So, what is the criteria which the Muslims in our Congress use to form their “No Go” lists? One point is “Are you a Muslim?” The second point and equally enforced is “Are you a Jew?” I am surmising that these Muslims do not open their doors for Evangelicals either.
A FB friend sent me the video of this woman who was kicked out of a Keith Ellison meeting. By the way, Mr. Ellison was sworn in on a Qur’an. Here is the video:
What Are They Hiding?
I believe that these Muslims, who will NOT defend nor support our Constitution, are discussing their agenda. By that I mean their plans to continue the Political Jihad across America; and with each political position attained by a Muslim, they are plotting to eventually overthrow our Constitution for Sharia law.
I have said this in so many articles, but it is imperative for us to fully understand Islam. It used to be called “The Religion of Peace.” Now, after many horrific terrorist attacks, people know that this is ludicrous.
But what people still do not understand is that Islam is NOT a religion as much as it is a Totalitarian political system, cloaked in robes of religion to deceive the world. They do not come to other countries to assimilate – NOT EVER! They come to other countries to dominate and get into political positions. This is called political Jihad.
Ask the Brits
I have many FB friends from the U.K. These people are sick at heart at what has happened to London. Many Muslims migrated to London through the years. They do not abort their children. Men sometimes have many wives, so they are populating quickly, while other people in London are having abortions. Do the math.
So now, the Mayor of London is a radical Muslim. His name is Sadiq Khan. One of my British friends says that parts of London are no longer recognizable as the capital of the U.K. There are gangs of Muslims who “groom” young British girls to be raped over and over by the Muslim men.
You see, in the Qur’an, it tells Muslims that this is permissible in a country that is not under Sharia law. They believe that the young British girls are fair game for them and under sharia – they will not be punished.
Do you think this is not coming to America?
You better think again. This toxic and satanic evil has already made its way into our Congress. The Anti Semitism is blatant, and so is the desire to overthrow our Constitution and replace it with sharia.
Benjamin Franklin inherently knew that this was inevitable. Read part of his speech to the Constitutional convention when our Constitution was drafted and voted upon:
“In these sentiments, Sir, I agree to this Constitution with all its faults, if they are such; because I think a general Government necessary for us, and there is no form of Government but what may be a blessing to the people if well administered, and believe farther that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in Despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic Government, being incapable of any other. I doubt too whether any other Convention we can obtain, may be able to make a better Constitution. For when you assemble a number of men to have the advantage of their joint wisdom, you inevitably assemble with those men, all their prejudices, their passions, their errors of opinion, their local interests, and their selfish views. From such an assembly can a perfect production be expected? It therefore astonishes me, Sir, to find this system approaching so near to perfection as it does; and I think it will astonish our enemies, who are waiting with confidence to hear that our councils are confounded like those of the Builders of Babel; and that our States are on the point of separation, only to meet hereafter for the purpose of cutting one another’s throats.Thus I consent, Sir, to this Constitution because I expect no better, and because I am not sure, that it is not the best.” (emphasis added)
Read this part again:
“this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in Despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic Government, being incapable of any other.”
We had a pretty good run but as Franklin said “When the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic Government, being incapable of any other.”
Brethren, we have come to that place of which Franklin sadly spoke.
“Colloquially, the word despot applies pejoratively to those who abuse their power and authority to oppress their populace, subjects, or subordinates. More specifically, the term often applies to a head of state or government. In this sense, it is similar to the pejorative connotations that are associated with the terms tyrant and dictator.”
All the talk about how America needs “Socialism” by hairbrained (sorry) new members of Congress is coming from the puppeteers who are organizing and dreaming of the NWO – One World Government. Socialism will DESTROY America and guess what? That is exactly what the Globalists are counting on.
My sanity is kept intact by knowing that God is in full control. We may not like seeing these things happening to our country, but if God allows events to happen, then He is simply further fulfilling His Prophetic Word.
The useful idiots have not a clue how they are being used.
For some time now, the Left has been cozying up to Islamist radicals. The “love affair” has happened for one main reason – the Left and the radical Muslims have hatred of America in common.
Have you noticed that the number of Radical Muslim attacks has decreased? Their playbook has changed. Political Jihad is the current strategy. We see it clearly in the U.K. where their capital has been overtaken by Muslims and they voted in a Muslim mayor, Sadiq Khan. in 2016.
Some say that London is not even recognizable any longer.
In the 2018 Mid-term election, the first Muslim women were elected to Congress: Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar.
Tlaib has already made a name for herself (although infamous) by stating at a rally “We’re going to impeach that M*****F***** – referring to President Trump.
Muslims do NOT assimilate
The average person has no idea that Muslims never come to a country to become a productive member of that society. No – instead they come into countries with invisible swords; never mixing with society and setting up their own territories.
They come to Conquer
Those Muslims who are running for office and now “winning” have one goal – they want to rid America of its Constitution and replace it with Sharia law. I am not surmising or guessing that this is their goal. It comes right out of their playbook which is the Qur’an.
Read my article from many years ago titled “The Truth About Islam.”
From nccs.net (National Center for Constitutional Studies)
The U. S. Constitution and Sharia Law
Throughout the history of this world there really have only been two kinds of law. We have given these systems of law very descriptive and easy names to remember. They are Rulers’ Law and People’s Law. Every legal system can fit under one of these two broad banners. Under Ruler’s Law, the king or dictator makes the law. Under People’s Law, the people make or accept the law by which they live. It is interesting that some of the most dominant kinds of legal systems have come about when it is claimed to emanate from God. Under Ruler’s Law, if the ruler can make the people believe he has a divine right to rule, he can persuade the people to do about anything and the use of force becomes acceptable to many people if done in the name of God. Under People’s Law, as was the case in Ancient Israel, when the people accepted Jehovah as their King and accepted His laws as their laws, it had a powerful persuasiveness to right actions. The major difference was that there was no use of force. Not even God would force a leader or laws on a people they did not willingly accept, because He respects the agency of man. Religion has been a powerful force throughout history in either types of law.
In following the example of Ancient Israel, America’s Founders set forth laws based on the laws of nature and of nature’s God. It has catapulted the United States to an unmatched position as the most prosperous and freest nation on earth.
Now we are faced with the same kind of threat that has been seen in the past-a system of compulsory laws which has the use of force at its very core and which claims to emanate from God. It is called Sharia Law.
In 2010, an exhaustive study was published by a group of top security policy experts concerned with the preeminent totalitarian threat of our time: the legal-political-military doctrine known within Islam as Shariah. The study was designed to provide a “second opinion” on the official assessments of this threat as put forth by the United States government, which assessments included co-existence, accommodation, and even submission. By permission, much of the following is taken from this study.
What is Sharia?
The Arabic word “shariah,” according to one modern English-language student textbook on Islam, “literally means a straight path (Quran 45:18) or an endless supply of water. It is the term used to describe the rules of the lifestyle ordained by Allah. In more practical terms, shariah includes all the do’s and don’ts of Islam.” In other words, shariah is held by mainstream Islamic authorities – not to be confused with “radical,” “extremist” or “political” elements said to operate at the fringes of Islam – to be the perfect expression of divine will and justice and thus is the supreme law that must comprehensively govern all aspects of Muslims’ lives, irrespective of when or where they live. Shariah is characterized as a “complete way of life” (social, cultural, military, religious, and political), governed from cradle to grave by Islamic law.
While there are a few additional sources for sharia, the most notable and authoritative is the Quran. In Islamic parlance, the Quran is considered to be the uncreated word of Allah. According to Muslim belief, it has existed since the beginning of time and was revealed by the Archangel Gabriel in the 7th Century to the Prophet Mohammed in the Arabic language of his homeland. It is interesting to note that the verses in the Quran are not compiled in chronological order of revelations but are organized from longest to shortest. This presents confusion in trying to read the Quran. Also, there is really no central authority to clarify or interpret the versus, so many are left to their own understanding of the writings.
While many, many millions of Muslims around the world do not practice their faith in a manner consistent with shariah, those who do practice shariah have grounds for arguing that their version of Islam is the authoritative one because of the Islamic doctrine of abrogation-which holds that the later verses supersedes or abrogates the earlier ones. As a result, the later verses become much more violent and forceful in relation to non-Muslims. For example:
“Fight and slay the unbelievers wherever ye find them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war. But if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them; for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. (Q 9:5)
“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Apostle, nor acknowledge the religion of truth, even if they are of the people of the Book [meaning Christians and Jews], until they pay the jizya [taxes on non-Muslims] with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. (Q 9:29)
Shariah is Anti-Constitutional
Whether pursued through the violent form of jihad (holy war) or stealthier practices that shariah Islamists often refer to as “dawa” (the “call to Islam”), shariah rejects fundamental premises of American society and values:
the bedrock proposition that the governed have a right to make law for themselves;
the democratic republic governed by the Constitution;
freedom of conscience; individual liberty
freedom of expression (including the liberty to analyze and criticize shariah);
economic liberty (including private property);
equal treatment under the law (including that of men and women, and of Muslims and non-Muslims);
freedom from cruel and unusual punishments; an unequivocal condemnation of terrorism (i.e., one that is based on a common sense meaning of the term and does not rationalize barbarity as legitimate “resistance”); and
an abiding commitment to deflate and resolve political controversies by the ordinary mechanisms of our democratic republic, not wanton violence. The subversion campaign known as “civilization jihad” must not be confused with, or tolerated as, a constitutionally protected form of religious practice. Its ambitions transcend what American law recognizes as the sacrosanct realm of private conscience and belief. It seeks to supplant our Constitution with its own totalitarian framework.
America’s Founders and Islam
America’s earliest presidents best understood these founding principles. They were not only deeply involved with their formal adoption, but they were professionally competent in explaining them. When confronted with an Islamic threat, they took the effort to consult primary sources and to conduct competent analysis of that threat.
In 1786, Thomas Jefferson, ambassador to France, and John Adams, ambassador to England, met with the emissary of the Islamic potentates of Tripoli to Britain, Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, regarding the demands for tribute being made at the time by the so-called Barbary Pirates.
Afterwards, Jefferson and Adams sent a four-page report to the Congress describing this meeting. The relevant portion of their report reads:
“We took the liberty to make some inquiries concerning the Grounds of their pretentions to make war upon Nations who had done them no Injury, and observed that we considered all mankind as our friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation.
“The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their prophet, that it was written in their Qur’an, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman [Muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
John Adams’ son and our sixth president, John Quincy Adams, whose formative years coincided with the founding of the republic, offers further insights into the early presidents’ views on this subject. Like many Americans, he took an oath to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. And, when faced with an Islamic enemy, he understood his obligation to be educated on the factual aspects of the principles, doctrines, objectives, jurisprudence and theology of shariah that comprised his enemy’s threat doctrine.
John Quincy Adams’ 136-page series of essays on Islam displayed a clear understanding of the threat facing America then – and now, especially from the permanent Islamic institutions of jihad and dhimmitude. Regarding these two topics, Adams states:
“…[Mohammed] declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind…. The precept of the Quran is, perpetual war against all who deny, that [Mohammed] is the prophet of God.
“The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute. As the essential principle of [Mohammed’s] faith is the subjugation of others by the sword; it is only by force, that his false doctrines can be dispelled, and his power annihilated.
“The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force.
“This appeal to the natural hatred of the Mussulmen towards the infidels is in just accordance with the precepts of the Quran. The document [the Quran] does not attempt to disguise it, nor even pretend that the enmity of those whom it styles the infidels, is any other than the necessary consequence of the hatred borne by the Mussulmen to them – the paragraph itself, is a forcible example of the contrasted character of the two religions.
“The fundamental doctrine of the Christian religion is the extirpation of hatred from the human heart. It forbids the exercise of it, even towards enemies. There is no denomination of Christians, which denies or misunderstands this doctrine. All understand it alike – all acknowledge its obligations; and however imperfectly, in the purposes of Divine Providence, its efficacy has been shown in the practice of Christians, it has not been wholly inoperative upon them. Its effect has been upon the manners of nations. It has mitigated the horrors of war – it has softened the features of slavery – it has humanized the intercourse of social life. The unqualified acknowledgement of a duty does not, indeed, suffice to insure its performance. Hatred is yet a passion, but too powerful upon the hearts of Christians. Yet they cannot indulge it, except by the sacrifice of their principles, and the conscious violation of their duties. No state paper from a Christian hand, could, without trampling the precepts of its Lord and Master, have commenced by an open proclamation of hatred to any portion of the human race. The Ottoman lays it down as the foundation of his discourse.”
In conclusion, it is clear from the writings of several of our earliest presidents, as well as the texts of the nation’s founding documents, that American principles are not at odds with – and imperiled by – some “radical” or “extreme” version of Islam. Rather, it is the mainstream doctrine of shariah that constitutes the threat to the U.S. Constitution and the freedoms it enshrines. That incompatibility has several practical implications: For one thing, the shariah legal code cannot be insinuated into America – even through stealthy means or democratic processes – without violating the Constitution’s Article VI Supremacy Clause, which requires that the Constitution “shall be the supreme Law of the land.”
Even more reprehensible is the willingness of some among America’s elites, and it would appear even a subset of its elected leaders, to accede to these groups’ increasingly insistent contention that shariah is compatible with the U.S. Constitution. In fact, based on shariah’s tenets, its core attributes – especially its intolerance of other faiths and disfavored populations and its bid for supremacy over all other legal or political systems, there can be no confusion on this score: As the Framers fully understood, shariah is an enemy of the United States Constitution. The two are incompatible. source
I would strongly encourage the readers of this article to print this out. Our Leftist liberal friends and family deserve to know the truth about sharia law and how it is absolutely incompatible with our Constitution.
I realize that many in America loathe our Constitution, so showing this to that type of person would be fruitless. But I believe that there are many who are just rebellious and do not research for themselves. Rebels without a cause, if you will.
Perhaps some of these rebels, when faced with “facts” just might come to their own conclusions.
We must continue to pray for the lost. This world is getting darker by the day.