Month: July 2015

POPE FRANCIS – THE FALSE PROPHET?

On By Geri UngureanIn Uncategorized3 Comments

sinister
For a few years, I have been reading various articles which put forth the question “Could Pope Francis be the False Prophet, spoken of in God’s Word?”  I would turn this over in my mind; sometimes thinking that he very well could be, but other times I just brushed it aside as a remote possibility.

I have done much research on this pope. I found that when he was Archbishop Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Buenos Aires, he had close friends who were Wiccans and pagans. He even allowed some Unitarian Universalist acquaintances to hold services in his Cathedral in Buenos  Aires, Venezuela.  I read that Wiccans, pagans and New Agers in general, were intrigued by the man, and many truly loved him.

“Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God” (James 4:4).

But what I’ve stumbled upon about this man, which I will post in this article, is alarming, and the question as to whether we are seeing the prophesied False Prophet is beginning to come into focus. I am convinced that this man will usher in the Antichrist.  

SEPTEMBER 2015
We have been seeing in the news that Pope Francis is now very much on board with the Climate Change fanatics.  He is parroting their mantras “Climate change is the most important thing facing the world today.”  It’s strange to me that this new passion of the pontiff’s is directly in line with the UN’s sustainable development agenda, which will be launched by the UN in September. 

But maybe not so strange after all. Pope Francis is scheduled to speak before the UN, and will give the speech that kicks off the conference on the new “sustainable” (that word is used frequently by the UN) development agenda.  The Pope has decided that Climate Change will be his legacy.  Has anyone wondered what climate change has to do with the Gospel of Jesus Christ?

FROM ZEROHEDGE.COM:
“This radical new agenda is already being called “Agenda 21 on steroids” because it goes so much farther than Agenda 21 ever did.  The new UN agenda does not just address the environment – it also addresses issues such as poverty, agriculture, education and gender equality.  It is essentially a blueprint for governing the entire planet, and that sounds very much like what Pope Francis also wants.” [1]

THE POPE’S ENCYCLICAL LETTER
Pope Francis has released an encyclical letter to the world, which he states will become part of the Catholic Church’s writings. Many believe that the timing of the release of the letter was to have maximum public impact, prior to the Pope’s speech at the UN in September.

“The rare encyclical, called “Laudato Sii”, or “Praised Be”, has been timed to have maximum public impact ahead of the pope’s meeting with Barack Obama and his address to the US Congress and the UN general assembly in September.

It is also intended to improve the prospect of a strong new UN global agreement to cut climate emissions. By adding a moral dimension to the well-rehearsed scientific arguments, Francis hopes to raise the ambition of countries above their own self-interest to secure a strong deal in a crucial climate summit in Paris in November.

Much of the encyclical is not that surprising.  But what is raising eyebrows is the Pope’s call for a new global political authority.”  [1]

Global political authority?  Read that again.  The Pope is calling for a One World Governing authority. We are witnessing Bible Prophecy being fulfilled before our very eyes. Is it scary and disconcerting? Of course it is — we are human. But it is also very exciting to me that we are closer than many have thought to the glorious appearing of our Lord Jesus to catch us up with Him, and to be with Him forevermore.

“What is even more alarming is who will be on the stage with the Pope when this encyclical is formally released. John Schellnhuber is a German professor that has some very radical views on climate change.  For instance, he believes that our planet is overpopulated by at least six billion people.
Professor John Schellnhuber has been chosen as a speaker for the Vatican’s rolling out of a Papal document on climate change. He’s the professor who previously said the planet is overpopulated by at least six billion people. Now, the Vatican is giving him a platform which many expect will result in an official Church declaration in support of radical depopulation in the name of “climate science.”

And Schellnhuber also happens to believe that we need a new global political authority.  If he had his way, there would be an “Earth Constitution”, a “Global Council” directly elected by the people of the planet, and a “Planetary Court” that would be above all other courts on the globe.” 

FROM SCHELLNHUBER:
“Let me conclude this short contribution with a daydream about those key institutions that could bring about a sophisticated — and therefore more appropriate — version of the conventional “world government” notion. Global democracy might be organized around three core activities, namely (i) an Earth Constitution; (ii) a Global Council; and (iii) a Planetary Court. I cannot discuss these institutions in any detail here, but I would like to indicate at least that:
– the Earth Constitution would transcend the UN Charter and identify those first principles guiding humanity in its quest for freedom, dignity, security and sustainability;
– the Global Council would be an assembly of individuals elected directly by all people on Earth, where eligibility should be not constrained by geographical, religious, or cultural quotas; and
– the Planetary Court would be a transnational legal body open to appeals from everybody, especially with respect to violations of the Earth Constitution. [1]

Why would Pope Francis surround himself with people like this eugenicist, Schellnhuber?  One can only assume that these men are like minded. And if Pope Francis is aligning himself with this man, how will the Pope suggest that 6 billion people be eliminated?

A PREVIEW OF THE ENCYCLICAL LETTER BY POPE FRANCIS

The letter is over 180 pages long, so printing the entire document for this article would be impossible. I have chosen to post excerpts from the preface. I will post the website, where the readers may read this letter in its entirety.

I don’t know why I would be shocked at anything coming out of the Vatican; especially from this New Age Pope, but I believe that if you read the words of the preface, you will be alarmed at the verbiage used, and beliefs of this man who leads so many millions of people on this earth.

Pope Francis speaks of “Mother Earth” as our sister. I had to go back and read that again, thinking that perhaps I had misread it.  He will deliver this as his speech to the UN in September. 

EXCERPTS FROM THE PREFACE:
ENCYCLICAL LETTER
LAUDATO SI’
OF THE HOLY FATHER
FRANCIS
ON CARE FOR OUR COMMON HOME (excerpts)

“Laudato si’, mi’ Signore” – “Praise be to
you, my Lord”. In the words of this beautiful
canticle, Saint Francis of Assisi reminds us that
our common home is like a sister with whom we
share our life and a beautiful mother who opens
her arms to embrace us. “Praise be to you, my
Lord, through our Sister, Mother Earth, who
sustains and governs us, and who produces various
fruit with coloured flowers and herbs”.

“This sister now cries out to us because of
the harm we have inflicted on her by our irresponsible
use and abuse of the goods with which
God has endowed her. We have come to see
ourselves as her lords and masters, entitled to
plunder her at will. The violence present in our
hearts, wounded by sin, is also reflected in the
symptoms of sickness evident in the soil, in the
water, in the air and in all forms of life.” 

“This is why the earth herself, burdened and laid waste,
is among the most abandoned and maltreated of
our poor; she “groans in travail” (Rom 8:22). We
have forgotten that we ourselves are dust of the
earth (cf. Gen 2:7); our very bodies are made up
of her elements, we breathe her air and we receive
life and refreshment from her waters.”
Nothing in this world is indifferent to us.”

 “The destruction of the human environment
is extremely serious, not only because God
has entrusted the world to us men and women,
but because human life is itself a gift which must
be defended from various forms of debasement.
Every effort to protect and improve our world
entails profound changes in “lifestyles, models
of production and consumption, and the established
structures of power which today govern
societies.”

“Of God’s creation; for human beings to degrade
the integrity of the earth by causing changes in
its climate, by stripping the earth of its natural
forests or destroying its wetlands; for human beings
to contaminate the earth’s waters, its land, its
air, and its life – these are sins”. For “to commit
a crime against the natural world is a sin against
ourselves and a sin against God”.

 “The urgent challenge to protect our common
home includes a concern to bring the whole
human family together to seek a sustainable and
integral development, for we know that things
can change. The Creator does not abandon us;
he never forsakes his loving plan or repents of
having created us. Humanity still has the ability
to work together in building our common home.
Here I want to recognize, encourage and thank all
those striving in countless ways to guarantee the
protection of the home which we share. Particular
appreciation is owed to those who tirelessly
seek to resolve the tragic effects of environmental
degradation on the lives of the world’s poorest.
Young people demand change. They wonder
how anyone can claim to be building a better future
without thinking of the environmental crisis
and the sufferings of the excluded.
 I urgently appeal, then, for a new dialogue
about how we are shaping the future of our planet.
We need a conversation which includes everyone.”

“My appeal
Since the environmental challenge we are
undergoing, and its human roots, concern and
affect us all. The worldwide ecological movement
has already made considerable progress
and led to the establishment of numerous organizations
committed to raising awareness of
these challenges. Regrettably, many efforts to 
seek concrete solutions to the environmental crisis
have proved ineffective, not only because of
powerful opposition but also because of a more
general lack of interest. Obstructionist attitudes,
even on the part of believers, can range from denial
of the problem to indifference, nonchalant
resignation or blind confidence in technical solutions.
We require a new and universal solidarity.
As the bishops of Southern Africa have stated:
“Everyone’s talents and involvement are needed
to redress the damage caused by human abuse of
God’s creation”.  All of us can cooperate as instruments
of God for the care of creation, each
according to his or her own culture, experience,
involvements and talents.”

“It is my hope that this Encyclical Letter,
which is now added to the body of the Church’s
social teaching, can help us to acknowledge the
appeal, immensity and urgency of the challenge
we face. I will begin by briefly reviewing several
aspects of the present ecological crisis, with the
aim of drawing on the results of the best scientific
research available today, letting them touch us
deeply and provide a concrete foundation for the
ethical and spiritual itinerary that follows. I will
then consider some principles drawn from the
Judaeo-Christian tradition which can render our
commitment to the environment more coherent.
I will then attempt to get to the roots of the present situation, 
so as to consider not only its symptoms
but also its deepest causes.”  [2]

It amazes me how the Pope uses Scripture completely out of context. And his reference to “Mother Earth” being our sister – well, I just have no words for this. Also, it is glaringly obvious that he had much help writing this. Pope Francis is not a scientist or ecologist. He must be working closely with the UN and its minions. Again, I ask the reader — what does this have to do with the Gospel of Jesus Christ?

READ THE POPE’S LETTER IN ITS ENTIRETY HERE:
http://w2.vatican.va/content/dam/francesco/pdf/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si_en.pdf http://w2.vatican.va/content/dam/francesco/pdf/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si_en.pdf

THE ELITE WANT PEOPLE ELIMINATED FROM THE EARTH

By now, we are quite aware of the so-called Elite wanting to reduce the population of planet earth by at least 6 billion. Here are quotes which clearly show that this is a fact and not a conspiracy theory:

“The global elite are absolutely obsessed with reducing the size of the global population.   Many of them are convinced that it is the greatest problem that humanity is facing today.  So what do they believe should be done about it?  That is where there is disagreement.  Some argue for very forceful measures, while others prefer a “softer” approach.  But the vast majority of them do agree that humans are a “plague” upon the earth and that we will literally destroy the planet if we are left to our own devices.  To the elite, everything from global warming to our growing economic problems can be directly traced back to the lack of population control.”

QUOTES FROM THE WORLD’S ELITE
1. Charles Darwin (his thinking is at the foundation of so many of our scientific theories today): “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state as we may hope, than the Caucasian and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.”

2. Bill Gates: “The problem is that the population is growing the fastest where people are less able to deal with it. So it’s in the very poorest places that you’re going to have a tripling in population by 2050. (…) And we’ve got to make sure that we help out with the tools now so that they don’t have an impossible situation later.”

3. UK Television Presenter Sir David Attenborough: “We are a plague on the Earth. It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s not just climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde. Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now”

4. UN Under-Secretary-General Baroness Valerie Amos: “Population growth puts increased pressure on everything else…Girls and women must be educated. Even a few years’ basic education leads to smaller families.”

5. Paul Ehrlich, a former science adviser to president George W. Bush and the author of “The Population Bomb”: “Solving the population problem is not going to solve the problems of racism… of sexism… of religious intolerance… of war… of gross economic inequality. But if you don’t solve the population problem, you’re not going to solve any of those problems. Whatever problem you’re interested in, you’re not going to solve it unless you also solve the population problem.”

6. Dave Foreman, the co-founder of Earth First: “We humans have become a disease, the Humanpox.”

7. CNN Founder Ted Turner: “A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

8. Japan’s Deputy Prime Minister Taro Aso about medical patients with serious illnesses: “You cannot sleep well when you think it’s all paid by the government. This won’t be solved unless you let them hurry up and die.”

9. David Rockefeller: “The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.”

10. Richard Branson: “The truth is this: the Earth cannot provide enough food and fresh water for 10 billion people, never mind homes, never mind roads, hospitals and schools.”

11. Environmental activist Roger Martin: “On a finite planet, the optimum population providing the best quality of life for all, is clearly much smaller than the maximum, permitting bare survival. The more we are, the less for each; fewer people mean better lives.”

12. HBO personality Bill Maher: “I’m pro-choice, I’m for assisted suicide, I’m for regular suicide, I’m for whatever gets the freeway moving – that’s what I’m for. It’s too crowded, the planet is too crowded and we need to promote death.”

13. Al Gore: “One of the things we could do about it is to change the technologies, to put out less of this pollution, to stabilize the population, and one of the principal ways of doing that is to empower and educate girls and women. You have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management so women can choose how many children to have, the spacing of the children… You have to educate girls and empower women. And that’s the most powerful leveraging factor, and when that happens, then the population begins to stabilize and societies begin to make better choices and more balanced choices.”

14. MIT professor Penny Chisholm: “The real trick is, in terms of trying to level off at someplace lower than that 9 billion, is to get the birthrates in the developing countries to drop as fast as we can. And that will determine the level at which humans will level off on earth.”

15. Julia Whitty, a columnist for Mother Jones: “The only known solution to ecological overshoot is to decelerate our population growth faster than it’s decelerating now and eventually reverse it—at the same time we slow and eventually reverse the rate at which we consume the planet’s resources. Success in these twin endeavors will crack our most pressing global issues: climate change, food scarcity, water supplies, immigration, health care, biodiversity loss, even war. On one front, we’ve already made unprecedented strides, reducing global fertility from an average 4.92 children per woman in 1950 to 2.56 today—an accomplishment of trial and sometimes brutally coercive error, but also a result of one woman at a time making her individual choices. The speed of this childbearing revolution, swimming hard against biological programming, rates as perhaps our greatest collective feat to date.”

16. Colorado State University Professor Philip Cafaro in a paper entitled “Climate Ethics and Population Policy”: “Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for preventing catastrophic global climate change. Indeed, significantly reducing current human numbers may be necessary in order to do so.“

17. Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka: “I do not bear any ill will toward people. However, I am convinced that the world, including all humanity, WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us.”

18. Kofi Annan, UN Secretary-General from 1997-2006: “The idea that population growth guarantees a better life — financially or otherwise — is a myth that only those who sell nappies, prams and the like have any right to believe.”

19. Thoraya Ahmed Obaid, UN Under-Secretary-General from 2000-2010: “We cannot confront the massive challenges of poverty, hunger, disease and environmental destruction unless we address issues of population and reproductive health.”

20. Detroit News Columnist Nolan Finley: “Since the national attention is on birth control, here’s my idea: If we want to fight poverty, reduce violent crime and bring down our embarrassing drop-out rate, we should swap contraceptives for fluoride in Michigan’s drinking water.
We’ve got a baby problem in Michigan. Too many babies are born to immature parents who don’t have the skills to raise them, too many are delivered by poor women who can’t afford them, and too many are fathered by sorry layabouts who spread their seed like dandelions and then wander away from the consequences.”

21. John Guillebaud, professor of family planning at University College London: “The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights. An extra child is the equivalent of a lot of flights across the planet.”

22. Pope Francis: “Some people think that — excuse my expression here — that in order to be good Catholics we have to be like rabbits. No. Parenthood is about being responsible. This is clear.”

23. Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama 1950-present: “The growth in population is very much bound up with poverty, and in turn poverty plunders the Earth. When human groups are dying of hunger, they eat everything: grass, insects, everything. They cut down the trees, they leave the land dry and bare. All other concerns vanish. That’s why in the next 30 years the problems we call ‘environmental’ will be the hardest that humanity has to face.”

24. Democrat strategist Steven Rattner: “WE need death panels. Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start allocating health care resources more prudently — rationing, by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.”

25. Matthew Yglesias, a business and economics correspondent for Slate, in an article entitled “The Case for Death Panels, in One Chart”: “But not only is this health care spending on the elderly the key issue in the federal budget, our disproportionate allocation of health care dollars to old people surely accounts for the remarkable lack of apparent cost effectiveness of the American health care system. When the patient is already over 80, the simple fact of the matter is that no amount of treatment is going to work miracles in terms of life expectancy or quality of life.”

26. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class”

27. Gloria Steinem: “Everybody with a womb doesn’t have to have a child any more than everybody with vocal chords has to be an opera singer.”

28. Jane Goodall: “It’s our population growth that underlies just about every single one of the problems that we’ve inflicted on the planet. If there were just a few of us, then the nasty things we do wouldn’t really matter and Mother Nature would take care of it — but there are so many of us.”

29. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

30. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

31. Salon columnist Mary Elizabeth Williams in an article entitled “So What If Abortion Ends Life?”: “All life is not equal. That’s a difficult thing for liberals like me to talk about, lest we wind up looking like death-panel-loving, kill-your-grandma-and-your-precious-baby storm troopers. Yet a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it resides.”

32. Paul Ehrlich: “Basically, then, there are only two kinds of solutions to the population problem. One is a ‘birth rate solution,’ in which we find ways to lower the birth rate. The other is a ‘death rate solution,’ in which ways to raise the death rate — war, famine, pestilence — find us.”

33. Alberto Giubilini of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia and Francesca Minerva of the University of Melbourne in a paper published in the Journal of Medical Ethics: “[W]hen circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. … [W]e propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child.  Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.”

34. Nina Fedoroff, a key adviser to Hillary Clinton: “We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people.”

35. Barack Obama’s primary science adviser, John P. Holdren: “A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.
The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

36. David Brower, the first Executive Director of the Sierra Club: “Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license … All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”

37. Maurice Strong: “Either we reduce the world’s population voluntarily or nature will do this for us, but brutally.”

38. Thomas Ferguson, former official in the U.S. State Department Office of Population Affairs: “There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…”

39. Mikhail Gorbachev: “We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”

40. Jacques Costeau: “In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”

41. Television personality Kate Humble: “There are far too many people in the world…I think one of the most environmentally friendly things you can do is not to have children.”

42. Finnish environmentalist Pentti Linkola: “If there were a button I could press, I would sacrifice myself without hesitating if it meant millions of people would die”

43. Author Dan Brown: “Overpopulation is an issue so profound that all of us need to ask what should be done.”

44. Prince Phillip, husband of Queen Elizabeth II and co-founder of the World Wildlife Fund: “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”

45. Ashley Judd: “It’s unconscionable to breed, with the number of children who are starving to death in impoverished countries.”

46. Charles Darwin: “With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilised men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to small-pox. Thus the weak members of civilised societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed.” [3]

Brethren, it truly grieved me to write many things in this article. But at the same time, I feel that it is important for us to know what is going on at the UN, and behind the scenes most everywhere.   As the title of this piece clearly articulates, I do believe that this Pope is the last Pope, and is, as the Bible calls him, the False Prophet.

Take solace in knowing that Jesus will be coming for His own very soon. Scripture is being fulfilled at an incredible pace. We, who belong to Him, know that we will be with Him very soon. There are so many who are deluded. We are still to share Salvation with the lost, no matter if we have faith for their salvation or not.

God is able!!

MARANATHA!
grandmageri422@gmail.com
[1] http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-18/pope-francis-calls-new-global-political-authority-save-humanity
[2]  http://w2.vatican.va/content/dam/francesco/pdf/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si_en.pdfhttp://w2.vatican.va/content/dam/francesco/pdf/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si_en.pdf
[3] http://themostimportantnews.com/archives/46-population-control-quotes-that-show-how-badly-the-elite-want-to-wipe-us-all-out

AMERICA – THE NOT SO BEAUTIFUL

On By Geri UngureanIn Uncategorized9 Comments

America's demiseI’m angry. I’m really angry. Before I go on, I want to say that I know that God is in control. But as a Christian, it is my duty to stand for righteousness, and stand against evil!

When we were growing up, our dad would speak about America with tears in his eyes. His parents and my mom’s parents emigrated from Ukraine around 1903. They fled persecution as Jews to come to America. Our nation was known in the world as the best country on earth. My dad was a Patriot. He served in WWII as a medic in the army. He loved that America stood with Israel. I think that is what brought more tears to his eyes than anything else.

How has this happened so quickly, brethren? I remember in the 1950’s, saying the Lord’s Prayer in school. My parents knew that we said that, and they didn’t mind at all. I’m choking back tears, just writing this piece. I love my country, but it’s become a wasteland of gross sin. I don’t trust our government anymore. I just don’t know what is ahead for us, but it doesn’t look good.

In searching for a common thread throughout this downward spiral into the pit in which we find ourselves, I kept coming back to one thing — Communism. Khrushchev said this about America:

“We will bury you without firing a shot.”

He knew that our demise would come from within. He knew that his people were already here, and it was just a matter of time before our Republic would fall.

Recently, I wrote an article on the goals of Communism. I want to show you that Obama’s promise to fundamentally transform America, was directly in line with Communist goals:

1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

From the start, BHO has spoken of disarming America. He has worked with the U.N. to bring this about. Our founding fathers gave us the 2nd Amendment, because they knew the horror of tyranny, and they wanted to protect the American people from ever being overtaken by an external or internal force which strove to rob us of our freedom.

2. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

Obama has spoken often of befriending all countries, whether Communist or not. Within the last few months, he has developed a strong relationship with Cuba, and now we are building an American embassy there!

3. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.

Obama looks to the U.N. always for support for his goals for America.

4. Do away with loyalty oaths.

BHO has proclaimed to the world from his first day in office, that America is not exceptional. He discourages patriotism in America.

5. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

Well, that happened long ago with the Democratic Party. It has been filled with Marxists/Socialists for years, but now they brazenly confess this with much pride.

6. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

We saw this with the SCOTUS decision on gay marriage. What greater “Basic American institution” than marriage as defined by God as between one man and one woman? The gay community compare themselves to the Black community, which is ludicrous. Blacks are a race of people who were being denied their rights as American citizens. Gays are people who have chosen to live a sinful life. This is like comparing apples and oranges.

7. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

This began in the 1960’s, but presently has a stranglehold on our schools, since BHO came into power.

8. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.

Never in all my years have I seen a president of the United States own the press, as this president does. They might as well be paid by the government. Who knows, maybe they are.

9. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

The irony here is that there is a glaring double standard for free speech. Everyone is protected except for the Christian.

10. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

Can you say “Common Core?” And as far as TV, the shows are so immoral and offensive, my husband and I watch reruns of The Waltons and Little House on the Prairie.

11. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

Isn’t it amazing that in BHO’s first term, he defended marriage as between one man and one woman. Recently, after the SCOTUS decision on gay marriage, BHO lit up the White House with the colors of the gay flag. He knew that he would back gay marriage in his second term. Everything he does is calculated.

12. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.”

Sadly, this has happened within the church — even the discrediting of the Bible, and the move to social religion. BHO was quoted a few days ago, as telling the church that it’s time to change their views on gay marriage. GOD does NOT change!

13. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”

This happened many years ago because of an atheist named Madeline Murray O’Hair. The “separation of church and state” does not appear in our Constitution. It was coined as a phrase from a letter by Thomas Jefferson to a group of pastors from Danbury CT. They were concerned that the State might impose a religion on them. Jefferson assured these men that would not happen. It’s been told for so many years that this phrase is in the Constitution to protect the atheists from people of faith. Adolph Hitler said that if you tell a big lie long enough, the people will believe it. He was right.

14. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

BHO spends much of his time degrading our Constitution, and calling it outdated.

15. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use [“]united force[“] to solve economic, political or social problems.

These “uprisings” are well funded by George Soros, who is unapologetically Communist.

16. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike.

I believe that this is at the heart of Jade Helm 15. I believe that BHO plans to allow the World Court to have jurisdiction in the U.S. to help to quench any uprising. I also believe that this is how he will attempt to disarm us.

My dad would weep if he saw what has happened to this once great and beautiful country. Our founding fathers would weep as well, but I do not believe they would be surprised.

Benjamin Franklin was questioned by a woman after the Constitutional Convention of 1787, who asked him: “Doctor, what do we have, a republic or a monarchy?” He responded to her: “A Republic – if you can keep it.”

Brethren, it is our job now to share salvation with the lost. This has always been our job, but time is so short. We need to ask our Lord to give us an abundance of boldness to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ, so that many will be saved from their sins.

 “Go therefore  and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age” Amen. (Matthew 28:19-20).

COME LORD JESUS – COME QUICKLY!

What Are the Righteous to Do?

On By Geri UngureanIn Uncategorized1 Comment

lightontheword

“Faith in the Lord’s Righteousness

In the Lord I put my trust;
How can you say to my soul,
“Flee as a bird to your mountain”?
For look! The wicked bend their bow,
They make ready their arrow on the string,
That they may shoot secretly at the upright in heart.

If the foundations are destroyed,
What can the righteous do?
The Lord is in His holy temple,
The Lord’s throne is in heaven;
His eyes behold,
His eyelids test the sons of men.
The Lord tests the righteous,
But the wicked and the one who loves violence His soul hates.

Upon the wicked He will rain coals;
Fire and brimstone and a burning wind
Shall be the portion of their cup.
For the Lord is righteous,
He loves righteousness;
His countenance beholds the upright” (Psalm 11).

“But Peter and the other apostles answered and said: “We ought to obey God rather than men” (Acts 5:29).
Recently, I have felt many emotions. After the SCOTUS decision on gay marriage, the first emotion I felt was anger. I believe it was a righteous anger, of which the Lord does not consider sin. Then I became anxious. I thought long and hard about the ramifications of the highest court in our land, condoning this gross sin — a sin which God refers to as an abomination; and my anxiety level soared.

Then I began to turn this over in my mind; thinking of the law of God vs. the law of man. I thought of all of the pastors of Bible believing churches across America, and how these men must know what is coming. Franklin Graham was interviewed, and his words were just what our country needed to hear. I’m sure that the pastors who are troubled by what this court decision will mean for them, were encouraged by Franklin Graham’s words:

“Our nation has a spiritual problem and we need God’s forgiveness and we need to repent of our sins and turn from our sins because I do believe that God’s judgement will come on this nation,” the 62-year-old Graham stated.

“When we read in the Scripture, we see how God judged Israel time and time again, when they would turn their back on Him and begin to worship other gods, foreign gods, and God would bring judgement on Israel. I believe God could bring judgement on America.”

As it is not yet known what kind of legal protections Christian colleges will have, Graham wants those who are willing to stand for traditional marriage to be “prepared” to be persecuted.

“You better be ready and you better be prepared because it’s coming. I think there will be persecution of Christians for our stand,” Graham contends. “I believe the Bible. God loves us, no question about it. So when the president says that ‘#LoveWins,’ yes, God loves us but sin is sin and God has standards. When we violate those standards, any type of sexual relationship outside of a marriage relationship between a man and a woman is a sin against God.”

“I’m disappointed because our government is recognizing sin. This court is endorsing sin. That’s what homosexuality is. It’s a sin against God, just like any other sin. For the court to endorse sin, I am saddened for our country,” Graham added. “We will have to go by what the court says but as far as for me, I will never recognize it in my heart because God gave marriage between a man and a woman. … God gave us marriage and that’s just it, period. God does not change His mind.”

With the court ruling that it is a constitutional right for two individuals of the same sex to be legally married and receive the same government benefits that married heterosexual couples do, Graham argued that the ruling could lead the nation down a slippery slope that eventually results in other kinds of sexual immorality — like polygamy or incest — being deemed constitutional.

“I think our country is the loser because marriage is an institution that God has given. And for us now to give this to same-sex couples, who is to say that in a few years from now a man cannot marry his daughter or two men can marry one woman? Where do you draw the line?” Graham asked. “This is new ground that our country is beginning to enter and I am just concerned about where we head.”

When asked whether he agrees with other conservative pastors and political leaders who are calling for a “civil disobedience” over gay marriage, Graham said he would favor such an action depending on whether the court’s ruling is enforced in a way that requires pastors and churches to participate in same-sex weddings.

“I think we have to wait and see what the ruling is and how it is going to be interpreted,” Graham replied. “If pastors are going to be forced to provide marriage services for gay couples, I certainly am not going to do it because I would partaking in a sin against God. I just can’t do that.”

Although he disagrees with the homosexual lifestyle, Graham added that he loves people who struggle with same-sex attraction “enough to warn them” of God’s impending judgment of their behavior.

“Do I wish ill to gay couples? No, I don’t. But I want them to know the truth — that they are living a sinful life and a sinful relationship and God is going to judge sin one day and the Bible says that sinners will be separated from him in a place the Bible calls hell,” Graham explained. “I love gay couples enough to warn them that God is going to judge one day and I want them to repent and believe on the name of the Lord Jesus Christ so that they will be saved.” [1]

Then a beautiful emotion flooded my soul. God’s peace came into my heart.

“Peace I leave with you, My peace I give to you; not as the world gives do I give to you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid” (John 14:27).

Do not be troubled. Do not be afraid. Trust in the One who made the stars and calls them each by name. Trust in the One who loves us so much, that He sent His only Son, Jesus, to reconcile us to Him forever. Trust that He is fulfilling His Holy Word and prophecies. Trust Him completely.

PERSECUTION COMING

It is quite amazing how quickly everything is happening. But it is God’s timing and that has to be best. So, what are we to do? We are to stand on the Word of God, even if that means that we will be jailed. Think of our brethren whom have been martyred in various parts of the world. Just think of those final seconds, when they knew that they were going to die. I believe that just as Stephen looked up to heaven before he was stoned to death, and he saw Jesus standing at the right hand of God, that the Lord has been with His people, perhaps each in a different way; but always showing them that He is with them.

When we are incarcerated, we will pray for God to tell us what to say and how to act. Brethren, He did not bring us this far to just leave us now! He is our Father and He adores His children.

We are coming down to the last stretch. We are blessed beyond measure. Our home is not here. Our home is in heaven, and we will soon be there, my precious brothers and sisters.

We must pray for the ones who persecute us. They are watching us closely. I want to have the sweet fragrance of our Lord all about me. I want people to look at me and wonder how I can go through the persecution and still love those who hate me. We are His representatives on this earth, while we are here. Ask Him to use you in whatever way He wishes.

Talk to God every day; all day. Ask Him for His peace, if you begin to be anxious. Ask Him for His love for others. I believe that this is what Jesus meant, when he spoke about turning the other cheek.

Remember that God is in control. He is bringing about events which will finally lead to His reign upon this earth. And don’t forget that we will reign with Him!

Sometimes, when I am feeling anxious, I just say the name of Jesus, over and over. He brings His peace to me when I say His name.

“He who dwells in the secret place of the Most High
Shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty.
I will say of the Lord, “He is my refuge and my fortress;
My God, in Him I will trust” (Psalm 91: 1-2).

Shalom b’Yeshua (Peace in Jesus)

MARANATHA!

grandmageri422@gmail.com
Wordpress site: grandmageri422.me
[1] http://www.christianpost.com/news/franklin-graham-warns-christians-to-be-prepared-for-persecution-following-supreme-court-marriage-ruling-its-coming-and-so-is-gods-judgement-upon-america-140962/

THE RACIST DEMOCRATIC PARTY FINALLY EXPOSED!

On By Geri UngureanIn Uncategorized7 Comments

Racist democrats

“How you are fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!

How you are cut down to the ground, You who weakened the nations!”

(Isaiah 14:12).

We forget that when Satan roams around the earth, seeking whom he will devour, it’s not just individuals he seeks to deceive; it’s whole nations. He is the father of lies and the author of confusion. If you are a student of history, you know that countries have risen to greatness, only to crumble and fall.

There is a quote which some attribute to Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s propaganda minister “If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.” Some believe that Hitler himself said this. No matter which evil mind spoke those words, there is, unfortunately, truth in the statement. And as believers, we know from whom this originates.

The lie which has been propagated for over a century is that Democrats are the caring party. We’ve been told that they are for the underdog. History has been rewritten to tout the Democratic party as the party for the black man.

MY DEMOCRATIC UPBRINGING

Many of you know that I was brought up in an ultra liberal Jewish home. We were expected to be Democrats – no discussion on that was allowed. We were Jews, therefore we were Democrats. I often wondered about this as a young person, but did not dare to question it.

When I was born-again in 1983, upon reading the Word of God, I could no longer reconcile the platforms of the Democratic party with what I was reading from God’s Word. Abortion was obviously not of God. I spoke out about abortion being murder. I wrote many letters to the editor through the years about the evil of abortion.

Now, gay marriage is the democratic party’s newest social victory, or so perceived as a victory. It has become so clear to many people who have been duped for such a long time, that democrats are, in general, immoral and unethical people. They are a God hating people. At the last DNC, God was booed. Yes, you read that right – they booed the Creator of the Universe!

HISTORY OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

I happened upon a website which chronicles the events throughout American history, that clearly shows the opposite of what the common person would believe today about the Democratic party.

The website authors are black conservative women, who realized that the lie about the Democratic party, which has been told down through our history, has been believed because it was told so many times…..remember Hitler’s quote?

This is from one of the websites’ writers, Kuuleme Stephens:

“I found this article written in 2008 and I just had to feature it here! It is some interesting reading, and I do encourage others to do research and look for themselves!!! I was “born” into the Democrat Party, most of my family members are Democrats! It was not until later on (after I joined the military, and was out on my own in the real world) that I began to hear things about the Republican Party and began to research who was actually for the Black Community , Ending Slavery, and the Civil Rights Movement and who was not. I think it is very important that people expose themselves to and know accurate history, not just the stuff that you have been spoon fed from the Left, other family members, and friends. If people would educate themselves, this Country wouldn’t be going down the drain so fast! I hope you enjoy the article and please share this with any and every Liberal friend (Black, White or Any Race) that you may have, so they might have a chance to learn accurate history and educate themselves as well!” [1]

The article of which Ms. Kuuleme spoke is posted here in its entirety. Please note that this piece was written in 2008, before the reign of Barack Hussein Obama began:
FROM realdemocrathistory.wordpress.com:

“The KKK was the terrorist wing of the Democrat Party:

Our nation’s top historians reveal that the Democratic Party gave us the Ku Klux Klan, Black Codes, Jim Crow Laws and other repressive legislation which resulted in the multitude of murders, lynchings, mutilations, and intimidations (of thousands of black and white Republicans). On the issue of slavery: historians say the Democrats gave their lives to expand it, the Republicans gave their lives to ban it.

THE DEMOCRATS:

Democrats fought to expand slavery while Republicans fought to end it.

Democrats passed those discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws.

Democrats supported and passed the Missouri Compromise to protect slavery.

Democrats supported and passed the Kansas Nebraska Act to expand slavery.

Democrats supported and backed the Dred Scott Decision.

Democrats opposed educating blacks and murdered our teachers.

Democrats fought against anti-lynching laws.

Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, is well known for having been a “Kleagle” in the Ku Klux Klan.

Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, personally filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for 14 straight hours to keep it from passage.

Democrats passed the Repeal Act of 1894 that overturned civil right laws enacted by Republicans.

Democrats declared that they would rather vote for a “yellow dog” than vote for a Republican, because the Republican Party was known as the party for blacks.

Democrat President Woodrow Wilson, reintroduced segregation throughout the federal government immediately upon taking office in 1913.

Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s first appointment to the Supreme Court was a life member of the Ku Klux Klan, Sen. Hugo Black, Democrat of Alabama.

Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s choice for vice president in 1944 was Harry Truman, who had joined the Ku Klux Klan in Kansas City in 1922.

Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt resisted Republican efforts to pass a federal law against lynching.

Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt opposed integration of the armed forces.

Democrat Senators Sam Ervin, Albert Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd were the chief opponents of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Democrats supported and backed Judge John Ferguson in the case of Plessy v Ferguson.

Democrats supported the School Board of Topeka Kansas in the case of Brown v The Board of Education of Topeka Kansas.

Democrat public safety commissioner Eugene “Bull” Connor, in Birmingham, Ala., unleashed vicious dogs and turned fire hoses on black civil rights demonstrators.

Democrats were who Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the other protesters were fighting.

Democrat Georgia Governor Lester Maddox “brandished an ax hammer to prevent blacks from patronizing his restaurant.

Democrat Governor George Wallace stood in front of the Alabama schoolhouse in 1963, declaring there would be segregation forever.

Democrat Arkansas Governor Faubus tried to prevent desegregation of Little Rock public schools.

Democrat Senator John F. Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil rights Act.

Democrat President John F. Kennedy opposed the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King.

Democrat President John F. Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI.

Democrat President Bill Clinton’s mentor was U.S. Senator J. William Fulbright, an Arkansas Democrat and a supporter of racial segregation.

Democrat President Bill Clinton interned for J. William Fulbright in 1966-67.

Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright signed the Southern Manifesto opposing the Supreme Court’s 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision.

Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright joined with the Dixiecrats in filibustering the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1964.

Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright voted against the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

Southern Democrats opposed desegregation and integration.

Democrats opposed:

The Emancipation Proclamation

The 13th Amendment

The 14th Amendment

The 15th Amendment

The Reconstruction Act of 1867

The Civil Rights of 1866

The Enforcement Act of 1870

The Forced Act of 1871

The Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871

The Civil Rights Act of 1875

The Freeman Bureau

The Civil Rights Act of 1957

The Civil Rights Act of 1960

The United State Civil Rights Commission
Republicans gave strong bi-partisan support and sponsorship for the following
legislation:

The Civil Rights Act of 1964

The Voting Rights Act of 1965

The 1968 Civil Rights Acts

The Equal Opportunity Act of 1972

Goals and Timetables for Affirmative Action Programs

Comprehensive Employment Training Act of 1973

Voting Rights Act of Amendment of 1982

Civil Rights Act of 1983

Federal Contract Compliance and Workforce Development Act of 1988

THE REPUBLICANS:

Republicans enacted civil rights laws in the 1950’s and 1960’s, over the objection of Democrats.
Republicans founded the HBCU’s (Historical Black College’s and Universities) and started the NAACP to counter the racist practices of the Democrats.

Republicans pushed through much of the ground-breaking civil rights legislation in Congress.

Republicans fought slavery and amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom, citizenship and the right to vote.

Republicans pushed through much of the groundbreaking civil rights legislation from the 1860s through the 1960s.

Republican President Dwight Eisenhower sent troops into the South to desegregate the schools.

Republican President Eisenhower appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the Supreme Court, which resulted in the 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision.

Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois, not Democrat President Lyndon Johnson, was the one who pushed through the civil rights laws of the 1960’s
.
Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois wrote the language for the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing.

Republican and black American, A. Phillip Randolph, organized the 1963 March by Dr. King on Washington.

The 1964 Civil Rights Act Roll Call Vote: In the House, only 64 percent of the Democrats (153 yes, 91 no), but 80 percent of the Republicans (136 yes, 35 no), voted for it. In the Senate, while only 68 percent of the Democrats endorsed the bill (46 yes, 21 no), 82 percent of the Republicans voted to enact it (27 yes, 6 no).

Thaddeus Stevens, a Radical Republican that introduced legislation to give African Americans the so-called 40 acres and a mule and Democrats overwhelmingly voted against the bill.

During the Senate debates on the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, it was revealed that members of the Democratic Party formed many terrorist organizations like the Ku Klux Klan to murder and intimidate African Americans voters. The Ku Klux Klan Act was a bill introduced by a Republican Congress to stop Klan Activities.

History reveals that Democrats lynched, burned, mutilated and murdered thousands of blacks and completely destroyed entire towns and communities occupied by middle class Blacks, including Rosewood, Florida, the Greenwood District in Tulsa Oklahoma, and Wilmington, North Carolina to name a few.

History reveals that it was Abolitionists and Radical Republicans such as Henry L. Morehouse and General Oliver Howard that started many of the traditional Black colleges, while Democrats fought to keep them closed. Many of our traditional Black colleges are named after white Republicans.

After exclusively giving the Democrats their votes for the past 25 years, the average African American cannot point to one piece of civil rights legislation sponsored solely by the Democratic Party that was specifically designed to eradicate the unique problems that African Americans face today.

As of 2004, the Democrat Party (the oldest political party in America) has never elected a black man to the United States Senate, the Republicans have elected three.” [2]

It amazes and saddens me, that after more than a century of civil rights battles, blacks still flock to the party what opposed every civil rights initiative since the Emancipation Proclamation! The party of the Ku Klux Klan has duped the black community into believing that they are the only party who cares about them. Blacks are so convinced that the Republicans are evil, and opposed to them, that they persecute the many blacks who are becoming Republicans!

“In humility correcting those who are in opposition, if God perhaps will grant them repentance, so that they may know the truth, and that they may come to their senses and escape the snare of the devil, having been taken captive by him to do his will” (2 Timothy 2: 25-26).

FROM TOWNHALL.COM

“People’s perception of freedom never ceases to amaze me. French revolutionaries sent the ruling class to the guillotine, only to enslave themselves to the class structure of socialism. The Russian Czars were chased out of their own country so that “freedom fighters” could live under the tyranny of communism. And, after more than a century of civil liberty battles and triumphs, African-Americans are flocking to the party that opposed every measurable civil rights initiative since the Emancipation Proclamation. It should stun historians that the party of the Ku Klux Klan and segregation now has an undeniable stranglehold on black America.

In fact, a quick Google search will yield thousands of results claiming the mantel of moral superiority in the name of Democrats. The Left’s self-righteous proclamation of compassion is matched only by their insatiable eagerness to twist history. It was the Republican Party – the party established on the abolitionist platform – that passed the Civil Rights acts of 1866 and 1875. The founders of the NAACP were all registered Republicans. Dwight Eisenhower (a Republican) is the president who sent troops to Arkansas to de-segregate schools. Republicans carried the Civil Rights acts of the ‘50s and 60’s to the President’s desk. Richard Nixon wrote the US commission on Civil Rights in 1975. It was George W Bush who appointed more minorities to his cabinet than any President before him.

And despite the fact that the Democrat party supported the KKK, instituted Jim Crow laws, fought for “separate but equal” southern laws, and opposed Martin Luther King Jr.’s march on Washington, they claim to be the party of the downtrodden. Perusing through websites like Salon, the New York Times, and the Huffington Post, one can find an endless number of articles describing the GOP as a party of rich, and racist, white men.

Today’s Party of Barack Obama and Harry Reid, ignores FDR’s history of opposing anti-lynching laws. They ignore John F Kennedy’s vote, as a Senator, against the 1950’s era civil rights laws. They even ignore the egregious violence and lawlessness that plague some of America’s most Democrat cities. (Such as Detroit, Chicago, Washington DC and Los Angeles.)

In a raging display that resembles the clinical definition of “denial”, the American left claims that Republicans have abandoned their civil-rights-minded past. They assert that the right wing of America is nothing more than racist, backward thinking rednecks who “cling to their guns, religion, and an antipathy toward people not like them.” (Remember Obama saying that?) But nothing could be further from the truth.

Conservative values – values that were intrinsic in American democracy long before the Republican Party – have always been the core of the right wing. Limited government, individualism, and equality are three values that helped spur the Republicans onto the national scene; and ultimately lead to their success in the fight for civil liberties. Today’s conservative causes continue the traditionally Republican heritage of promoting a better life for every American:

Welfare reform was not an assault on poor people of color. Rather, it was about lifting people (of any race or creed) out of poverty. Conservatives such as Newt Gingrich, Ronald Reagan, and even Calvin Coolidge, always believed the success of a welfare program should be judged by how many people no longer need it. While Newt Gingrich worked on reform that would limit welfare payments, Democrats looked at ways to make poverty more comfortable. Ninety-nine weeks of unemployment (today’s standard) is not designed to promote self-sufficiency; but it is certainly a populist and pandering attempt for votes. Wouldn’t a truly successful nation have little need for government-funded lunch programs, long-term unemployment benefits, and taxpayer-funded entitlements? Had Liberalism succeeded in lifting the afflicted out of victimization, wouldn’t cities like Chicago, Detroit, and Philadelphia be centers of prosperity and affluence for minorities?

Conservatism, and the GOP, have always been the party of the individual. Individual liberty and freedom is the defining measure of national freedom. Martin Luther King Jr. did not dream of a world where his children were treated different simply because of the color of their skin; he dreamed of a world that judged them on their intellect, their effort, their success and “the content of their character.” (Oh, and by the way, he was a Republican.)

In short: Conservatism proudly declares that rights are granted by God, and every human being is capable of prosperity. Government’s role, is to protect the individual from oppression, and guard our individual rights to life, liberty and property.

Liberalism declares rights are gifts from Government. The American Left appeals to those who identify themselves as victims in the same way socialists and communists appealed to the oppressed masses of Europe and Russia. The truth is, their policies only promise the destruction of the powerful, not the empowerment of the oppressed. And thus, the “victims” will forever remain “victims” of urban violence, failing schools, deteriorating infrastructure and welfare dependency.

The Republican Party hasn’t changed. Only the way it is perceived has evolved over the decades.

And likewise for the Party of the KKK.” [3]

Well, the lie was told over and over by the liberal media, and by professors on college campuses; not to mention that it is taught also in our public schools. And just as Hitler proclaimed — it was told enough times so as for people to finally believe it.

The average person on the street, knows almost nothing about the history of America. Even the kids who are attending Ivy League schools show their ignorance of history when interviewed.

Please use this article as a teaching tool for those who are deceived among your friends and family.

John Adams once said:
“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”

I do pray that the Lord would give America another chance, but I am sad to say that I believe it is too late. The ramifications of the passing of the SCOTUS decision on gay marriage is the final nail in the coffin of this once great nation under God.

Shalom b’Yeshua

MARANATHA!!

grandmageri422@gmail.com
[1] http://thelastcivilright.org/2012/08/19/the-democrat-party-vs-the-republican-party-who-is-the-true-champion-of-the-ending-slavery-the-civil-rights-movement-and-the-black-community/

[2] https://realdemocrathistory.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/the-kkk-was-the-terrorist-wing-of-the-democrat-party/

[3] http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/michaelschaus/2013/07/02/two-centuries-of-racism–brought-to-you-by-the-democrat-party-n1632012/page/full