on the topic of which you are researching. After your word search, place a coma and then type in one of your trustworthy Conservative sites.

Have you noticed that since Obama gave away the internet, when you use a search engine, it immediately takes you to liberal rag websites?

This will help you:

Go to 4conservative.com    <(click here for the best Conservative site online!  The have ALL of the Conservative websites listed for you!  Search for TRUTH there!

Fake news is everywhere. There are even websites which are known to be satirical. I can’t tell how many times I see people posting articles from “The Onion” and I have to tell them that it’s political satire.  At least these websites are up front about their tongue in cheek phony articles!

Brethren, we are not battling flesh and blood.  The left wing liberals are serving their master, Satan.  We must be as wise as serpents, yet as harmless as doves. Learn the devil’s traps and snares and more importantly, learn how to avoid them!

Share the Gospel of Jesus Christ!  That is why we are still here!

And don’t forget:  JUST SAY NOPE TO SNOPES!

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom b’Yeshua

MARANATHA!

DONATE

]

Cortez’ GREEN NEW DEAL Straight from the UNITED NATIONS

I’m sure that many of you have watched Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) as the press have interviewed her.  It is actually painful to watch and listen.  She is, as they say, not the sharpest knife in the drawer.  She struggles to make a complete thought in a sentence.

So I ask you – Did Cortez co-write the GREEN NEW DEAL?   That’s rhetorical.

The Green New Deal originated at the United Nations during the reign of Obama in the U.S.  Obama got the ball rolling on this U.N. initiative.  He even lost Billions of dollars from our “Stimulus Package.”  Do you remember that? Well, keep reading because you will see clearly where that money went.

Brethren, Cortez is a U.N. Globalist puppet.  But those who are pulling her strings should have done their homework. They would have seen that this woman does not know how to articulate her thoughts……..actually the thoughts of her handlers.

From the U.N. 

A Global GREEN NEW DEAL for Sustainable Development   (Emphasis added)

Financial support for stimulus packages in Developing Countries

In his letter to the leaders of the G-20, the Secretary-General of the United Nations has proposed to mobilize $1 trillion of financial support for developing countries to help them engage in an adequate response to the economic crisis. During 2009 and 2010, $500 billion should be provided in the form of enhanced international liquidity for compensatory financing to allow developing countries to refinance their sovereign debts as well as existing bank and corporate debts of their private sectors and accordingly unlock their domestic credit markets and regain access to trade credits and international capital markets. Another $500 billion would be needed in the form of enhanced long-term official development financing and development assistance to cover fiscal revenue gaps and provide developing countries the required space to protect social spending and finance fiscal stimulus packages.

So, did you catch that, brethren?  The U.N. wrote a letter to the G-20 Summit, stressing that the U.N. needed $1 trillion of financial support to help the under-developed countries “go green” along with the richer “developed” countries.  It is crystal clear that the Billions of Dollars which was “lost” by the Obama Administration (part of our “Stimulus Package” ) was sent to the U.N. in support of their GREEN NEW DEAL. 

Currently, most developing countries lack the capacity to undertake public works programs through deficit spending as are being envisaged by the developed countries as well as a few emerging economies that have such capacity. Therefore, substantial increases in compensatory financing, official development lending and assistance are needed for developing countries to increase their fiscal space, enhance their scope for countercyclical responses and avoid having to cut into necessary public expenditures.

Even though the resources are needed to overcome immediate balance-of-payments problems and to provide stimulus for economic recovery, they can be simultaneously used to address long-term development challenges. This would include continued investing in education, health, and job creation to meet the millennium development goals (MDGs). In the short-run, resources would also need to be allocated to strengthen social protection systems. This will be critical to prevent millions of people in developing countries who are directly affected by rising unemployment, volatile agricultural prices and declining export demand, and other consequences of the crisis from falling deeper into poverty and thus prevent major setbacks in the progress made towards the MDGs.

What a deal!  The under-developed countries get a big wad of cash, but there ARE strings attached. Part of the money MUST go to “Green” initiatives for the country to be onboard with the U.N. goals.  Sounds a bit mafioso, no?

The crisis and the required fiscal response should also provide an opportunity to make long-term investments in agricultural development to address the problem of food insecurity  and in the “greening” of the economies of developed and developing countries in order to combat climate change.

Oh, there are those words – “Greening” and of course “Climate Change!”

 See UN-DESA Policy Brief No. 13 for further detail of the $1 trillion dollar plan.

So, let’s go there……..

The UN-DESA Policy Brief No. 13 

The Trillion Dollar Plan       <click here to read about the $$$

Back to the U.N.’s  GREEN NEW DEAL 

Making national stimulus packages ‘green’ and equitable

The United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) has demanded that one-quarter of the three trillion dollars envisaged to be allocated to national stimulus packages by major economies be channeled into environmentally beneficial investments. Those include sustainable transport, energy efficiency, renewable energy, afforestation and reforestation, sustainable agriculture, and biodiversity protection.

*** U.N. is moving the money around – not good. And they are “demanding” – sounds like strong-arming to me.

This is a timely suggestion. As mentioned, one of the goals of the New Deal was to restore ecological health in the Midwest of the United States, thus addressing social security as well as food security and conservation objectives. Given the multiple environmental challenges faced by the world today, it would be most desirable to attract investment into areas that can help put the global economy on a more sustainable pathway.

Sneaky sneaky.  Wasn’t it Obama who hurt the midwest farmers during his reign?   Read this article on the plight of the farmers under Obama from the Daily Signal.   NOTHING is coincidental!

However, the UNEP proposal needs to be enhanced through attention to two additional dimensions.

First, as argued above, it is critical that developing countries can, as developed countries have done, develop fiscal stimulus packages to prevent their economies from contracting. These stimulus packages can also provide the opportunity to lay the foundation for a new period of sustainable growth. Given the unmet needs for basic infrastructure, additional investment in such sectors is very likely to have a significant positive effect on growth.

Second, it also needs to be ensured that such investment is targeted especially at poor and vulnerable groups and regions within these countries. In other words, the investment should lead to the revival of growth that is both ecologically and socially sustainable.

For example, the demand for transport is growing dramatically in developing countries. Much of this is in the form of automobiles, which are environmentally harmful, contributive towards urban congestion, and beyond the means of a majority of people in developing countries. A shift to clean public transport is desirable from economic, environmental, and social viewpoints.

NOW we seeing Cortez’ Green New Deal more clearly.  Get rid of cars, trucks, airplanes – any mode of transportation which is not in compliance with the “Sustainable Goals” of the U.N.   Oh, but never mind that our stores will not be stocked with food because the carriers of this food will be GONE.  This is beyond belief.  This will begin a domino effect on the economy, and communities will begin to starve.

But you can believe that the “elite” will be able to continue flying in their private planes, and they will NEVER be hungry!  Do you see it now?  This is diabolical!

Support for agricultural productivity and the creation of markets could be an important feature of national stimulus packages in developing countries, many of which are still highly dependent on agriculture such that shocks on agricultural markets can quickly put high proportions of the population into poverty. Re-invigorating extensions services will be a key component. Special attention would be needed for investments that promote a shift towards ecologically sustainable agriculture. Measures to shield small farmers from price volatility on global markets can also act as important safety nets.

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs March 2009

Examples of socially useful public works activities in developing countries include:

  • Projects could address water storage and drainage, contributing to agricultural productivity as well as climate adaptation, e.g. in many developing countries simple earthen storage dams could be constructed and existing drainage and canal networks rehabilitated. Digging of wells and basic flood barriers/levees are other options.
  • Access to basic sanitation remains a major challenge in developing countries. Improvements could make a major contribution to the achievement of MDG 4, reducing child mortality. Public works programs could target the construction of basic sanitation infrastructure, as well as the regeneration of wetland ecosystems that act as “filters” for watercourses.

A recent study of HSBC Global Research has ranked various governmental initiatives on the basis of their “greenness”. This ranking could be adapted to include the social dimension and used to guide national policy making in all countries towards greater environmental and social sustainability.

Policy Coordination, Collaborative Programs and Initiatives

The third component of the Global Green New Deal would be collaborative initiatives of governments of rich and poor countries simultaneously to create jobs in developed countries while generating strong developmental impacts in developing countries. Such initiatives could be pursued in part by using the resources mobilized by developed countries’ stimulus packages. But over the longer term, the reforms of the international financial and multilateral trading systems will need to support the investments required to manage the shift to low carbon economies in both rich and poor countries alike.

***Does the reader remember back in 2009 when billions of dollars (part of our Stimulus package, was unaccounted for?  Obama’s administration never did find out what happened to that money. But now we know, don’t we? It went straight to the Green New Deal as part of Agenda 21 which became the Sustainable Development Goals of 2015.

Read the rest of the U.N.’s GREEN NEW DEAL here

We know that all of this has to happen to fulfill Bible Prophecy.  I feel led to research and educate the readers.  This information could be used when sharing the Gospel with a person.  All of this is leading to a One World Government (NWO) and a person who does not believe the Word of God, just might change their mind once they see what is happening globally.

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom b’Yeshua

MARANATHA!