Trump Administration Considers Allowing Local Governments to Veto Refugee Resettlement

The politically correct camp would no doubt make this a case of xenophobia – but is it?   Is it not the right of Americans to say NO to thousands of so-called refugees?

I say “so-called” because this is part of the forced migration by the U.N. Don’t let ANYONE tell you something different.

In 2015, the U.N. came up with the Sustainable Development Goals initiative. Typical jargon from the U.N.  It sounds good on its face, but when you really look into it, you see that it’s just more Globalist Garbage.

I’ve written a few articles through the years about this “forced migration.”  Do people actually think that this happened spontaneously with no funding or organization??  And there is NO part of this which can be called humanitarian.

As we’ve watched Europe morph into something almost unrecognizable in the past 4 years, the U.S. has been invaded on our southern border. Do you not realize that without a proper vetting of these people, many jihadi Muslims are coming over in the midst of the crowds!?

Here is a piece I wrote about the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG):

George Soros Admits to Funding the Forced Migration of Muslims Put Into Place By the U.N.:  A Step Closer to NWO

Here is another article on a true hero, PM Viktor Orban of Hungary:

Hungary’s Orban Speaks Against Soros – EU Plan To Create a Mixed New Islamized Europe

When Saudi Arabia was asked if they were taking in Muslim migrants, they answered by saying “no” they were not.  They said that their contribution to the migrant “crisis” was to build mosques in the host countries.

Talk about a Trojan Horse!!

This article is from today:


Trump admin to consider allowing local governments to veto refugee resettlement

Amid a week full of executive realigning of immigration policies with the original laws passed by Congress, the Trump administration is setting its eyes on another proposal to give the American people more of a say in the future of their society. NBC is reportingthat according to a draft proposal, “the federal government will resettle refugees only where both the relevant state and local governments have consented to participate” in the resettlement program.

This is a proposal I have long championed and wrote about in my book. While immigration in general is a national policy and was designed to be dealt with at a federal level, as I explain in chapter eight of Stolen Sovereignty, refugee resettlement is different:

In some respects, refugee resettlement is a more destructive form of social transformation for local communities than any other form of immigration. Unlike other categories of immigration, refugees by definition do not go through the organic process of becoming immigrants. They are brought over and resettled, often in large numbers concentrated in specific localities, with no acclimation to American culture or the ability to support themselves. Despite the plethora of resettlement assistance programs run by the State Department, HHS’s Office of Refugee Resettlement, and taxpayer-funded NGOs, most refugees wind up on the full array of welfare programs. Most important, they strain the public services and public education of the local jurisdictions that are forced to accept them.

Thus, communities are transformed in a matter of a few years (just look at Minneapolis or Lewiston, Maine), all at the behest of international officials, unelected State Department officials, HHS bureaucrats, and parasitic contractors who have everything to gain and nothing to lose by endangering the communities and saddling them with a fiscal burden. The states and the taxpayers have no say in the matter.

No legal body in this country — from Congress to state legislatures — would approve the resettlement of tens of thousands of Somali refugees if they had to affirmatively approve it today. Unfortunately, in the most grotesque violation of the social contract and consent-based citizenship, the most radical forms of cultural transformation are in the hands of unelected entities. This proposal would right this ship and empower the people.

When we bring in such large numbers of immigrants, we are inevitably importing the values of their part of the world instead of a manageable number of individuals yearning to champion our values. Should we not be concerned with the social transformation of our democratic values and the culture of some of our small and mid-sized cities?

Let’s take a city like Amarillo, Texas, for example. It is a relatively small city in the heartland of our country. In recent years, without any input from the locals or state officials, the federal government – at the behest of private taxpayer-funded contractors – has resettled a couple thousand refugees from the most radically divergent cultures. Since 2002, according to the WRAPS State Department database, Amarillo has been sent 352 refugees from Congo, 718 from Iran, 396 from Iraq, and 605 from Somalia. There are no numbers on the secondary migration, but refugees are all on a fast track to citizenship, after which they can bring in family members and commence the chain of migration from the same countries of origin. Amarillo has the most refugees per capita of any city in Texas.

This social transformation without representation not only violates the promise of federalism and governance by the consent of the governed, it violates the Refugee Act of 1980. The statute clearly directs the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) to “insure that a refugee is not initially placed or resettled in an area highly impacted by the presence of refugees or comparable populations.” When making this determination, the director of the ORR is supposed to take into account “the proportion of refugees and comparable entrants in the population in the area,” “the availability of employment opportunities, affordable housing, and public and private resources,” and “the likelihood of refugees placed in the area becoming self-sufficient and free from long-term dependence on public assistance.” (Sec. 412. of the Immigration and Naturalization Act 8 U.S.C. 1522.)

In addition to violating the conditions of refugee resettlement, the feds have violated federal law over the past few decades. The law requires the federal government to coordinate with local officials at every stage of the process, including “advance consultation with State and local governments.” The word “state” is mentioned 41 times in section 412 of the INA. Such consultations rarely take place.

Ideally, given the amount of illegal immigration and bogus asylum we are dealing with at our border, Trump should set the refugee cap at zero for the coming year. At the very least, he should direct HHS to only settle refugees in areas where local officials agree. If the forces of social transformation think their ideas are so popular, why are they scared of input from the communities? If we fought a revolution over “no taxation without representation,” it’s only appropriate that we allow no social transformation without representation. source

Brethren, the last sentence of the article is so powerful – I’m going to post that again:

“If we fought a revolution over “no taxation without representation,” it’s only appropriate that we allow no social transformation without representation.”

I do believe that our Founding Fathers would agree!

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom b’Yeshua


Armed With Knives, a Massive Muslim Caravan of Over 20,000 Crossing Over Into Europe

Is it merely coincidence that Europe is about to be invaded by a huge caravan of illegal immigrants? The only difference between this and the caravan demanding entrance into the U.S. is that Europe’s immigrants are all Muslim.

And now it is being reported that nearly every one of these so-called refugees is armed with knives.

The Lies of Emmanuel Macron

During the celebration of the end of WWI which was held in France, Macron delivered a verbal lashing to leaders of countries who are nationalists or populists. The French leader declared that nationalism is the opposite of patriotism.

It was obvious to all who attended that Macron was pointing his finger at President Trump.


“The old demons are rising again, ready to complete their task of chaos and of death,” Macron said.

“Patriotism is the exact opposite of nationalism. Nationalism is a betrayal of patriotism,” he said. “In saying ‘Our interests first, whatever happens to the others,’ you erase the most precious thing a nation can have, that which makes it live, that which causes it to be great and that which is most important: Its moral values.”

Moral values?  I think that it would be better stated “Globalist Goals.”

What Do the People of France Think about Muslim Migrants?

It seems that most of the population of France does not agree with their pompous leader:


Too many foreigners in France and Islam is not compatible, majority of France say:

Most french people say there are too many foreigners in France.  Immigrants do not make an effort to assimilate and Islam is incompatible with French values.

France’s new president clearly has some healing to do when it comes to two longstanding  divisive issues in France.

Immigration and the place of Islam in society are very much contentious questions for the French, a new annual survey has revealed.

A poll by the Ipsos Institute for Le Monde newspaper has revealed that a majority of    65% of French people say that there are too many foreigners in France, a figure that remains elevated in recent years,  with the figures as high as 70% in 2017.

Another stat demonstrated a majority of French people are uncomfortable with immigration was the 60% of people who agreed with the statement:  “Today I no longer feel at home like I did before.”

On top of that some 60% of French people share the belief that “Immigrants in France do not make an effort to integrate.”

Some 46% of French people believe it’s not difficult for an immigrant to integrate.

Unsurprising, the percentages are far higher among those on the far right – 95% of National Front votes believe there are too many foreigners in France compared to this on the left (46% of Socialists).

When it came to the other ever divisive issue of the role of Islam, 60% of the people questioned for the survey titled “French Fractures 2017), believe the religion of Islam is incompatible with the values of the French Republic.  source

Back to the European invasion at hand:


A massive Muslim caravan is crossing over into Europe, and almost every single one of them is armed with a knife according to intelligence reports – How should border control deal with this?



Migrant attempts to break into the EU have grown increasingly bold and forceful, with police and illegal immigrants injured in several clashes since the middle of October, when hundreds began camping at the border — reportedly after having been given misinformation that Croatia was set to open its frontiers.

According to Italian news agency ANSA, local media reports the groups send numbers of young people and children towards the police line to chant “open border, open border”, while clashes see mobs of young men charge at police, and throw stones and other projectiles.

“The Croats are trying really hard to handle this alone, and have even positioned special forces in the area”, but authorities in the Balkan nation are struggling to cope with worrying developments at the border, according to sources at the Austrian Interior Ministry reported by Austrian bestselling newspaper Kronen Zeitung.

“More [illegal immigrants] are arriving — there are no more families and there are hardly any women left,” sources at the ministry’s migration department are claimed to have said.

“Ninety-five per cent of these migrants who are trying to break through are young men, almost all of whom are armed with knives. A border policeman has already been stabbed,” the source said, adding that “the majority come from Pakistan but there are also many Iranians, Algerians and Moroccans”.

In terms of migrants’ maintenance and day-to-day living costs, ministry sources said the supply of provisions to the masses of people was being “fairly well-coordinated”, reporting that many of them have been equipped with prepaid debit cards provided by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

According to the refugee agency’s website, such cards are supplied to migrants as part of its “programmes for direct cash-aid to the displaced” in cooperation with Mastercard, which in 2016 announced it was distributing prepaid debit cards to provide migrants travelling towards EU nations through Serbia with “mobility, flexibility and dignity”.

While the mainstream media has repeatedly scorned rumours that George Soros is helping finance illegal immigration to Europe and the U.S., Mastercard reported last year it was partnering with the open borders-backing billionaire on ventures to “catalyse and accelerate economic and social development for … refugees and migrants.” source

So what is the take away from these massive migrant invasions occurring  simultaneously?

I believe that the U.N. is flexing its muscles to the world.  In essence, they are saying “Too bad – this is going to happen because we are determined to see a borderless, globalist world in the near future.”

Brethren, because we understand the Word of God, and we know that there will be a One World Government and religion in the future – none of this should come as a surprise to us.

Pray and trust our Lord.  He is always in control, even when we think that things are out of control.  All of these events must take place to further fulfill Bible prophecy!

Shalom b’Yeshua